Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis
Privatizacija kažnjavanja - način za prevazilaženje ili produbljivanje krize zatvaranja
Apstrakt
Ever since it has been established the sentence of imprisonment has been disputed many times. The rise of recidivist crimes has only confirmed the limited power of imprisonment and the failure of the idea of resocialization which has also conditioned the reexamining of both the punishment and the manner of its implementation. In an attempt to modify the sentence of imprisonment many countries have started to include private sector in its implementation, while in some countries the governments have gone so far as to give the charge of penal facilities to private companies. It is this form of privatization of punishment that arouses the highest controversy in expert public as well as its actual implementation and this is why the special attention should be given to its description.
Od svog nastanka do danas kazna zatvora se suočavala sa brojnim osporavanjima. Porast kriminaliteta izvršenog u povratku samo je potvrdio ograničenu moć zatvaranja i neuspeh ideje resocijalizacije, što je uslovilo preispitivanje kako same kazne tako i načina njenog izvršenja. Nastojeći da modifikuju kaznu zatvora brojne zemlje u njeno sprovođenje počinju uključivati privatni sektor, dok je u nekim zemljama državno rukovodstvo otišlo toliko daleko da privatnim kompanijama poveravaju upravljanje kaznenim ustanovama. Upravo ovaj oblik privatizacije kažnjavanja stvara najveće kontroverze u stručnoj javnosti i sprovođenju na terenu zbog čega njegovom opisivanju treba posvetiti posebnu pažnju.
Ključne reči:
crime control / imprisonment / prison / crisis of imprisonment / privatization / kontrola kriminaliteta / kazna zatvora / kaznena ustanova / kriza zatvaranja / privatizacijaIzvor:
Strani pravni život, 2010, 1, 303-320Izdavač:
- Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
Institucija/grupa
JakovTY - JOUR AU - Kesić, Zoran PY - 2010 UR - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/321 AB - Ever since it has been established the sentence of imprisonment has been disputed many times. The rise of recidivist crimes has only confirmed the limited power of imprisonment and the failure of the idea of resocialization which has also conditioned the reexamining of both the punishment and the manner of its implementation. In an attempt to modify the sentence of imprisonment many countries have started to include private sector in its implementation, while in some countries the governments have gone so far as to give the charge of penal facilities to private companies. It is this form of privatization of punishment that arouses the highest controversy in expert public as well as its actual implementation and this is why the special attention should be given to its description. AB - Od svog nastanka do danas kazna zatvora se suočavala sa brojnim osporavanjima. Porast kriminaliteta izvršenog u povratku samo je potvrdio ograničenu moć zatvaranja i neuspeh ideje resocijalizacije, što je uslovilo preispitivanje kako same kazne tako i načina njenog izvršenja. Nastojeći da modifikuju kaznu zatvora brojne zemlje u njeno sprovođenje počinju uključivati privatni sektor, dok je u nekim zemljama državno rukovodstvo otišlo toliko daleko da privatnim kompanijama poveravaju upravljanje kaznenim ustanovama. Upravo ovaj oblik privatizacije kažnjavanja stvara najveće kontroverze u stručnoj javnosti i sprovođenju na terenu zbog čega njegovom opisivanju treba posvetiti posebnu pažnju. PB - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd T2 - Strani pravni život T1 - Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis T1 - Privatizacija kažnjavanja - način za prevazilaženje ili produbljivanje krize zatvaranja IS - 1 SP - 303 EP - 320 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_321 ER -
@article{ author = "Kesić, Zoran", year = "2010", abstract = "Ever since it has been established the sentence of imprisonment has been disputed many times. The rise of recidivist crimes has only confirmed the limited power of imprisonment and the failure of the idea of resocialization which has also conditioned the reexamining of both the punishment and the manner of its implementation. In an attempt to modify the sentence of imprisonment many countries have started to include private sector in its implementation, while in some countries the governments have gone so far as to give the charge of penal facilities to private companies. It is this form of privatization of punishment that arouses the highest controversy in expert public as well as its actual implementation and this is why the special attention should be given to its description., Od svog nastanka do danas kazna zatvora se suočavala sa brojnim osporavanjima. Porast kriminaliteta izvršenog u povratku samo je potvrdio ograničenu moć zatvaranja i neuspeh ideje resocijalizacije, što je uslovilo preispitivanje kako same kazne tako i načina njenog izvršenja. Nastojeći da modifikuju kaznu zatvora brojne zemlje u njeno sprovođenje počinju uključivati privatni sektor, dok je u nekim zemljama državno rukovodstvo otišlo toliko daleko da privatnim kompanijama poveravaju upravljanje kaznenim ustanovama. Upravo ovaj oblik privatizacije kažnjavanja stvara najveće kontroverze u stručnoj javnosti i sprovođenju na terenu zbog čega njegovom opisivanju treba posvetiti posebnu pažnju.", publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd", journal = "Strani pravni život", title = "Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis, Privatizacija kažnjavanja - način za prevazilaženje ili produbljivanje krize zatvaranja", number = "1", pages = "303-320", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_321" }
Kesić, Z.. (2010). Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis. in Strani pravni život Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(1), 303-320. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_321
Kesić Z. Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis. in Strani pravni život. 2010;(1):303-320. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_321 .
Kesić, Zoran, "Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis" in Strani pravni život, no. 1 (2010):303-320, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_321 .