Practice of European Court of Human Rights and criminal offences of terrorism

Abstract

The development of approaches to the use of criminal repression, in the context of substantive criminal, law for many years, was a question a lot of controversy, both in defining the crime of terrorism, and with setting the boundaries of criminal repression in this area. Terrorism, which essentially has the potential to undermine democracy and the rule of law by encouraging autoriternih tendency of authorities to fight this negative social - pathological phenomena, imposing views of the minority to the majority, without limits in achieving their goals, more than any other part of the world has hit Europe, which through its mechanisms, including the European court of Human rights and its practice, has developed specific counter-measures aimed at ensuring the libertarian political and cultural values of Europe. The rulings and case law related to combating terrorism have been set certain principles relating to the establishment of a balance between the effective response of the state and protection of human rights. Terrorism attacks the basics of democracy and the rule of law, a state against these attacks need to defend themselves while balancing the need to respect human rights and the response to terrorism.

Razvoj pristupa u korišćenju krivičnopravne represije u okviru materijalnog krivičnog prava, dugi niz godina, bilo je pitanje puno kontroverzi, kako u vezi sa definisanjem samog krivičnog dela terorizma, tako i sa postavljanjem granica krivičnopravne represije u ovoj oblasti. Terorizam koji u svojoj suštini poseduje potencijal da podrije demokratiju i vladavinu prava pospešivanjem autoritarnih tendencija vlasti u borbi protiv ove negativne socijalno - patološke pojave, nametanjem stavova manjine većini, bez granica u ostvarivanju svojih ciljeva, više nego bilo koji drugi deo sveta pogodio je Evropu, koja je kroz svoje mehanizme uključujući Evropski sud za ljudska prava i njegovu praksu razvila određene kontraterorističke mere namenjene obezbeđivanju slobodarskih političkih i kulturnih vrednosti Evrope. U presudama i praksi Suda u vezi sa suprotstavljanjem terorizmu postavljeni su određeni načelni principi, koji se odnose na uspostavljanje ravnoteže između efikasne reakcije države i zaštite ljudskih prava. Terorizam napada osnove demokratije i vladavine zakona, a države protiv ovih napada moraju da se brane uz balansiranje potrebe poštovanja ljudskih prava i odgovora na terorizam.