Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Criminal law response to terrorism in the legislation of Spain and Italy

Krivičnopravno reagovanje na terorizam u zakonodavstvu Španije i Italije

Thumbnail
2018
855.pdf (371.3Kb)
Authors
Bodrožić, Ivana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Author presents and analyzes the manner, content and models of the criminal law reaction to terrorism, in two member states of the European Union, Spain and Italy, which had direct negative experiences with terrorist attacks and developed anti-terrorism laws. Knowledge of terrorism as a category of criminal law, as one of the existing incriminations in national legal systems, with a comparative analysis and analysis of solutions from the national criminal justice systems of the elected countries, can be the basis for a later comparison with the solutions accepted in the national criminal legislation, through which could be given some suggestions regarding some of the de lege ferenda solutions. At the end of the paper, the author concludes that the criminal law provisions on terrorism of the selected legislation are aligned with the aquis communitaire, as well as characterized by expansionism and punitiveism, which in a free, democratic state must be limited and constantly reconsidered.
U radu se daje prikaz i analiza korpusa krivičnopravnih odredaba o terorizmu u zakonodavstvu Španije i Italije, kao državama koje su imale neposrednih negativnih iskustava sa terorisičkim napadima. Cilj rada je da ukazivanjem na sličnosti i razlike u odabranom načinu i modelu krivičnopravne zaštite od terorizma bude ukazano na značaj harmonizovane reakcije na terorizam na nivou Evropske unije, koja je uspostavila zajednički krivičnopravni pojam terorizma i sličnih, sa njim povezanih, pojmova, sa krajnjim ciljem efikasnijeg suprotstavljanja ovom teškom obliku kriminaliteta. Kao zaključak autor iznosi konstataciju da su krivičnopravne odredbe o terorizmu odabranih zakonodavstva usklađene sa aquis communitaire, kao i da ih karakteriše ekspanzionizam i punitivizam, koji u demokratskoj, slobodnoj državi moraju biti ogranični i stalno preispitivani.
Keywords:
criminal offences of terrorism / Spain / Italy / krivična dela terorizma / Španija / Italija
Source:
Strani pravni život, 2018, 3, 109-123
Publisher:
  • Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Projekat Kriminalističko-policijske akademije: Kriminalitet u Srbiji i instrumenti državne reakcije

DOI: 10.5937/spz1803109B

ISSN: 0039-2138

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/857
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bodrožić, Ivana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/857
AB  - Author presents and analyzes the manner, content and models of the criminal law reaction to terrorism, in two member states of the European Union, Spain and Italy, which had direct negative experiences with terrorist attacks and developed anti-terrorism laws. Knowledge of terrorism as a category of criminal law, as one of the existing incriminations in national legal systems, with a comparative analysis and analysis of solutions from the national criminal justice systems of the elected countries, can be the basis for a later comparison with the solutions accepted in the national criminal legislation, through which could be given some suggestions regarding some of the de lege ferenda solutions. At the end of the paper, the author concludes that the criminal law provisions on terrorism of the selected legislation are aligned with the aquis communitaire, as well as characterized by expansionism and punitiveism, which in a free, democratic state must be limited and constantly reconsidered.
AB  - U radu se daje prikaz i analiza korpusa krivičnopravnih odredaba o terorizmu u zakonodavstvu Španije i Italije, kao državama koje su imale neposrednih negativnih iskustava sa terorisičkim napadima. Cilj rada je da ukazivanjem na sličnosti i razlike u odabranom načinu i modelu krivičnopravne zaštite od terorizma bude ukazano na značaj harmonizovane reakcije na terorizam na nivou Evropske unije, koja je uspostavila zajednički krivičnopravni pojam terorizma i sličnih, sa njim povezanih, pojmova, sa krajnjim ciljem efikasnijeg suprotstavljanja ovom teškom obliku kriminaliteta. Kao zaključak autor iznosi konstataciju da su krivičnopravne odredbe o terorizmu odabranih zakonodavstva usklađene sa aquis communitaire, kao i da ih karakteriše ekspanzionizam i punitivizam, koji u demokratskoj, slobodnoj državi moraju biti ogranični i stalno preispitivani.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Criminal law response to terrorism in the legislation of Spain and Italy
T1  - Krivičnopravno reagovanje na terorizam u zakonodavstvu Španije i Italije
IS  - 3
SP  - 109
EP  - 123
DO  - 10.5937/spz1803109B
UR  - conv_63
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bodrožić, Ivana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Author presents and analyzes the manner, content and models of the criminal law reaction to terrorism, in two member states of the European Union, Spain and Italy, which had direct negative experiences with terrorist attacks and developed anti-terrorism laws. Knowledge of terrorism as a category of criminal law, as one of the existing incriminations in national legal systems, with a comparative analysis and analysis of solutions from the national criminal justice systems of the elected countries, can be the basis for a later comparison with the solutions accepted in the national criminal legislation, through which could be given some suggestions regarding some of the de lege ferenda solutions. At the end of the paper, the author concludes that the criminal law provisions on terrorism of the selected legislation are aligned with the aquis communitaire, as well as characterized by expansionism and punitiveism, which in a free, democratic state must be limited and constantly reconsidered., U radu se daje prikaz i analiza korpusa krivičnopravnih odredaba o terorizmu u zakonodavstvu Španije i Italije, kao državama koje su imale neposrednih negativnih iskustava sa terorisičkim napadima. Cilj rada je da ukazivanjem na sličnosti i razlike u odabranom načinu i modelu krivičnopravne zaštite od terorizma bude ukazano na značaj harmonizovane reakcije na terorizam na nivou Evropske unije, koja je uspostavila zajednički krivičnopravni pojam terorizma i sličnih, sa njim povezanih, pojmova, sa krajnjim ciljem efikasnijeg suprotstavljanja ovom teškom obliku kriminaliteta. Kao zaključak autor iznosi konstataciju da su krivičnopravne odredbe o terorizmu odabranih zakonodavstva usklađene sa aquis communitaire, kao i da ih karakteriše ekspanzionizam i punitivizam, koji u demokratskoj, slobodnoj državi moraju biti ogranični i stalno preispitivani.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Criminal law response to terrorism in the legislation of Spain and Italy, Krivičnopravno reagovanje na terorizam u zakonodavstvu Španije i Italije",
number = "3",
pages = "109-123",
doi = "10.5937/spz1803109B",
url = "conv_63"
}
Bodrožić, I.. (2018). Criminal law response to terrorism in the legislation of Spain and Italy. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(3), 109-123.
https://doi.org/10.5937/spz1803109B
conv_63
Bodrožić I. Criminal law response to terrorism in the legislation of Spain and Italy. in Strani pravni život. 2018;(3):109-123.
doi:10.5937/spz1803109B
conv_63 .
Bodrožić, Ivana, "Criminal law response to terrorism in the legislation of Spain and Italy" in Strani pravni život, no. 3 (2018):109-123,
https://doi.org/10.5937/spz1803109B .,
conv_63 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB