TY  - CHAP
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1591
AB  - U radu se analizira primena pojedinih alternativnih sankcija i mera u praksi, kao i uloga policije
u sistemu izvršenja istih, sa posebnim akcentom na kontrolu izvršenja kućnog zatvora, uslovne
osude sa zaštitnim nadzorom, uslovne osude koja se može opozvati ako dođe do kršenja mere
bezbednosti „zabrane prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ i „kućnog pritvora“.
Tako usmereno istraživanje imalo je za cilj da se u metodološki ispravnom postupku identifikuju
i naučno opišu ključni problemi u postupanju državnih organa i ustanova koje izriču, sprovode
i vrše kontrolu nad izvršenjem vanzavodskih sankcija i mera propisanih zakonom. Primenom
metoda analize sadržaja, statističkog metoda, komparativne i formalno-logičke analize u radu
je analizirano više primera iz prakse suda, poverničke službe i Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova
uporedo sa analizom rezultata aktuelnih teorijskih istraživanja i relevantnih pravnih propisa i
akata. Kao ključni problemi identifikovane su nedorečenosti u postupcima: izricanja i određivanja
alternativnih sankcija i mera, njihovom sprovođenju i kontroli izvršenja. Zaključcima izvedenim
sintezom tih rezultata kao ključni uzroci opisanih problema potvrđeni su: 1) nedonošenje ili
neblagovremeno donošenje podzakonskih propisa i 2) selektivna primena zakona. Posledica
uočenih problema je nizak stepen zaštite žrtve i neostvarivanje ciljeva specijalne prevencije
AB  - The author analyses the application of certain alternative criminal sanctions and measures in
practice, as well as the role of the police in the enforcement system, with a special emphasis on
the control of the execution of house arrest, conditional sentence with protective supervision,
the conditional sentence that may be repelled if the security measure is breached, the ban on
attending certain sports events, as well as house arrest. Such a study aimed at identify and
scientifically describe, in the proper methodological procedure, the key problems in the practice
of state authorities and institutions imposing, enforcing and controlling the enforcement of
extra-carceral sanctions and measures prescribed by the Law. By applying the method of content
analysis, statistical method, comparative and formal and logical analysis, the author has
examined several examples from the practice of courts, the commissioner’s department and the
Ministry of Interior. In parallel, he analyzed the results of the current theoretical research and the
relevant legislation. The key issues that were identified is the ambiguity of procedure: the imposing
and ordering alternative sanctions and measures, the implementation and control thereof. The
conclusion confirmed the roots of the said above described problems: 1) the failure to adopt or
timely adopt the proper bylaws and 2) selective application of the Law. The consequences is a low
level of protection of the victims and the failure to achieve the goals of special prevention.
PB  - Beograd : Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji
T2  - Alternativne krivične sankcije : (regionalna krivična zakonodavstva, iskustva u primeni i mere unapređenja)
T1  - Uloga policije u sistemu izvršenja alternativnih sankcija i mera
T1  - The role of the police in the system of enforcement of alternative sanctions and measures
SP  - 299
EP  - 314
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1591
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Marković, Saša",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U radu se analizira primena pojedinih alternativnih sankcija i mera u praksi, kao i uloga policije
u sistemu izvršenja istih, sa posebnim akcentom na kontrolu izvršenja kućnog zatvora, uslovne
osude sa zaštitnim nadzorom, uslovne osude koja se može opozvati ako dođe do kršenja mere
bezbednosti „zabrane prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ i „kućnog pritvora“.
Tako usmereno istraživanje imalo je za cilj da se u metodološki ispravnom postupku identifikuju
i naučno opišu ključni problemi u postupanju državnih organa i ustanova koje izriču, sprovode
i vrše kontrolu nad izvršenjem vanzavodskih sankcija i mera propisanih zakonom. Primenom
metoda analize sadržaja, statističkog metoda, komparativne i formalno-logičke analize u radu
je analizirano više primera iz prakse suda, poverničke službe i Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova
uporedo sa analizom rezultata aktuelnih teorijskih istraživanja i relevantnih pravnih propisa i
akata. Kao ključni problemi identifikovane su nedorečenosti u postupcima: izricanja i određivanja
alternativnih sankcija i mera, njihovom sprovođenju i kontroli izvršenja. Zaključcima izvedenim
sintezom tih rezultata kao ključni uzroci opisanih problema potvrđeni su: 1) nedonošenje ili
neblagovremeno donošenje podzakonskih propisa i 2) selektivna primena zakona. Posledica
uočenih problema je nizak stepen zaštite žrtve i neostvarivanje ciljeva specijalne prevencije, The author analyses the application of certain alternative criminal sanctions and measures in
practice, as well as the role of the police in the enforcement system, with a special emphasis on
the control of the execution of house arrest, conditional sentence with protective supervision,
the conditional sentence that may be repelled if the security measure is breached, the ban on
attending certain sports events, as well as house arrest. Such a study aimed at identify and
scientifically describe, in the proper methodological procedure, the key problems in the practice
of state authorities and institutions imposing, enforcing and controlling the enforcement of
extra-carceral sanctions and measures prescribed by the Law. By applying the method of content
analysis, statistical method, comparative and formal and logical analysis, the author has
examined several examples from the practice of courts, the commissioner’s department and the
Ministry of Interior. In parallel, he analyzed the results of the current theoretical research and the
relevant legislation. The key issues that were identified is the ambiguity of procedure: the imposing
and ordering alternative sanctions and measures, the implementation and control thereof. The
conclusion confirmed the roots of the said above described problems: 1) the failure to adopt or
timely adopt the proper bylaws and 2) selective application of the Law. The consequences is a low
level of protection of the victims and the failure to achieve the goals of special prevention.",
publisher = "Beograd : Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji",
journal = "Alternativne krivične sankcije : (regionalna krivična zakonodavstva, iskustva u primeni i mere unapređenja)",
booktitle = "Uloga policije u sistemu izvršenja alternativnih sankcija i mera, The role of the police in the system of enforcement of alternative sanctions and measures",
pages = "299-314",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1591"
}

Marković, S.. (2018). Uloga policije u sistemu izvršenja alternativnih sankcija i mera. in Alternativne krivične sankcije : (regionalna krivična zakonodavstva, iskustva u primeni i mere unapređenja)
Beograd : Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji., 299-314.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1591

Marković S. Uloga policije u sistemu izvršenja alternativnih sankcija i mera. in Alternativne krivične sankcije : (regionalna krivična zakonodavstva, iskustva u primeni i mere unapređenja). 2018;:299-314.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1591 .

Marković, Saša, "Uloga policije u sistemu izvršenja alternativnih sankcija i mera" in Alternativne krivične sankcije : (regionalna krivična zakonodavstva, iskustva u primeni i mere unapređenja) (2018):299-314,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1591 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1584
AB  - Skoro dve decenije u Srbiji se nasilju u porodici posvećuje ogromna pažnja.
Ova tema je naročito bila aktuelna tokom 2016. i sada tokom 2017. godine, u vreme javne rasprave, donošenja i početka primene Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u
porodici. Svakodnevno u kolumnama udarne vesti se odnose na nasilje među članovima porodice, naročito osoba muškog pola nad ženama i decom. Ishod nasilja je često lišenje života članova porodice, odnosno ubistvo i/ili samoubistvo.
Na skupu predstavnika državnih organa i nevladinih organizacija koji je održan
2016. godine povodom Međunarodnog dana borbe protiv nasilja nad ženama (25.
novembar) rečeno je da je u poslednjih deset godina u Srbiji ubijeno 327 žena u
porodičnom nasilju. Po podacima MUP-a koji su proistekli iz krivičnih prijava u
poslednje dve godine (2015. i 2016) ubijeno je 57 lica u porodičnom nasilju. Tom
broju treba dodati i broj lišenja života gde je učinilac izvršio samoubistvo odmah
nakon ubistva, pa nije podneta krivična prijava. 
Da li su hitne mere imaju preventivnu ili represivnu ulogu? Da li je njihovo izricanje postalo dominantan način sprečavanja i suzbijanja nasilja u porodici?
Kakvi su prvi efekti ovakvog načina rada državnih organa, pre svega policije, javnog tužilaštva i suda? Da li je ugroženo pravo na slobodu mogućeg učinioca? Na
ova pitanja pokušaćemo da damo odgovor u narednom delu rada.
AB  - In Serbia, for last two decades, domestic violence is getting huge attention. This subject was especially going in 2016. and now in 2017, during public debate of passing and application of the Law for stooping domestic violence. Every day you can read in newspapers about domestic violence, especially a man who is hurting woman and children. The outcome of violence is very often depraving of life, a murder and a suicide. In Serbia, for last ten years, 327 women were murdered in domestic violence. According to Ministry of Internal Affairs data, gotten from criminal charges for last two years (2015. and 2016.), 57 persons were murdered in domestic violence. We should add to this number, the number of depraving of life, where the executor has committed suicide, right after the murder, and there was no a criminal charge. In criminal - legal terms, the results, that have gotten in research, confirm the fact that the refusal of criminal charges, by applying opportunities, is the way to resolve the subject by Public Prosecutor’s Office, and conditional sentence became a dominant way of sanction for criminal act, domestic violence - two third of sentences are conditional sentences. The response of Executive and Legislative Authority for those Criminal policy results, is new law whose purpose is to prevent - stop domestic violence. The author of the work tried to respond to next questions: Do emergency measures have preventive or repressive role? Did their pronouncing become dominant way to prevent and stop domestic violence? How are the first effects of this way of State Authorities work, primarily the Police, the Public Prosecutor’s office and the Court? Is the right to freedom of possible perpetrator jeopardized? Is the number of discovered domestic violence cases is less, for first two months of application of the law, than in previous period?
PB  - Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije
T2  - Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravedno pravo i stvarnost, T. 1, [30. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2017. godine]
T1  - Novi Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i zaštita prava na život
T1  - New Law for stopping domestic violence and protection of the right to life
VL  - God. 66, knj. 599
IS  - br. 9
SP  - 249
EP  - 264
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1584
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Marković, Saša",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Skoro dve decenije u Srbiji se nasilju u porodici posvećuje ogromna pažnja.
Ova tema je naročito bila aktuelna tokom 2016. i sada tokom 2017. godine, u vreme javne rasprave, donošenja i početka primene Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u
porodici. Svakodnevno u kolumnama udarne vesti se odnose na nasilje među članovima porodice, naročito osoba muškog pola nad ženama i decom. Ishod nasilja je često lišenje života članova porodice, odnosno ubistvo i/ili samoubistvo.
Na skupu predstavnika državnih organa i nevladinih organizacija koji je održan
2016. godine povodom Međunarodnog dana borbe protiv nasilja nad ženama (25.
novembar) rečeno je da je u poslednjih deset godina u Srbiji ubijeno 327 žena u
porodičnom nasilju. Po podacima MUP-a koji su proistekli iz krivičnih prijava u
poslednje dve godine (2015. i 2016) ubijeno je 57 lica u porodičnom nasilju. Tom
broju treba dodati i broj lišenja života gde je učinilac izvršio samoubistvo odmah
nakon ubistva, pa nije podneta krivična prijava. 
Da li su hitne mere imaju preventivnu ili represivnu ulogu? Da li je njihovo izricanje postalo dominantan način sprečavanja i suzbijanja nasilja u porodici?
Kakvi su prvi efekti ovakvog načina rada državnih organa, pre svega policije, javnog tužilaštva i suda? Da li je ugroženo pravo na slobodu mogućeg učinioca? Na
ova pitanja pokušaćemo da damo odgovor u narednom delu rada., In Serbia, for last two decades, domestic violence is getting huge attention. This subject was especially going in 2016. and now in 2017, during public debate of passing and application of the Law for stooping domestic violence. Every day you can read in newspapers about domestic violence, especially a man who is hurting woman and children. The outcome of violence is very often depraving of life, a murder and a suicide. In Serbia, for last ten years, 327 women were murdered in domestic violence. According to Ministry of Internal Affairs data, gotten from criminal charges for last two years (2015. and 2016.), 57 persons were murdered in domestic violence. We should add to this number, the number of depraving of life, where the executor has committed suicide, right after the murder, and there was no a criminal charge. In criminal - legal terms, the results, that have gotten in research, confirm the fact that the refusal of criminal charges, by applying opportunities, is the way to resolve the subject by Public Prosecutor’s Office, and conditional sentence became a dominant way of sanction for criminal act, domestic violence - two third of sentences are conditional sentences. The response of Executive and Legislative Authority for those Criminal policy results, is new law whose purpose is to prevent - stop domestic violence. The author of the work tried to respond to next questions: Do emergency measures have preventive or repressive role? Did their pronouncing become dominant way to prevent and stop domestic violence? How are the first effects of this way of State Authorities work, primarily the Police, the Public Prosecutor’s office and the Court? Is the right to freedom of possible perpetrator jeopardized? Is the number of discovered domestic violence cases is less, for first two months of application of the law, than in previous period?",
publisher = "Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije",
journal = "Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravedno pravo i stvarnost, T. 1, [30. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2017. godine]",
title = "Novi Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i zaštita prava na život, New Law for stopping domestic violence and protection of the right to life",
volume = "God. 66, knj. 599",
number = "br. 9",
pages = "249-264",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1584"
}

Marković, S.. (2017). Novi Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i zaštita prava na život. in Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravedno pravo i stvarnost, T. 1, [30. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2017. godine]
Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije., God. 66, knj. 599(br. 9), 249-264.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1584

Marković S. Novi Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i zaštita prava na život. in Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravedno pravo i stvarnost, T. 1, [30. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2017. godine]. 2017;God. 66, knj. 599(br. 9):249-264.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1584 .

Marković, Saša, "Novi Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i zaštita prava na život" in Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravedno pravo i stvarnost, T. 1, [30. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2017. godine], God. 66, knj. 599, no. br. 9 (2017):249-264,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1584 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1576
AB  - Unauthorized production and trafficking of narcotic drugs is a criminal
offense the Police and the Public Prosecution Office separate significant material and
human resources for its prevention.This work is primarly about crime analysis, i.e.
problems in collecting the evidence and difficulty in determining the elements of the
offense. In this particular prosecutorial and police work in practice, a large number
of problems are diagnosed. The offenses related to abuse of narcotic drugs due to
imprecise law formulations often provide inadequate qualification and application of
the provision of the Criminal Code favourable for the perpetrator. As we shall see,
very often it is proved that they committed the criminal offense under Article 246 or
its qualification into 246a as a lump term of these provisions provide relatively simple
qualification of use of narcotic drugs for personal use, without any drug dealing. In
practice we have a large number of cases where “drug dealers” are convicted in a
short time for possession of various narcotic drugs (cocaine, heroin, amphetamines,
marijuana, etc.) for “personal use”. A number of questions can be asked. Did the police
and other criminal authorities use all possible ways to prove the unauthorized sale of
narcotics? Is it necessary to make changes and amendments of the specified Criminal
Code provisions to make them more precise? Does the number of different kinds of
addicts (drug addicts) who consume more types of narcotic drugs increase? We will
try to answers these questions and through examples from Court practice show the
work of the police, public prosecutors and judges in detecting and proving the illicit
traffic of narcotic drugs.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija = Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies
C3  - Dani Arčibalda Rajsa : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : međunarodni naučni skup, Beograd, 10-11. mart 2016. T. 1 = Archibald Reiss Days : Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance : International Scientific Conference, Belgrade, 10-11 March 2016. Vol. 1
T1  - Problems in court practice with determining certain elements of the offenses under the article 246 and 246a of the criminal code of Serbia
SP  - 132
EP  - 149
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1576
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Marković, Saša",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Unauthorized production and trafficking of narcotic drugs is a criminal
offense the Police and the Public Prosecution Office separate significant material and
human resources for its prevention.This work is primarly about crime analysis, i.e.
problems in collecting the evidence and difficulty in determining the elements of the
offense. In this particular prosecutorial and police work in practice, a large number
of problems are diagnosed. The offenses related to abuse of narcotic drugs due to
imprecise law formulations often provide inadequate qualification and application of
the provision of the Criminal Code favourable for the perpetrator. As we shall see,
very often it is proved that they committed the criminal offense under Article 246 or
its qualification into 246a as a lump term of these provisions provide relatively simple
qualification of use of narcotic drugs for personal use, without any drug dealing. In
practice we have a large number of cases where “drug dealers” are convicted in a
short time for possession of various narcotic drugs (cocaine, heroin, amphetamines,
marijuana, etc.) for “personal use”. A number of questions can be asked. Did the police
and other criminal authorities use all possible ways to prove the unauthorized sale of
narcotics? Is it necessary to make changes and amendments of the specified Criminal
Code provisions to make them more precise? Does the number of different kinds of
addicts (drug addicts) who consume more types of narcotic drugs increase? We will
try to answers these questions and through examples from Court practice show the
work of the police, public prosecutors and judges in detecting and proving the illicit
traffic of narcotic drugs.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija = Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies",
journal = "Dani Arčibalda Rajsa : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : međunarodni naučni skup, Beograd, 10-11. mart 2016. T. 1 = Archibald Reiss Days : Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance : International Scientific Conference, Belgrade, 10-11 March 2016. Vol. 1",
title = "Problems in court practice with determining certain elements of the offenses under the article 246 and 246a of the criminal code of Serbia",
pages = "132-149",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1576"
}

Marković, S.. (2016). Problems in court practice with determining certain elements of the offenses under the article 246 and 246a of the criminal code of Serbia. in Dani Arčibalda Rajsa : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : međunarodni naučni skup, Beograd, 10-11. mart 2016. T. 1 = Archibald Reiss Days : Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance : International Scientific Conference, Belgrade, 10-11 March 2016. Vol. 1
Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija = Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies., 132-149.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1576

Marković S. Problems in court practice with determining certain elements of the offenses under the article 246 and 246a of the criminal code of Serbia. in Dani Arčibalda Rajsa : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : međunarodni naučni skup, Beograd, 10-11. mart 2016. T. 1 = Archibald Reiss Days : Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance : International Scientific Conference, Belgrade, 10-11 March 2016. Vol. 1. 2016;:132-149.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1576 .

Marković, Saša, "Problems in court practice with determining certain elements of the offenses under the article 246 and 246a of the criminal code of Serbia" in Dani Arčibalda Rajsa : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : međunarodni naučni skup, Beograd, 10-11. mart 2016. T. 1 = Archibald Reiss Days : Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance : International Scientific Conference, Belgrade, 10-11 March 2016. Vol. 1 (2016):132-149,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1576 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1574
AB  - Ilegalno posedovanje i promet oružja je uvek aktuelna tema, posmatrajući institucionalne i pravne kapacitete države, ali i pitanje prestiža u kriminalnim sredinama. Dodatni problem predstavlja činjenica da je velika količina oružja nakon završenih oružanih sukoba, kojih je bilo dosta kroz istoriju srpskog naroda, ostajala u posedu građana. Tako oružje - najčešće legalno dobijeno od organa državne vlasti, prelazi u ilegalni posed jer država nema evidencije o istom. Oružje u ilegalnom posedu, mnogo češće od onog u legalnom posedu, postaje sredstvo izvršenja najtežih krivičnih dela, ali i objekat radnje. Razlog je lako uočljiv - teško mu je ući u trag. Kako bi se smanjila količina takvog oružja u posedu građana država primenjuje različit spektar mera. Kada je reč o uređivanju pravne materije legalnog posedovanja oružja prima ratio je Zakon o oružju i municiji (ZOOM). Pored otkrivanja i dokazivanja krivičnih dela i prekršaja, policiji je dat još niz ovlašćenja i nadležnosti preventivnog i represivnog karaktera koje Zakon o policiji nije propisao.1 Zakonska legalizacija je jedan od načina kada, na osnovu člana 46. ZOOM, ministar unutrašnjih poslova raspisuje legalizaciju oružja i municije. Međutim, u nekim slučajevima potrebno je reagovati krivičnopravnim odredbama. U članu 348. Krivičnog zakonika (KZ) propisano je krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija. U ovom radu bavićemo se kriminalističkom i krivičnopravnom analizom ovog krivičnog dela, pri čemu ćemo sagledati i teorijske i praktične aspekte. Takođe, ukazaćemo i na kaznenu politiku (zakonodavnu i sudsku) u periodu od 2010-2014. godine za ovo krivično delo.
AB  - Unlawful possession and trade of weapons is always a topical issue, in terms of institutional
and legal capacities of a state, as well as a matter of prestige in criminal circles. Additional problem
is the fact that a vast amount of weapons, after armed conflicts –and there has been a lot of them
throughout the history of Serbian nation – has remained in the possession of the citizens. Such
weapons – most often legally obtained from the state authorities – have moved to illegal possession since the state did not have any records on them. Illegally possessed weapons, more frequently
than those legally possessed, become means of execution of most serious criminal offences, as well
as the object of actus reus. The reason is obvious – it is difficult to trace them. In order to decrease
the amount of such weapons in possession of the citizens, the state applies a range of measures.
When it comes to regulating legal matter on unlawful possession of weapons, prima ratio is the Law
on Weapons and Ammunition. Legal amnesty is one of the ways of legalization of weapons, when
based on the Article 46 of this Law, the Minister of Interior declares a weapon and ammunition amnesty. However, in some cases it is necessary to react by applying criminal law provisions. The Article 348 of the Criminal Code provides for the criminal offence Unlawful Manufacture, Possession, Carrying, and Sale of Weapons and Explosives. In this paper, the authors have dealt with the criminalistic and criminal law analysis of this criminal offence, by considering its theoretical and practical aspects. In addition, the authors have analysed the penal policy as well, both legislative and judiciary, for the period 2010–2014.
PB  - Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije
T2  - Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravo i društveni imperativi, T. 1, [29. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2016. godine]
T1  - Krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija : kriminalistička i krivično-pravna analiza
T1  - Criminal offence of unlawful manufacture, possession, carrying, and sale of weapons and explosives : Criminalistic and criminal law analysis of the
VL  - God. 65, knj. 583
IS  - br. 9
SP  - 251
EP  - 265
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1574
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Marković, Saša",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Ilegalno posedovanje i promet oružja je uvek aktuelna tema, posmatrajući institucionalne i pravne kapacitete države, ali i pitanje prestiža u kriminalnim sredinama. Dodatni problem predstavlja činjenica da je velika količina oružja nakon završenih oružanih sukoba, kojih je bilo dosta kroz istoriju srpskog naroda, ostajala u posedu građana. Tako oružje - najčešće legalno dobijeno od organa državne vlasti, prelazi u ilegalni posed jer država nema evidencije o istom. Oružje u ilegalnom posedu, mnogo češće od onog u legalnom posedu, postaje sredstvo izvršenja najtežih krivičnih dela, ali i objekat radnje. Razlog je lako uočljiv - teško mu je ući u trag. Kako bi se smanjila količina takvog oružja u posedu građana država primenjuje različit spektar mera. Kada je reč o uređivanju pravne materije legalnog posedovanja oružja prima ratio je Zakon o oružju i municiji (ZOOM). Pored otkrivanja i dokazivanja krivičnih dela i prekršaja, policiji je dat još niz ovlašćenja i nadležnosti preventivnog i represivnog karaktera koje Zakon o policiji nije propisao.1 Zakonska legalizacija je jedan od načina kada, na osnovu člana 46. ZOOM, ministar unutrašnjih poslova raspisuje legalizaciju oružja i municije. Međutim, u nekim slučajevima potrebno je reagovati krivičnopravnim odredbama. U članu 348. Krivičnog zakonika (KZ) propisano je krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija. U ovom radu bavićemo se kriminalističkom i krivičnopravnom analizom ovog krivičnog dela, pri čemu ćemo sagledati i teorijske i praktične aspekte. Takođe, ukazaćemo i na kaznenu politiku (zakonodavnu i sudsku) u periodu od 2010-2014. godine za ovo krivično delo., Unlawful possession and trade of weapons is always a topical issue, in terms of institutional
and legal capacities of a state, as well as a matter of prestige in criminal circles. Additional problem
is the fact that a vast amount of weapons, after armed conflicts –and there has been a lot of them
throughout the history of Serbian nation – has remained in the possession of the citizens. Such
weapons – most often legally obtained from the state authorities – have moved to illegal possession since the state did not have any records on them. Illegally possessed weapons, more frequently
than those legally possessed, become means of execution of most serious criminal offences, as well
as the object of actus reus. The reason is obvious – it is difficult to trace them. In order to decrease
the amount of such weapons in possession of the citizens, the state applies a range of measures.
When it comes to regulating legal matter on unlawful possession of weapons, prima ratio is the Law
on Weapons and Ammunition. Legal amnesty is one of the ways of legalization of weapons, when
based on the Article 46 of this Law, the Minister of Interior declares a weapon and ammunition amnesty. However, in some cases it is necessary to react by applying criminal law provisions. The Article 348 of the Criminal Code provides for the criminal offence Unlawful Manufacture, Possession, Carrying, and Sale of Weapons and Explosives. In this paper, the authors have dealt with the criminalistic and criminal law analysis of this criminal offence, by considering its theoretical and practical aspects. In addition, the authors have analysed the penal policy as well, both legislative and judiciary, for the period 2010–2014.",
publisher = "Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije",
journal = "Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravo i društveni imperativi, T. 1, [29. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2016. godine]",
title = "Krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija : kriminalistička i krivično-pravna analiza, Criminal offence of unlawful manufacture, possession, carrying, and sale of weapons and explosives : Criminalistic and criminal law analysis of the",
volume = "God. 65, knj. 583",
number = "br. 9",
pages = "251-265",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1574"
}

Marković, S.. (2016). Krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija : kriminalistička i krivično-pravna analiza. in Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravo i društveni imperativi, T. 1, [29. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2016. godine]
Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije., God. 65, knj. 583(br. 9), 251-265.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1574

Marković S. Krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija : kriminalistička i krivično-pravna analiza. in Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravo i društveni imperativi, T. 1, [29. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2016. godine]. 2016;God. 65, knj. 583(br. 9):251-265.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1574 .

Marković, Saša, "Krivično delo nedozvoljene proizvodnje, držanja, nošenja i prometa oružja i eksplozivnih materija : kriminalistička i krivično-pravna analiza" in Pravni život : časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu. - Tematski broj: Pravo i društveni imperativi, T. 1, [29. susret pravnika Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 13-17. decembar 2016. godine], God. 65, knj. 583, no. br. 9 (2016):251-265,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1574 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1133
AB  - Zakonom o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika
Republike Srbije iz 2009. godine, prvi put, u sistem krivičnih sankcija
uvedena je mera bezbednosti „zabrana prisustvovanja određenim
sportskim priredbama“.3 Ratio legis zakonodavca je bio efikasna
i intenzivna borba protiv nasilja na sportskim takmičenjima. U
ovom radu prikazaćemo, na primerima iz prakse, na koji način
se primenjuje ova mera bezbednosti, i koji su pozitivni, odnosno
negativni efekti ovakvog zakonskog regulisanja mera usmerenih
na suzbijanje nasilja na sportskim priredbama u Republici Srbiji.
Takođe, izvršićemo analizu sudskih presuda, donetih na teritoriji
Kolubarskog upravnog okruga od trenutka stupanja na snagu
ovog člana zakona do danas, kojima su izrečene mere bezbednosti
„zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“.
Analiziraćemo i načine (ne)izvršenja pojedinih sudskih odluka,
zbog mnogobrojnih objektivnih i subjektivnih razloga. Kroz rad
ćemo se posebno osvrnuti na postupanje policije, koja je zadužena
za praćenje izvršenje mera bezbednosti, odnosno obaveštavanje
suda o sprovođenju donetih presuda, kao i na reakciju suda na
obaveštenja da se njihove pravnosnažne odluke ne sprovode. Na kraju ćemo odgovoriti na postavljeno pitanje i zaključiti da li je
suzbijanje nasilja na sportskim priredbama efikasno u našem
pravnom sistemu.
AB  - The Law Amending the Criminal Code of the Republic
 of Serbia of 2009 has introduced for the first time the safety
 measure “Ban on Attendance at Certain Sporting Events” in Serbian
 criminal sanctions system. Ratio legis of the legislator was efficient
 and intense fight against violence at sporting events. This paper will
 present, using the practical examples, in which way this measure
 is implemented, as well as what positive and negative effects are
 of such a legal regulation of measures directed at suppression of
 violence at sporting events in the Republic of Serbia. Also, we shall
 analyze the court decisions reached in the territory of Kolubara
 District from the moment when this Article of the Law came into
 effect until today, which delivered the safety measure of “Ban on
 Attendance at Certain Sporting Events”. We shall also analyze the
 manners of carrying out or failures to carry out certain judicial
 decisions due to many objective and subjective reasons. We shall
 particularly give a review of the actions of the police, who are in
 charge of monitoring the implementation of safety measures, i.e.
 notifying the court on the implementation of the judicial decisions,
 as well as of the response by the court to the notification that their
 final judgments are not carried out. Finally, we shall answer the
 question posed and conclude whether the suppression of violence
 at sporting events is efficient within our legal system.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
T2  - NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - Mera bezbednosti „Zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ u praksi policije i pravosuđa
T1  - Safety measure “Ban on Attendance at Certain Sporting Events” in practice of police and the judiciary
VL  - 21
IS  - 1
SP  - 133
EP  - 160
DO  - doi:10.5937/NBP1601133M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Marković, Saša",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Zakonom o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika
Republike Srbije iz 2009. godine, prvi put, u sistem krivičnih sankcija
uvedena je mera bezbednosti „zabrana prisustvovanja određenim
sportskim priredbama“.3 Ratio legis zakonodavca je bio efikasna
i intenzivna borba protiv nasilja na sportskim takmičenjima. U
ovom radu prikazaćemo, na primerima iz prakse, na koji način
se primenjuje ova mera bezbednosti, i koji su pozitivni, odnosno
negativni efekti ovakvog zakonskog regulisanja mera usmerenih
na suzbijanje nasilja na sportskim priredbama u Republici Srbiji.
Takođe, izvršićemo analizu sudskih presuda, donetih na teritoriji
Kolubarskog upravnog okruga od trenutka stupanja na snagu
ovog člana zakona do danas, kojima su izrečene mere bezbednosti
„zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“.
Analiziraćemo i načine (ne)izvršenja pojedinih sudskih odluka,
zbog mnogobrojnih objektivnih i subjektivnih razloga. Kroz rad
ćemo se posebno osvrnuti na postupanje policije, koja je zadužena
za praćenje izvršenje mera bezbednosti, odnosno obaveštavanje
suda o sprovođenju donetih presuda, kao i na reakciju suda na
obaveštenja da se njihove pravnosnažne odluke ne sprovode. Na kraju ćemo odgovoriti na postavljeno pitanje i zaključiti da li je
suzbijanje nasilja na sportskim priredbama efikasno u našem
pravnom sistemu., The Law Amending the Criminal Code of the Republic
 of Serbia of 2009 has introduced for the first time the safety
 measure “Ban on Attendance at Certain Sporting Events” in Serbian
 criminal sanctions system. Ratio legis of the legislator was efficient
 and intense fight against violence at sporting events. This paper will
 present, using the practical examples, in which way this measure
 is implemented, as well as what positive and negative effects are
 of such a legal regulation of measures directed at suppression of
 violence at sporting events in the Republic of Serbia. Also, we shall
 analyze the court decisions reached in the territory of Kolubara
 District from the moment when this Article of the Law came into
 effect until today, which delivered the safety measure of “Ban on
 Attendance at Certain Sporting Events”. We shall also analyze the
 manners of carrying out or failures to carry out certain judicial
 decisions due to many objective and subjective reasons. We shall
 particularly give a review of the actions of the police, who are in
 charge of monitoring the implementation of safety measures, i.e.
 notifying the court on the implementation of the judicial decisions,
 as well as of the response by the court to the notification that their
 final judgments are not carried out. Finally, we shall answer the
 question posed and conclude whether the suppression of violence
 at sporting events is efficient within our legal system.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija",
journal = "NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "Mera bezbednosti „Zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ u praksi policije i pravosuđa, Safety measure “Ban on Attendance at Certain Sporting Events” in practice of police and the judiciary",
volume = "21",
number = "1",
pages = "133-160",
doi = "doi:10.5937/NBP1601133M"
}

Marković, S.. (2016). Mera bezbednosti „Zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ u praksi policije i pravosuđa. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija., 21(1), 133-160.
https://doi.org/doi:10.5937/NBP1601133M

Marković S. Mera bezbednosti „Zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ u praksi policije i pravosuđa. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2016;21(1):133-160.
doi:doi:10.5937/NBP1601133M .

Marković, Saša, "Mera bezbednosti „Zabrana prisustvovanja određenim sportskim priredbama“ u praksi policije i pravosuđa" in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 21, no. 1 (2016):133-160,
https://doi.org/doi:10.5937/NBP1601133M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1092
AB  - Poslednjih godina u našoj zemlji sve više je prisutan problem preopterećenosti postojećih zatvorskih kapaciteta i s tim u vezi teškoće vezane za samo izvršenje kazne zatvora. Razlozi leže u sve većem broju izreženih zatvorskih kazni i njihovom dužem trajanju i povećanom broju pritvorenih lica, a sa druge strane u nedovoljnom broju i kapacitetu ustanova za izdržavanje ove kazne koji nije pratio ovo povećanje. Moguća rešenja ovog problema mogu se kretati u dva pravca: jedan, izgradnja novih smeštajnih kapaciteta i rekonstrukcija starih, i drugi, izmene u kaznenoj politici sudova. No to nikako ne bi smelo da znači da zbog tehničkog problema kakav je nedostatak zatvorskih kapaciteta sudovi treba da koriguju svoju kaznenu politiku u smislu njenog ublažavanja. Rešenje čini nam se leži u boljem korišćenju postojećih mogućnosti za zamenu kazne zatvora drugim sankcijama (novčana kazna, rad u javnom interesu, kućni zatvor), pre svega kada su u pitanju kratkotrajne kazne zatvora, kao i u adekvatnijoj primeni instituta uslovnog otpusta. U poslednje vreme pojedinim novih zakonskim rešenjima stvoreni su uslovi za bolju primenu ovih krivičnih sankcija i instituta, što bi moglo da doprinese rešavanju ili bar ublažavanju ovog novonastalog problema.
AB  - In recent years, there is a growing problem of prison overload and therefore difficulties associated with execution of imprisonment in our country. The
 reasons lie in increasing numbers of prison sentences and their longer duration
 as well as increased number of detainees, and on the other hand - insufficient
 capacity of existing institutions for serving the sentence, that did not follow this
 increase. Possible solutions to this problem can be found within two directions:
 one, construction of new capacities and reconstruction of old ones, or - changing the penal policy of the courts. However, this should not by any mean result
 with courts update their criminal policy in terms of its mitigation because of
 technical problem such as shortage of capacity. The solution seems to lie in better use of the existing possibilities for replacement of prison sentence with other
 sanctions (fines, community service, house arrest), especially when it comes to
 short-term imprisonment, as well as to adequate application of parole. Lately,
 some new legal solutions and conditions were introduced for better implementation of these criminal sanctions and institutes, which could contribute to solving or at least help reducing this problem.
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema
T1  - Problem of prison overload and possibile solutions
VL  - 53
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 75
EP  - 91
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Poslednjih godina u našoj zemlji sve više je prisutan problem preopterećenosti postojećih zatvorskih kapaciteta i s tim u vezi teškoće vezane za samo izvršenje kazne zatvora. Razlozi leže u sve većem broju izreženih zatvorskih kazni i njihovom dužem trajanju i povećanom broju pritvorenih lica, a sa druge strane u nedovoljnom broju i kapacitetu ustanova za izdržavanje ove kazne koji nije pratio ovo povećanje. Moguća rešenja ovog problema mogu se kretati u dva pravca: jedan, izgradnja novih smeštajnih kapaciteta i rekonstrukcija starih, i drugi, izmene u kaznenoj politici sudova. No to nikako ne bi smelo da znači da zbog tehničkog problema kakav je nedostatak zatvorskih kapaciteta sudovi treba da koriguju svoju kaznenu politiku u smislu njenog ublažavanja. Rešenje čini nam se leži u boljem korišćenju postojećih mogućnosti za zamenu kazne zatvora drugim sankcijama (novčana kazna, rad u javnom interesu, kućni zatvor), pre svega kada su u pitanju kratkotrajne kazne zatvora, kao i u adekvatnijoj primeni instituta uslovnog otpusta. U poslednje vreme pojedinim novih zakonskim rešenjima stvoreni su uslovi za bolju primenu ovih krivičnih sankcija i instituta, što bi moglo da doprinese rešavanju ili bar ublažavanju ovog novonastalog problema., In recent years, there is a growing problem of prison overload and therefore difficulties associated with execution of imprisonment in our country. The
 reasons lie in increasing numbers of prison sentences and their longer duration
 as well as increased number of detainees, and on the other hand - insufficient
 capacity of existing institutions for serving the sentence, that did not follow this
 increase. Possible solutions to this problem can be found within two directions:
 one, construction of new capacities and reconstruction of old ones, or - changing the penal policy of the courts. However, this should not by any mean result
 with courts update their criminal policy in terms of its mitigation because of
 technical problem such as shortage of capacity. The solution seems to lie in better use of the existing possibilities for replacement of prison sentence with other
 sanctions (fines, community service, house arrest), especially when it comes to
 short-term imprisonment, as well as to adequate application of parole. Lately,
 some new legal solutions and conditions were introduced for better implementation of these criminal sanctions and institutes, which could contribute to solving or at least help reducing this problem.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema, Problem of prison overload and possibile solutions",
volume = "53",
number = "2-3",
pages = "75-91",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2015). Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Beograd : Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja., 53(2-3), 75-91.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092

Đorđević Đ. Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2015;53(2-3):75-91.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 53, no. 2-3 (2015):75-91,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1132
AB  - Naziv rada u celini ukazuje na njegovu sadržinu. Ali to
nije sve. Autorka će se u svakom delu osvrnuti i na razmišljanja
profesora Ljubiše Lazarevića koji se još 2000. godine bavio ovom
temom i objavio rad pod nazivom „Ubistva u jugoslovenskom
krivičnom zakonodavstvu – de lege lata i de lege ferenda“. Rasprava
u ovom članku je podeljena u tri celine. Prva ukazuje na pravo na
život kao objekat krivičnopravne zaštite i u tom kontekstu autorka
ukazuje na društveni, pravni i kriminalno-politički značaj krivičnog
dela ubistva. Druga celina ukazuje na najznačajnije aspekte
pozitivnopravnih propisa, tj. regulative koja se odnosi na krivična
dela ubistva u našem krivičnom pravu. I konačno, treći deo, po svom
značaju dominantan, sadrži konkretne predloge de lege ferenda koji
se odnose na inkriminisanje ubistava.
AB  - The title of the paper fully indicates its content. However,
that is not all. The author will also address considerations of Professor
Ljubiša Lazarević, who dealt with this topic in 2000 and published a
paper entitled “Murders in the Yugoslav Criminal Legislation – de
lege lata and de lege ferenda“. The paper is divided into three sections.
The first one points to the right to life as the subject of criminal law
protection, and in this regard, the author points at social, legal,
criminal and political significance of the criminal offence of murder.
The second section points to the most important aspects of legal
regulations that govern the criminal offences of murder in our
criminal law. Finally, the third section of the paper, the dominant one
given its significance, contains concrete suggestions de lege ferenda
related to the criminalization of murders.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
T2  - NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - Krivična dela ubistva : de lege lata i de lege ferenda
T1  - Criminal offences of murder : de lege lata and de lege ferenda
VL  - 20
IS  - 2
SP  - 145
EP  - 165
EP  - 
DO  - 10.5937/NBP1502145K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kolarić, Dragana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Naziv rada u celini ukazuje na njegovu sadržinu. Ali to
nije sve. Autorka će se u svakom delu osvrnuti i na razmišljanja
profesora Ljubiše Lazarevića koji se još 2000. godine bavio ovom
temom i objavio rad pod nazivom „Ubistva u jugoslovenskom
krivičnom zakonodavstvu – de lege lata i de lege ferenda“. Rasprava
u ovom članku je podeljena u tri celine. Prva ukazuje na pravo na
život kao objekat krivičnopravne zaštite i u tom kontekstu autorka
ukazuje na društveni, pravni i kriminalno-politički značaj krivičnog
dela ubistva. Druga celina ukazuje na najznačajnije aspekte
pozitivnopravnih propisa, tj. regulative koja se odnosi na krivična
dela ubistva u našem krivičnom pravu. I konačno, treći deo, po svom
značaju dominantan, sadrži konkretne predloge de lege ferenda koji
se odnose na inkriminisanje ubistava., The title of the paper fully indicates its content. However,
that is not all. The author will also address considerations of Professor
Ljubiša Lazarević, who dealt with this topic in 2000 and published a
paper entitled “Murders in the Yugoslav Criminal Legislation – de
lege lata and de lege ferenda“. The paper is divided into three sections.
The first one points to the right to life as the subject of criminal law
protection, and in this regard, the author points at social, legal,
criminal and political significance of the criminal offence of murder.
The second section points to the most important aspects of legal
regulations that govern the criminal offences of murder in our
criminal law. Finally, the third section of the paper, the dominant one
given its significance, contains concrete suggestions de lege ferenda
related to the criminalization of murders.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija",
journal = "NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "Krivična dela ubistva : de lege lata i de lege ferenda, Criminal offences of murder : de lege lata and de lege ferenda",
volume = "20",
number = "2",
pages = "145-165-",
doi = "10.5937/NBP1502145K"
}

Kolarić, D.. (2015). Krivična dela ubistva : de lege lata i de lege ferenda. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija., 20(2), 145-165.
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1502145K

Kolarić D. Krivična dela ubistva : de lege lata i de lege ferenda. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2015;20(2):145-165.
doi:10.5937/NBP1502145K .

Kolarić, Dragana, "Krivična dela ubistva : de lege lata i de lege ferenda" in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 20, no. 2 (2015):145-165,
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1502145K . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1134
AB  - Nasilje u porodici je tema koja je zaokupljala veliku pažnju
 i kojom su se prvenstveno bavile mnoge nevladine organizacije za
 zaštitu ženskih prava u razvijenim državama Evrope i sveta u drugoj
 polovini prošlog veka, a kod nas je bavljenje ovim društvenim
 problemom dostiglo vrhunac krajem prošlog i početkom 21. veka.
 Međunarodne organizacije (UN, EU), kao i većina razvijenih država
 u svetu, pod pritiskom nevladinog sektora prepoznale su nasilje u
 porodici kao jednu od najvećih savremenih društvenih opasnosti,
 pri čemu su preduzete određene mere, kroz zakonsko određivanje
 ove pojave kao društveno neprihvatljive i društveno opasne, na
 sprečavanju i suzbijanju iste. Pri tome, u većini država nasilje u
 porodici je sankcionisano kroz krivičnopravni sistem. Kod nas je
 izmenama Krivičnog zakonika 2002. godine ova pojava definisana
 kao krivično delo. Međutim, to ne znači da je nasilje u porodici
 bilo dozvoljeno, zato što su i do tada u krivičnom zakonodavstvu
 postojala mnoga krivična dela sa elementima nasilja kroz koja se
 kažnjavalo i nasilje izvršeno u porodici. Imajući u vidu da je ovaj
 broj NBP – Žurnala za kriminalistiku i pravo posvećen profesoru
 Ljubiši Lazareviću, na samom početku ističemo njegovo mišljenje,
 gde on naglašava da je po sredstvima izvršenja i posledici krivično
 delo nasilje u porodici identično sa nekim drugim krivičnim delima,
 kao što su prinuda, teška telesna povreda, laka telesna povreda
 i ugrožavanje sigurnosti, ali da neće postojati njegov idealni sticaj
 sa ovim delima, već samo nasilje u porodici, za koje su, uostalom, propisane i teže kazne.
 Takođe, kod nas je nasilje u porodici
 sankcionisano i kroz prekršajnopravni sistem, i to putem prekršaja sa
 elementima nasilja iz oblasti Zakona o javnom redu i miru. U ovom
 radu bavićemo se načinima suzbijanjem ove pojave kroz eventualno
 vođenje prekršajnog postupka, pri čemu ćemo prikazati prednosti i
 nedostatke ovakvog načina sankcionisanja nasilja u porodici.
AB  - Domestic violence is a topic that has drawn great
attention and that mainly has been the subject of many nongovernmental organizations for the protection of women’s rights in
the developed countries of Europe and the world in the second half
of the last century, while in Serbia, dealing with this social problem
peaked at the turn of 21st century. International organizations (UN,
EU), as well as the majority of developed countries in the world,
under the pressure of the non-governmental sector have recognized
domestic violence as one of the greatest contemporary social threats.
Certain measures to prevent and combat domestic violence have
been undertaken, through the legal defining of these phenomena as
socially unacceptable and socially dangerous. In addition, in most
countries, domestic violence is sanctioned through the criminal
justice system. In Serbia, through the amendments to the Criminal
Code of 2002, this phenomenon has been defined as a criminal
offense. However, this does not mean that domestic violence was
allowed, because even until then the criminal legislation contained
many crimes with elements of violence through which domestic
violence was punished. Taking into account that this number of “NBP
– Journal of Criminalistics and Law” is dedicated to professor Ljubiša
Lazarević, his opinion on this subject should be pointed out – he
emphasized that by means of execution and consequences, criminal
offence of domestic violence is identical with some other criminal
offences, such as coercion, grievous bodily harm, light bodily injury,
endangering safety, but that its ideal concurrence with these offences
would not exist, but only domestic violence, for which, after all,
more severe punishments are prescribed. In addition, in our country,
domestic violence is sanctioned through the misdemeanor system –
through misdemeanors with elements of violence from the area of the
Law on Public Order and Peace. In this paper, the author will discuss
ways to combat this phenomenon through possible misdemeanor
proceedings, and present the advantages and disadvantages of this
way of sanctioning of domestic violence.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
T2  - NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - Uloga policije u suzbijanju nasilja u porodici u prekršajnom postupku
T1  - The role of the police in combating domestic violence in misdemeanor proceedings
VL  - 20
IS  - 2
SP  - 211
EP  - 231
DO  - 10.5937/NBP1502211M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Marković, Saša",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Nasilje u porodici je tema koja je zaokupljala veliku pažnju
 i kojom su se prvenstveno bavile mnoge nevladine organizacije za
 zaštitu ženskih prava u razvijenim državama Evrope i sveta u drugoj
 polovini prošlog veka, a kod nas je bavljenje ovim društvenim
 problemom dostiglo vrhunac krajem prošlog i početkom 21. veka.
 Međunarodne organizacije (UN, EU), kao i većina razvijenih država
 u svetu, pod pritiskom nevladinog sektora prepoznale su nasilje u
 porodici kao jednu od najvećih savremenih društvenih opasnosti,
 pri čemu su preduzete određene mere, kroz zakonsko određivanje
 ove pojave kao društveno neprihvatljive i društveno opasne, na
 sprečavanju i suzbijanju iste. Pri tome, u većini država nasilje u
 porodici je sankcionisano kroz krivičnopravni sistem. Kod nas je
 izmenama Krivičnog zakonika 2002. godine ova pojava definisana
 kao krivično delo. Međutim, to ne znači da je nasilje u porodici
 bilo dozvoljeno, zato što su i do tada u krivičnom zakonodavstvu
 postojala mnoga krivična dela sa elementima nasilja kroz koja se
 kažnjavalo i nasilje izvršeno u porodici. Imajući u vidu da je ovaj
 broj NBP – Žurnala za kriminalistiku i pravo posvećen profesoru
 Ljubiši Lazareviću, na samom početku ističemo njegovo mišljenje,
 gde on naglašava da je po sredstvima izvršenja i posledici krivično
 delo nasilje u porodici identično sa nekim drugim krivičnim delima,
 kao što su prinuda, teška telesna povreda, laka telesna povreda
 i ugrožavanje sigurnosti, ali da neće postojati njegov idealni sticaj
 sa ovim delima, već samo nasilje u porodici, za koje su, uostalom, propisane i teže kazne.
 Takođe, kod nas je nasilje u porodici
 sankcionisano i kroz prekršajnopravni sistem, i to putem prekršaja sa
 elementima nasilja iz oblasti Zakona o javnom redu i miru. U ovom
 radu bavićemo se načinima suzbijanjem ove pojave kroz eventualno
 vođenje prekršajnog postupka, pri čemu ćemo prikazati prednosti i
 nedostatke ovakvog načina sankcionisanja nasilja u porodici., Domestic violence is a topic that has drawn great
attention and that mainly has been the subject of many nongovernmental organizations for the protection of women’s rights in
the developed countries of Europe and the world in the second half
of the last century, while in Serbia, dealing with this social problem
peaked at the turn of 21st century. International organizations (UN,
EU), as well as the majority of developed countries in the world,
under the pressure of the non-governmental sector have recognized
domestic violence as one of the greatest contemporary social threats.
Certain measures to prevent and combat domestic violence have
been undertaken, through the legal defining of these phenomena as
socially unacceptable and socially dangerous. In addition, in most
countries, domestic violence is sanctioned through the criminal
justice system. In Serbia, through the amendments to the Criminal
Code of 2002, this phenomenon has been defined as a criminal
offense. However, this does not mean that domestic violence was
allowed, because even until then the criminal legislation contained
many crimes with elements of violence through which domestic
violence was punished. Taking into account that this number of “NBP
– Journal of Criminalistics and Law” is dedicated to professor Ljubiša
Lazarević, his opinion on this subject should be pointed out – he
emphasized that by means of execution and consequences, criminal
offence of domestic violence is identical with some other criminal
offences, such as coercion, grievous bodily harm, light bodily injury,
endangering safety, but that its ideal concurrence with these offences
would not exist, but only domestic violence, for which, after all,
more severe punishments are prescribed. In addition, in our country,
domestic violence is sanctioned through the misdemeanor system –
through misdemeanors with elements of violence from the area of the
Law on Public Order and Peace. In this paper, the author will discuss
ways to combat this phenomenon through possible misdemeanor
proceedings, and present the advantages and disadvantages of this
way of sanctioning of domestic violence.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija",
journal = "NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "Uloga policije u suzbijanju nasilja u porodici u prekršajnom postupku, The role of the police in combating domestic violence in misdemeanor proceedings",
volume = "20",
number = "2",
pages = "211-231",
doi = "10.5937/NBP1502211M"
}

Marković, S.. (2015). Uloga policije u suzbijanju nasilja u porodici u prekršajnom postupku. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija., 20(2), 211-231.
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1502211M

Marković S. Uloga policije u suzbijanju nasilja u porodici u prekršajnom postupku. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2015;20(2):211-231.
doi:10.5937/NBP1502211M .

Marković, Saša, "Uloga policije u suzbijanju nasilja u porodici u prekršajnom postupku" in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 20, no. 2 (2015):211-231,
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1502211M . .