TY  - CONF
AU  - Mijalković, Saša
AU  - Popović Mančević, Marija
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1330
AB  - National Security Strategy is a document of the highest strategic importance in one state that defines core values, interests, challenges, risks and threats to national security, as well as  the  organization  of  the  national  security  system  and  national  security  policy  in  order  to  secure and achieve national interests. The Republic of Serbia defined its strategic priorities for the  first  time  when  it  adopted  the  first  National  Security  Strategy  in  2009,  and  updated  them  in the new National Security Strategy adopted in 2019. An important part of the first Strategy was the concept of human security, which was indication that the Republic of Serbia formally considered the needs and values of an individual on an equal footing with the values of the state. This  Strategy  was  deemed  to  be  an  expression  of  determination  of  the  Republic  of  Serbia  to  create conditions for improving human security in economic, health, political and other aspects and through transparency, rule of law and responsibility. However, the new Strategy does not explicitly mention human security as a specific part of the integral concept of national security. Furthermore,  it  introduces  several  novelties  that  are  in  contrast  with  the  prevailed  human-centric  mission  of  the  previous  strategy,  and  these  novelties  are  focused  towards  territorial  integrity, sovereignty and other state-centric issues. Bearing this in mind, the questions arising are:  why  this  strategic  turn  was  made  and  what  are  to  be  the  implications  of  this  change  for  human  security.  The  main  hypothesis  is  that  the  strategic  turn  to  state-centrism  instead  of  the  human-centric  approach  promoted  by  the  previous  National  Security  Strategy  was  made  because it corresponds to the global trend of revival of nationalism and sovereignty. However, this indisputably leaves room for criticism because people are the most important factor in the equation of integral national security and disregarding them in the national security strategies and policies can be problematized on multiple levels.
PB  - Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
C3  - Thematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor] / International Scientific Conference "Archibald Reiss Days", Belgrade, 18-19 November 2020.
T1  - National security strategy of the Republic of Serbia and it’s implications for human security
SP  - 355
EP  - 363
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1330
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Mijalković, Saša and Popović Mančević, Marija",
year = "2020",
abstract = "National Security Strategy is a document of the highest strategic importance in one state that defines core values, interests, challenges, risks and threats to national security, as well as  the  organization  of  the  national  security  system  and  national  security  policy  in  order  to  secure and achieve national interests. The Republic of Serbia defined its strategic priorities for the  first  time  when  it  adopted  the  first  National  Security  Strategy  in  2009,  and  updated  them  in the new National Security Strategy adopted in 2019. An important part of the first Strategy was the concept of human security, which was indication that the Republic of Serbia formally considered the needs and values of an individual on an equal footing with the values of the state. This  Strategy  was  deemed  to  be  an  expression  of  determination  of  the  Republic  of  Serbia  to  create conditions for improving human security in economic, health, political and other aspects and through transparency, rule of law and responsibility. However, the new Strategy does not explicitly mention human security as a specific part of the integral concept of national security. Furthermore,  it  introduces  several  novelties  that  are  in  contrast  with  the  prevailed  human-centric  mission  of  the  previous  strategy,  and  these  novelties  are  focused  towards  territorial  integrity, sovereignty and other state-centric issues. Bearing this in mind, the questions arising are:  why  this  strategic  turn  was  made  and  what  are  to  be  the  implications  of  this  change  for  human  security.  The  main  hypothesis  is  that  the  strategic  turn  to  state-centrism  instead  of  the  human-centric  approach  promoted  by  the  previous  National  Security  Strategy  was  made  because it corresponds to the global trend of revival of nationalism and sovereignty. However, this indisputably leaves room for criticism because people are the most important factor in the equation of integral national security and disregarding them in the national security strategies and policies can be problematized on multiple levels.",
publisher = "Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies",
journal = "Thematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor] / International Scientific Conference "Archibald Reiss Days", Belgrade, 18-19 November 2020.",
title = "National security strategy of the Republic of Serbia and it’s implications for human security",
pages = "355-363",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1330"
}

Mijalković, S.,& Popović Mančević, M.. (2020). National security strategy of the Republic of Serbia and it’s implications for human security. in Thematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor] / International Scientific Conference "Archibald Reiss Days", Belgrade, 18-19 November 2020.
Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies., 355-363.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1330

Mijalković S, Popović Mančević M. National security strategy of the Republic of Serbia and it’s implications for human security. in Thematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor] / International Scientific Conference "Archibald Reiss Days", Belgrade, 18-19 November 2020.. 2020;:355-363.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1330 .

Mijalković, Saša, Popović Mančević, Marija, "National security strategy of the Republic of Serbia and it’s implications for human security" in Thematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor] / International Scientific Conference "Archibald Reiss Days", Belgrade, 18-19 November 2020. (2020):355-363,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1330 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mijalković, Saša
AU  - Popović Mančević, Marija
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://nbp.kpu.edu.rs/all-issues/#1614326566164-36487937-5a04
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1308
AB  - The paper reviews the evolution of the ideology and the path of creating the Albanian state in the Balkans, from the moment when it did not exist at all (during the Ottoman Empire) until today, when Albanians live in an internationally recognized state (the Republic of Albania) and in one self-proclaimed state (the so-called “Republic of Kosovo”). In that regard, this paper is based on two theses. According to the first, the focus of the original so-called state-building ideology about the need for all Albanians to live in one state, “Greater Albania”, today is radically changed and diametrically opposed: “Kosovo Albanians” now do not want to join the Republic of Albania, but want an independent state - the so-called “Greater Kosovo”, which would include parts of the territories of central Serbia, Montenegro, Northern Macedonia and Greece where Albanians live. The reason for the essential change of ideology is that the drug bosses of Albanian criminal clans that control the territory of Kosmet, and who were previously commanders of Albanian terrorist organizations, want their own “drug state”, in which they would control all social flows and enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution. The second thesis on which this paper is based is that the attack on the Albanian mafia is at the same time a blow to the so-called quasi-statehood of the so-called Republic of Kosovo, i.e. on the levers of financial power, which is the backing for political power and international support for the so-called Republic of Kosovo.
PB  - Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
T2  - NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - The ideology of “Greater Kosovo” in the vision of Albanian narco-terrorist clans
VL  - 25
IS  - 3
SP  - 31
EP  - 45
DO  - 10.5937/nabepo25-27336
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Mijalković, Saša and Popović Mančević, Marija",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper reviews the evolution of the ideology and the path of creating the Albanian state in the Balkans, from the moment when it did not exist at all (during the Ottoman Empire) until today, when Albanians live in an internationally recognized state (the Republic of Albania) and in one self-proclaimed state (the so-called “Republic of Kosovo”). In that regard, this paper is based on two theses. According to the first, the focus of the original so-called state-building ideology about the need for all Albanians to live in one state, “Greater Albania”, today is radically changed and diametrically opposed: “Kosovo Albanians” now do not want to join the Republic of Albania, but want an independent state - the so-called “Greater Kosovo”, which would include parts of the territories of central Serbia, Montenegro, Northern Macedonia and Greece where Albanians live. The reason for the essential change of ideology is that the drug bosses of Albanian criminal clans that control the territory of Kosmet, and who were previously commanders of Albanian terrorist organizations, want their own “drug state”, in which they would control all social flows and enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution. The second thesis on which this paper is based is that the attack on the Albanian mafia is at the same time a blow to the so-called quasi-statehood of the so-called Republic of Kosovo, i.e. on the levers of financial power, which is the backing for political power and international support for the so-called Republic of Kosovo.",
publisher = "Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies",
journal = "NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "The ideology of “Greater Kosovo” in the vision of Albanian narco-terrorist clans",
volume = "25",
number = "3",
pages = "31-45",
doi = "10.5937/nabepo25-27336"
}

Mijalković, S.,& Popović Mančević, M.. (2020). The ideology of “Greater Kosovo” in the vision of Albanian narco-terrorist clans. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies., 25(3), 31-45.
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-27336

Mijalković S, Popović Mančević M. The ideology of “Greater Kosovo” in the vision of Albanian narco-terrorist clans. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2020;25(3):31-45.
doi:10.5937/nabepo25-27336 .

Mijalković, Saša, Popović Mančević, Marija, "The ideology of “Greater Kosovo” in the vision of Albanian narco-terrorist clans" in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 25, no. 3 (2020):31-45,
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-27336 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cvetković, Vladimir
AU  - Noji, Eric
AU  - Filipović, Marina
AU  - Popović Mančević, Marija
AU  - Kešetović, Želimir
AU  - Radović, Nenad
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/831
AB  - The aim of this paper is to assess the risk of terrorist attacks as perceived by individuals, the local community as a whole, and municipal public safety officials in Belgrade, the capital of the Republic of Serbia. The structured questionnaire about perceived risk of terrorist attacks and preparedness was developed using close-ended, multiple choice questions and questionnaire items featuring 5-point Likert response options. Data were collected between June and September 2017 by a telephone survey using a random digit dialing procedure; 485 adult Serbian residents participated in the research voluntarily. Study participants exhibited low levels of perception vis-a-vis the future likelihood of terrorist attacks occurring in their communities, and only a moderate knowledge of counter-terrorism activities currently being undertaken by public safety authorities. Other responses to our questionnaire indicated statistically significant differences in perception of the risks of terrorism threats in Belgrade with respect to demographic variables such as age, gender, employment and past exposure to major emergencies. We encourage emergency management agencies in Serbia to use the differences in public perception of risks identified in our study to develop enhanced counter-terrorism preparedness measures through the promotion of behavioural change. Such action goes hand-in-hand with the adoption of improved risk management decision-making procedures. Furthermore, to improve risk management decision-making we need to anticipate virtually all possible scenarios because terrorism is now a clear and present danger to the safety of the citizens of Serbia. All cities and towns in Serbia need to have up-to-date disaster plans that are tailored to specific scenarios and locations as opposed to only preconceived generalized plans.
PB  - Ministry Interior Republic Slovenia, Ljubljana
T2  - Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo
T1  - Public Risk Perspectives Regarding the Threat of Terrorism in Belgrade: Implications for Risk Management Decision-Making for Individuals, Communities and Public Authorities
VL  - 69
IS  - 4
SP  - 279
EP  - 298
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_831
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Cvetković, Vladimir and Noji, Eric and Filipović, Marina and Popović Mančević, Marija and Kešetović, Želimir and Radović, Nenad",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to assess the risk of terrorist attacks as perceived by individuals, the local community as a whole, and municipal public safety officials in Belgrade, the capital of the Republic of Serbia. The structured questionnaire about perceived risk of terrorist attacks and preparedness was developed using close-ended, multiple choice questions and questionnaire items featuring 5-point Likert response options. Data were collected between June and September 2017 by a telephone survey using a random digit dialing procedure; 485 adult Serbian residents participated in the research voluntarily. Study participants exhibited low levels of perception vis-a-vis the future likelihood of terrorist attacks occurring in their communities, and only a moderate knowledge of counter-terrorism activities currently being undertaken by public safety authorities. Other responses to our questionnaire indicated statistically significant differences in perception of the risks of terrorism threats in Belgrade with respect to demographic variables such as age, gender, employment and past exposure to major emergencies. We encourage emergency management agencies in Serbia to use the differences in public perception of risks identified in our study to develop enhanced counter-terrorism preparedness measures through the promotion of behavioural change. Such action goes hand-in-hand with the adoption of improved risk management decision-making procedures. Furthermore, to improve risk management decision-making we need to anticipate virtually all possible scenarios because terrorism is now a clear and present danger to the safety of the citizens of Serbia. All cities and towns in Serbia need to have up-to-date disaster plans that are tailored to specific scenarios and locations as opposed to only preconceived generalized plans.",
publisher = "Ministry Interior Republic Slovenia, Ljubljana",
journal = "Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo",
title = "Public Risk Perspectives Regarding the Threat of Terrorism in Belgrade: Implications for Risk Management Decision-Making for Individuals, Communities and Public Authorities",
volume = "69",
number = "4",
pages = "279-298",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_831"
}

Cvetković, V., Noji, E., Filipović, M., Popović Mančević, M., Kešetović, Ž.,& Radović, N.. (2018). Public Risk Perspectives Regarding the Threat of Terrorism in Belgrade: Implications for Risk Management Decision-Making for Individuals, Communities and Public Authorities. in Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo
Ministry Interior Republic Slovenia, Ljubljana., 69(4), 279-298.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_831

Cvetković V, Noji E, Filipović M, Popović Mančević M, Kešetović Ž, Radović N. Public Risk Perspectives Regarding the Threat of Terrorism in Belgrade: Implications for Risk Management Decision-Making for Individuals, Communities and Public Authorities. in Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo. 2018;69(4):279-298.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_831 .

Cvetković, Vladimir, Noji, Eric, Filipović, Marina, Popović Mančević, Marija, Kešetović, Želimir, Radović, Nenad, "Public Risk Perspectives Regarding the Threat of Terrorism in Belgrade: Implications for Risk Management Decision-Making for Individuals, Communities and Public Authorities" in Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 69, no. 4 (2018):279-298,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_831 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Mijalković, Saša
AU  - Popović Mančević, Marija
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/917
AB  - The monograph Contemporary Security Studies: An Introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security is the result of many years of comprehensive research of the phenomenon of security and the endangering of security and it is the outcome of the research effort aimed to prove the scientific character of the security field. 
The fact is that security in the Republic of Serbia is still not in the national nomenclature of scientific fields. Instead, it is claimed, with some reason, but far from having absolute right to it, by political scientists, jurists, soldiers, ecologists, and similar scientific and educational, and professional profiles. In spite of everything, the theory and practice of security have developed to the point of growing into an independent scientific field within the social and humanity sciences, and to a great extent within the natural and technical and technological sciences. Therefore, we expect security to be declared an independent scientific field within the social and humanity sciences, and this monograph to be one of the numerous and firm arguments in accomplishing that aim.
Respecting the postulates of the methodology of scientific research, professional ethics in higher education and scientific and research activities, but also the standards of the Code of Ethics of Scientific and Research Work of the Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, it is our duty to briefly elaborate the history of this book. Specifically, the ideas for the texts on security, endangering of security, and the methodology of exploring security phenomena, have been taken from the traditional Belgrade Security School that has been developed for years in the Education and Research Centre of the Security Institute, the former (Service, Department of) State Security, in the Security Information Agency, at the Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade (former Faculty of Civil Defence, before that, Faculty of National Defence), and in police education (the Secondary School of Interior Affairs in Sremska Kamenica, the College of Interior Affairs in Zemun, Police Academy in Belgrade, and the Academy of Criminalistics and Police Studies in Zemun).
The presented scientific findings obtained scientific verification, to a smaller extent, by being published in the first and second edition of the course book National Security by the author Saša Mijaković PhD (Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, 2009, 2011). It was in the first three chapters of the course book (Methodological basis of national security, Security, and Endangering security), on around 100 pages. The development of scientific thought has led, over time, to the justified need for distancing the matter of the security basis/introduction to contemporary security studies from the matter of national security, and to intensive abstraction of the matter of the security basis in relation to the operationalized matter of the national security. The results of the distinction that refer to the basic categories of security are incorporated in this monograph. 
The scientific findings taken from the course book National Security (2009, 2011) constitute up to 30% of this monograph. Therefore, we strived to accomplish that Contemporary Security Studies: An Introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security meets all normative and ethic criteria of a new scientific publication, which was confirmed by the reviewers. Meanwhile, in the course book National Security (third edition, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2015), these contents were, to a great extent, excluded and replaced by a new text. Finally, we were again honoured to have the publishing and copyrights remain in the hands of the Academy, to which we devoted our careers.
PB  - Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies
T1  - Contemporary security studies : an introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_917
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Mijalković, Saša and Popović Mančević, Marija",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The monograph Contemporary Security Studies: An Introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security is the result of many years of comprehensive research of the phenomenon of security and the endangering of security and it is the outcome of the research effort aimed to prove the scientific character of the security field. 
The fact is that security in the Republic of Serbia is still not in the national nomenclature of scientific fields. Instead, it is claimed, with some reason, but far from having absolute right to it, by political scientists, jurists, soldiers, ecologists, and similar scientific and educational, and professional profiles. In spite of everything, the theory and practice of security have developed to the point of growing into an independent scientific field within the social and humanity sciences, and to a great extent within the natural and technical and technological sciences. Therefore, we expect security to be declared an independent scientific field within the social and humanity sciences, and this monograph to be one of the numerous and firm arguments in accomplishing that aim.
Respecting the postulates of the methodology of scientific research, professional ethics in higher education and scientific and research activities, but also the standards of the Code of Ethics of Scientific and Research Work of the Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, it is our duty to briefly elaborate the history of this book. Specifically, the ideas for the texts on security, endangering of security, and the methodology of exploring security phenomena, have been taken from the traditional Belgrade Security School that has been developed for years in the Education and Research Centre of the Security Institute, the former (Service, Department of) State Security, in the Security Information Agency, at the Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade (former Faculty of Civil Defence, before that, Faculty of National Defence), and in police education (the Secondary School of Interior Affairs in Sremska Kamenica, the College of Interior Affairs in Zemun, Police Academy in Belgrade, and the Academy of Criminalistics and Police Studies in Zemun).
The presented scientific findings obtained scientific verification, to a smaller extent, by being published in the first and second edition of the course book National Security by the author Saša Mijaković PhD (Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, 2009, 2011). It was in the first three chapters of the course book (Methodological basis of national security, Security, and Endangering security), on around 100 pages. The development of scientific thought has led, over time, to the justified need for distancing the matter of the security basis/introduction to contemporary security studies from the matter of national security, and to intensive abstraction of the matter of the security basis in relation to the operationalized matter of the national security. The results of the distinction that refer to the basic categories of security are incorporated in this monograph. 
The scientific findings taken from the course book National Security (2009, 2011) constitute up to 30% of this monograph. Therefore, we strived to accomplish that Contemporary Security Studies: An Introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security meets all normative and ethic criteria of a new scientific publication, which was confirmed by the reviewers. Meanwhile, in the course book National Security (third edition, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2015), these contents were, to a great extent, excluded and replaced by a new text. Finally, we were again honoured to have the publishing and copyrights remain in the hands of the Academy, to which we devoted our careers.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies",
title = "Contemporary security studies : an introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_917"
}

Mijalković, S.,& Popović Mančević, M.. (2018). Contemporary security studies : an introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security. 
Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_917

Mijalković S, Popović Mančević M. Contemporary security studies : an introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_917 .

Mijalković, Saša, Popović Mančević, Marija, "Contemporary security studies : an introduction to methodological, research and theoretical foundations of security" (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_917 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović Mančević, Marija
AU  - Ružić, Maja
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/794
AB  - Contemporary security studies have opened the field for a multitude of new terms and concepts. Professional language enrichment of contemporary security studies has been a logical consequence of the expansion of their research fields, which occurs in response to emerging security threats and challenges, as well as to new subjects and objects of security studies and practices. The newly established post-Cold War era in security studies has been featured by calling in question the dominant state-centric understanding of the concept of security, which brings about the deepening of the concept to the individual level of analysis. In addition to the well-established terms as state security and national security, in contemporary security studies discourse there has been emerging terms that refer to the security dynamics that takes place on an individual level such as individual security, personal security and human security. However, in the academics’ writings these terms and concepts are often vaguely defined, and used in academics’ and public discourse in different ways, sometimes as synonyms, while in some cases the same terms are used with different meanings, which inevitably leads to a certain terminological imprecision. Variations in definition of terms and guidelines such as human security, individual security and personal security in domestic and foreign scholars’ papers point to the lack of universality and their fluid nature. These variations are partly considered to be the consequence of the complexity of these new concepts, but they also may be caused by too much latitude in interpretation of their meaning. This deprives these concepts of the stable and common meaning and poses an obstacle for their use in common academic discourse. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to find some standards in the use of these concepts and to link them with the dominant and prevailing meanings that are attached to them in academic use. In order to give an answer to the question of whether are they different concepts or the multiplication of the same concept, the meanings of the term individual security will firstly be presented when considered as a level of analysis in security studies, and then when it is considered as part of a broader political concept of human security.
AB  - Savremene studije bezbednosti otvorile su polje za mnoštvo novih termina i koncepata. Obogaćivanje jezika savremenih studija bezbednosti logična je posledica širenja njihovog istraživačkog polja, koje nastaje kao odgovor akademske zajednice na novonastale bezbednosne izazove i pretnje, kao i nove subjekte i objekte studija i prakse bezbednosti. Posthladnoratovski period u studijama bezbednosti obeležen je i preispitivanjem dominantnog državocentričnog shvatanja pojma bezbednosti koje je rezultiralo produbljivanjem pojma i njegovom širenju ka individualnom nivou analize. Pored termina državna i nacionalna bezbednost, u diskursu savremenih studija bezbednosti javljaju se termini kao što su individualna bezbednost, lična bezbednost, bezbednost pojedinca i ljudska bezbednost. Međutim, u literaturi su ovi termini često nejasno određeni, pa se u akademskom diskursu koriste na različite načine. Nedoslednost u definisanju pojmova kao što su ljudska bezbednost, individualna bezbednost i lična (personalna) bezbednost kod domaćih i stranih autora neminovno ukazuje na njihovu fluidnu prirodu i nedovoljnu preciznost. Ona je posledica složenosti ovih novonastalih pojmova, ali i slobode u interpretaciji njihovih značenja koja sprečava da se sadržaj ovih pojmova učvrsti i postane deo zajedničkog, ustaljenog akademskog diskursa. Stoga, cilj rada je da ukaže na pravilnosti u upotrebi navedenih pojmova i poveže ih sa dominantnim, preovlađujućim značenjem za koje se u akademskoj upotrebi najčešće vezuju. Kako bi se dao odgovor na pitanje da li se radi o različitim pojmovima ili multiplikaciji istog pojma, u radu će se najprije izložiti sama upotreba termina individualna bezbednost, kao nivoa analize u studijama bezbednosti, a potom njegova upotreba kao dela jednog šireg političkog koncepta kakva je ljudska bezbednost.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Individual security in academic discourse
T1  - Individualna bezbednost u akademskom diskursu
VL  - 22
IS  - 1
SP  - 127
EP  - 140
DO  - 10.5937/nabepo22-11652
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Popović Mančević, Marija and Ružić, Maja",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Contemporary security studies have opened the field for a multitude of new terms and concepts. Professional language enrichment of contemporary security studies has been a logical consequence of the expansion of their research fields, which occurs in response to emerging security threats and challenges, as well as to new subjects and objects of security studies and practices. The newly established post-Cold War era in security studies has been featured by calling in question the dominant state-centric understanding of the concept of security, which brings about the deepening of the concept to the individual level of analysis. In addition to the well-established terms as state security and national security, in contemporary security studies discourse there has been emerging terms that refer to the security dynamics that takes place on an individual level such as individual security, personal security and human security. However, in the academics’ writings these terms and concepts are often vaguely defined, and used in academics’ and public discourse in different ways, sometimes as synonyms, while in some cases the same terms are used with different meanings, which inevitably leads to a certain terminological imprecision. Variations in definition of terms and guidelines such as human security, individual security and personal security in domestic and foreign scholars’ papers point to the lack of universality and their fluid nature. These variations are partly considered to be the consequence of the complexity of these new concepts, but they also may be caused by too much latitude in interpretation of their meaning. This deprives these concepts of the stable and common meaning and poses an obstacle for their use in common academic discourse. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to find some standards in the use of these concepts and to link them with the dominant and prevailing meanings that are attached to them in academic use. In order to give an answer to the question of whether are they different concepts or the multiplication of the same concept, the meanings of the term individual security will firstly be presented when considered as a level of analysis in security studies, and then when it is considered as part of a broader political concept of human security., Savremene studije bezbednosti otvorile su polje za mnoštvo novih termina i koncepata. Obogaćivanje jezika savremenih studija bezbednosti logična je posledica širenja njihovog istraživačkog polja, koje nastaje kao odgovor akademske zajednice na novonastale bezbednosne izazove i pretnje, kao i nove subjekte i objekte studija i prakse bezbednosti. Posthladnoratovski period u studijama bezbednosti obeležen je i preispitivanjem dominantnog državocentričnog shvatanja pojma bezbednosti koje je rezultiralo produbljivanjem pojma i njegovom širenju ka individualnom nivou analize. Pored termina državna i nacionalna bezbednost, u diskursu savremenih studija bezbednosti javljaju se termini kao što su individualna bezbednost, lična bezbednost, bezbednost pojedinca i ljudska bezbednost. Međutim, u literaturi su ovi termini često nejasno određeni, pa se u akademskom diskursu koriste na različite načine. Nedoslednost u definisanju pojmova kao što su ljudska bezbednost, individualna bezbednost i lična (personalna) bezbednost kod domaćih i stranih autora neminovno ukazuje na njihovu fluidnu prirodu i nedovoljnu preciznost. Ona je posledica složenosti ovih novonastalih pojmova, ali i slobode u interpretaciji njihovih značenja koja sprečava da se sadržaj ovih pojmova učvrsti i postane deo zajedničkog, ustaljenog akademskog diskursa. Stoga, cilj rada je da ukaže na pravilnosti u upotrebi navedenih pojmova i poveže ih sa dominantnim, preovlađujućim značenjem za koje se u akademskoj upotrebi najčešće vezuju. Kako bi se dao odgovor na pitanje da li se radi o različitim pojmovima ili multiplikaciji istog pojma, u radu će se najprije izložiti sama upotreba termina individualna bezbednost, kao nivoa analize u studijama bezbednosti, a potom njegova upotreba kao dela jednog šireg političkog koncepta kakva je ljudska bezbednost.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Individual security in academic discourse, Individualna bezbednost u akademskom diskursu",
volume = "22",
number = "1",
pages = "127-140",
doi = "10.5937/nabepo22-11652"
}

Popović Mančević, M.,& Ružić, M.. (2017). Individual security in academic discourse. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 22(1), 127-140.
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo22-11652

Popović Mančević M, Ružić M. Individual security in academic discourse. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2017;22(1):127-140.
doi:10.5937/nabepo22-11652 .

Popović Mančević, Marija, Ružić, Maja, "Individual security in academic discourse" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 22, no. 1 (2017):127-140,
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo22-11652 . .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Мијалковић, Саша
AU  - Поповић, Марија
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1171
PB  - Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија
T1  - Увод у студије безбедности : методолошко-истраживачке и теоријске основе безбедности
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1171
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Мијалковић, Саша and Поповић, Марија",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија",
title = "Увод у студије безбедности : методолошко-истраживачке и теоријске основе безбедности",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1171"
}

Мијалковић, С.,& Поповић, М.. (2016). Увод у студије безбедности : методолошко-истраживачке и теоријске основе безбедности. 
Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1171

Мијалковић С, Поповић М. Увод у студије безбедности : методолошко-истраживачке и теоријске основе безбедности. 2016;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1171 .

Мијалковић, Саша, Поповић, Марија, "Увод у студије безбедности : методолошко-истраживачке и теоријске основе безбедности" (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1171 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cvetković, Vladimir
AU  - Popović Mančević, Marija
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/417
AB  - Undeniable destructiveness of weapons of mass destruction and their proliferation development, on the one hand, and the expansion of extremism and terrorism in the world, on the other hand, indicate an increasing risk of their misuse for terrorist purposes. Besides, difficulties of detection and identification of those hazardous materials, which further make it more complex for defense and rescue forces to react at the site of a terrorist attack, additionally motivate the leaders of terrorist groups to acquire these weapons. Subsequently, this paper made a retrospective of the( in)direct connection between these weapons and terrorist groups, giving a general overview of weapons of mass destruction that could be used for terrorist purposes, and examining the certainty and possibility of their misuse to achieve terrorists' goals.
AB  - Nesporna destruktivnost oružja za masovno uništavanje i razvoj njegove proliferacije s jedne, kao i ekspanzija ekstremizma i terorizma u svetu, s druge strane, ukazuju na povećan rizik od moguće upotrebe navedenog oružja u terorističke svrhe. Uz to, otežana detekcija i identifikacija pomenutih opasnih materija, koja dodatno usložnjava postupanje snaga zaštite i spasavanja na mestu terorističkog događaja, još više inspiriše lidere terorističkih grupa da se domognu ovog oružja. S tim u vezi, u radu je učinjen osvrt na (ne)posrednu vezu između ovog oružja i terorističkih grupa, daje se generalni pregled oružja za masovno uništavanje koja se mogu iskoristiti u terorističke svrhe i ispituje se realnost i mogućnost njegove upotrebe radi ostvarenja terorističkih ciljeva.
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Possibilities of weapon of mass destruction abuse for terrorist purposes
T1  - Mogućnosti zloupotrebe oružja za masovno uništavanje u terorističke svrhe
VL  - 53
IS  - 2
SP  - 149
EP  - 167
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_417
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Cvetković, Vladimir and Popović Mančević, Marija",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Undeniable destructiveness of weapons of mass destruction and their proliferation development, on the one hand, and the expansion of extremism and terrorism in the world, on the other hand, indicate an increasing risk of their misuse for terrorist purposes. Besides, difficulties of detection and identification of those hazardous materials, which further make it more complex for defense and rescue forces to react at the site of a terrorist attack, additionally motivate the leaders of terrorist groups to acquire these weapons. Subsequently, this paper made a retrospective of the( in)direct connection between these weapons and terrorist groups, giving a general overview of weapons of mass destruction that could be used for terrorist purposes, and examining the certainty and possibility of their misuse to achieve terrorists' goals., Nesporna destruktivnost oružja za masovno uništavanje i razvoj njegove proliferacije s jedne, kao i ekspanzija ekstremizma i terorizma u svetu, s druge strane, ukazuju na povećan rizik od moguće upotrebe navedenog oružja u terorističke svrhe. Uz to, otežana detekcija i identifikacija pomenutih opasnih materija, koja dodatno usložnjava postupanje snaga zaštite i spasavanja na mestu terorističkog događaja, još više inspiriše lidere terorističkih grupa da se domognu ovog oružja. S tim u vezi, u radu je učinjen osvrt na (ne)posrednu vezu između ovog oružja i terorističkih grupa, daje se generalni pregled oružja za masovno uništavanje koja se mogu iskoristiti u terorističke svrhe i ispituje se realnost i mogućnost njegove upotrebe radi ostvarenja terorističkih ciljeva.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Possibilities of weapon of mass destruction abuse for terrorist purposes, Mogućnosti zloupotrebe oružja za masovno uništavanje u terorističke svrhe",
volume = "53",
number = "2",
pages = "149-167",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_417"
}

Cvetković, V.,& Popović Mančević, M.. (2011). Possibilities of weapon of mass destruction abuse for terrorist purposes. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 53(2), 149-167.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_417

Cvetković V, Popović Mančević M. Possibilities of weapon of mass destruction abuse for terrorist purposes. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2011;53(2):149-167.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_417 .

Cvetković, Vladimir, Popović Mančević, Marija, "Possibilities of weapon of mass destruction abuse for terrorist purposes" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 53, no. 2 (2011):149-167,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_417 .