Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards
Aktuelne pravne i kriminalističke mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka – komparativna analiza standarda u Nemačkoj i Srbiji
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The topic of the paper is comparative scientific
research analyzing the possibilities in eyewitness identification
procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of
Serbia, because of the fact that identification is one of the proving
actions used in both states. In this paper, what will be considered is
the advantages and disadvantages of identification procedures in these
states, in order to propose an optimal procedure that would be equally
objective and effective both for the witnesses and the suspect.
Beside similarities in the implementation of the identification
procedure in both states, there are some differences that are
essentially based on normative rules, which regulate whether the
police have the original authority to carry out this action or whether
the authorization of a public prosecutor is required. Also, there are
differences in forming the identification lineup and photo array,
especially in terms of the number of people or photographs that ...should
be presented to the eyewitness along with the suspect.
The scientific justification of this paper is reflected in the fact
that eyewitness identification requires clear standards for
implementation, so there is a need to create adequate preconditions for using this proving action in criminal proceedings, especially in
cases where there is a lack of material evidence.
Predmet rada je komparativna naučna analiza mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj i Republici Srbiji, zbog činjenice da prepoznavanje predstavlja jednu od dokaznih radnji u obe države. U radu će biti razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci postupka prepoznavanja u ovim državama, u cilju utvrđivanja optimalnog postupka koji bi podjednako bio efektivan i objektivan za svedoke i za osumnjičenog. Iako postoje sličnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja, javljaju se i pojedine razlike koje suštinski proističu iz normativnih pravila kojima se utvrđuje da li policija ima izvorno ovlašćenje da sprovede ovu radnju ili je potrebna autorizacija od strane tužioca. Takođe, razlike su primetne i u pogledu načina formiranja linije za prepoznavanje i foto albuma, naročito u pogledu broja lica ili fotografija koje će biti predočene svedoku, zajedno sa osumnjičenim. Naučna opravdanost rada ogleda se u činjenici da je neophodno postojanje jasnih stand...arda u sprovođenju radnje prepoznavanja, te postoji i potreba za uspostavljanjem adekvatnih preduslova kako bi se ova radnja mogla koristiti u krivičnom postupku, naročito u slučajevima koje odlikuje nedostatatak materijalnih dokaza.
Keywords:
identification / eyewitness / procedural provisions / criminalistics methods / prepoznavanje / svedoci / procesne odredbe / kriminalistiĉke metodeSource:
Безбедност, 2020, 62, 2, 141-156Publisher:
- Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије
Funding / projects:
- Development of Institutional Capacities, Standards and Procedures for Fighting Organized Crime and Terrorism in Climate of International Integrations (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-179045)
Collections
Institution/Community
JakovTY - JOUR AU - Tasić, Marija AU - Straub, Thomas PY - 2020 UR - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1307 AB - The topic of the paper is comparative scientific research analyzing the possibilities in eyewitness identification procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of Serbia, because of the fact that identification is one of the proving actions used in both states. In this paper, what will be considered is the advantages and disadvantages of identification procedures in these states, in order to propose an optimal procedure that would be equally objective and effective both for the witnesses and the suspect. Beside similarities in the implementation of the identification procedure in both states, there are some differences that are essentially based on normative rules, which regulate whether the police have the original authority to carry out this action or whether the authorization of a public prosecutor is required. Also, there are differences in forming the identification lineup and photo array, especially in terms of the number of people or photographs that should be presented to the eyewitness along with the suspect. The scientific justification of this paper is reflected in the fact that eyewitness identification requires clear standards for implementation, so there is a need to create adequate preconditions for using this proving action in criminal proceedings, especially in cases where there is a lack of material evidence. AB - Predmet rada je komparativna naučna analiza mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj i Republici Srbiji, zbog činjenice da prepoznavanje predstavlja jednu od dokaznih radnji u obe države. U radu će biti razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci postupka prepoznavanja u ovim državama, u cilju utvrđivanja optimalnog postupka koji bi podjednako bio efektivan i objektivan za svedoke i za osumnjičenog. Iako postoje sličnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja, javljaju se i pojedine razlike koje suštinski proističu iz normativnih pravila kojima se utvrđuje da li policija ima izvorno ovlašćenje da sprovede ovu radnju ili je potrebna autorizacija od strane tužioca. Takođe, razlike su primetne i u pogledu načina formiranja linije za prepoznavanje i foto albuma, naročito u pogledu broja lica ili fotografija koje će biti predočene svedoku, zajedno sa osumnjičenim. Naučna opravdanost rada ogleda se u činjenici da je neophodno postojanje jasnih standarda u sprovođenju radnje prepoznavanja, te postoji i potreba za uspostavljanjem adekvatnih preduslova kako bi se ova radnja mogla koristiti u krivičnom postupku, naročito u slučajevima koje odlikuje nedostatatak materijalnih dokaza. PB - Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије T2 - Безбедност T1 - Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards T1 - Aktuelne pravne i kriminalističke mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka – komparativna analiza standarda u Nemačkoj i Srbiji VL - 62 IS - 2 SP - 141 EP - 156 DO - 10.5937/bezbednost2002141T ER -
@article{ author = "Tasić, Marija and Straub, Thomas", year = "2020", abstract = "The topic of the paper is comparative scientific research analyzing the possibilities in eyewitness identification procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of Serbia, because of the fact that identification is one of the proving actions used in both states. In this paper, what will be considered is the advantages and disadvantages of identification procedures in these states, in order to propose an optimal procedure that would be equally objective and effective both for the witnesses and the suspect. Beside similarities in the implementation of the identification procedure in both states, there are some differences that are essentially based on normative rules, which regulate whether the police have the original authority to carry out this action or whether the authorization of a public prosecutor is required. Also, there are differences in forming the identification lineup and photo array, especially in terms of the number of people or photographs that should be presented to the eyewitness along with the suspect. The scientific justification of this paper is reflected in the fact that eyewitness identification requires clear standards for implementation, so there is a need to create adequate preconditions for using this proving action in criminal proceedings, especially in cases where there is a lack of material evidence., Predmet rada je komparativna naučna analiza mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj i Republici Srbiji, zbog činjenice da prepoznavanje predstavlja jednu od dokaznih radnji u obe države. U radu će biti razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci postupka prepoznavanja u ovim državama, u cilju utvrđivanja optimalnog postupka koji bi podjednako bio efektivan i objektivan za svedoke i za osumnjičenog. Iako postoje sličnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja, javljaju se i pojedine razlike koje suštinski proističu iz normativnih pravila kojima se utvrđuje da li policija ima izvorno ovlašćenje da sprovede ovu radnju ili je potrebna autorizacija od strane tužioca. Takođe, razlike su primetne i u pogledu načina formiranja linije za prepoznavanje i foto albuma, naročito u pogledu broja lica ili fotografija koje će biti predočene svedoku, zajedno sa osumnjičenim. Naučna opravdanost rada ogleda se u činjenici da je neophodno postojanje jasnih standarda u sprovođenju radnje prepoznavanja, te postoji i potreba za uspostavljanjem adekvatnih preduslova kako bi se ova radnja mogla koristiti u krivičnom postupku, naročito u slučajevima koje odlikuje nedostatatak materijalnih dokaza.", publisher = "Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије", journal = "Безбедност", title = "Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards, Aktuelne pravne i kriminalističke mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka – komparativna analiza standarda u Nemačkoj i Srbiji", volume = "62", number = "2", pages = "141-156", doi = "10.5937/bezbednost2002141T" }
Tasić, M.,& Straub, T.. (2020). Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards. in Безбедност Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије., 62(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2002141T
Tasić M, Straub T. Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards. in Безбедност. 2020;62(2):141-156. doi:10.5937/bezbednost2002141T .
Tasić, Marija, Straub, Thomas, "Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards" in Безбедност, 62, no. 2 (2020):141-156, https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2002141T . .