Radojičić, Miroslav

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
1dd9cccb-50f0-41c7-b571-98040e13869e
  • Radojičić, Miroslav (2)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

An analysis of the 1831 regulations on the work of Belgrade police

Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana; Radojičić, Miroslav

(Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana
AU  - Radojičić, Miroslav
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/637
AB  - After the Second Serbian Uprising in Serbia, a mixed Serbian-Turkish Administration was established, based on the agreement of Prince Milos and Marasli-Ali Pasha in 1815. Essentially, this meant that the Turkish authorities had jurisdiction over the Turks, while the newly established national authorities had jurisdiction over the Serbs. The so-called Kadi and Muselim had the power of a judge for the Turks, while the Duke was the chief of police - as a separate authority. The headquarters of the Turkish police commanding officers were in the administrative units called Nahiyah (or Nahia), and there was one Duke in Belgrade and one in Grocka. Even though the Dukes were formally subordinated and exclusively responded to the Vizier in Belgrade for their work, in practice they paid much more attention to the opinion of the Serbian Prince, who they were financially dependent on. The National Princes had the power of a judge for the Serbs, and simultaneously were in charge of policing. They usually arbitrated 'in the field', and carried out the sentences themselves with the assistance of armed young men. In Belgrade, these jobs were mainly performed by the Princes of the National Office (the Court). Due to the constant presence of the Turks in Belgrade and their sensitivity to any independent decisions made by the Serbian authorities, the conditions of their work were much more complex than those in somewhere up country. This is the reason why the Princes of the National Office did not dare to bring verdicts and carry out sentences themselves, so in each spe­cific case they would first ask for the instructions of Prince Milos. Realizing that one Bulibasha with about 15 policemen (which formed the Belgrade police at the time) objectively was not able to serve the National office, guard the Palace in Topcider and maintain order in the Serbian part of Belgrade, Prince Milos decided to introduce changes - a decision which resulted from his incredible pre­sentiment of the events that Serbia was yet to face. In 1826 Prince Milos turned the National office into the Belgrade court (so-called Magistrate) and appointed its employees himself. In mid-1828 Prince Petar Lazarevic was appointed by the Prince Milos to be the first Director of the Belgrade police, which was part of the court at the time. Three years later, a regulation on Belgrade policing was brought by the prince, which tasked the police forces with the following: to maintain the peace, order and cleanliness of the town, to make proposals to the Magistrate and be at hand for its every need, to monitor the local people and the foreigners, to control and verify passports, and to carry out sentences upon the offenders ordered by the Magistrate. This regulation for the first time clearly separated the executive and the judicial power: the Director of the police had no authority to sentence the offenders - instead he delivered them before the court and waited for the verdict; while the right for punishment was limited to 25 blows with a stick (more serious penalty could only be imposed by the Magistrate). The director of police was at the same time a full member of the Magistrate with the voting right during pronouncing sentences. However, he was directly subordinated only to the Prince.
AB  - Nakon Drugog srpskog ustanka u Srbiji je uspostavljena mešovita, srpsko-turska uprava, zasnovana na usmenom sporazumu kneza Miloša i Marašli-Ali paše iz 1815. godine. U osnovi, to je značilo da nadležnost nad Turcima imaju turski organi vlasti, dok su za Srbe bili nadležni novoformirani domaći organi. Turcima su sudili kadija i muselim, a na čelu policije kao posebne ustanove bio je vojvoda. Sedište turskih policijskih starešina bilo je u nahijskim centrima, a po jedan vojvoda obitavao je u Beogradu i Grockoj. Iako su formalno bile neposredno potčinjene veziru u Beogradu i za svoj rad odgovarale isključivo njemu, vojvode su u praksi mnogo više vodile računa o mišljenju srpskog kneza od koga su finansijski zavisile. Srbima su sudili narodni knezovi, nahijski i knežinski, koji su istovremeno obavljali i policijske dužnosti. Oni su po unutrašnjosti sudili 'na terenu' i svoje presude uz pomoć naoružanih momaka sami i izvršavali. U tom pogledu izdvajao ce Beograd, y kome su maj posao uglavnom obavljali knezovi Narodne kancelarije (suda). Imajući u vidu stalno prisustvo Turaka u Beogradu i njihovu osetljivost na svako samostalno rešenje srpskih organa, uslovi njihovog rada bili su mnogo složeniji od onih u unutrašnjosti. Upravo zato knezovi Narodne kancelarije i nisu smeli sami presuđivati i kažnjavati, već su u svakom konkretnom slučaju najpre tražili uputstva za rad od kneza Miloša. Sa neverovatnom osobinom tačnog predosećanja događaja kojima je Srbija išla u susret, a i uviđajući da jedan buljubaša sa petnaestak pandura koji su činili beogradsku policiju objektivno ne može da opslužuje Narodnu kancelariju, čuva konak u Topčideru i pazi i održava red u srpskom delu beogradske varoši, knez Miloš se rešio na promene. Narodna kancelarija je 1826. pretvorena u Beogradski sud (magistrat), čiji je personal odredio knez Miloš. Polovinom 1828. Miloš je postavio kneza Petra Lazarevića za prvog 'direktora' beogradske policije, koju je istovremeno uključio u sastav suda. Tri godine kasnije beogradska policija je od kneza dobila 'propis' o radu, kojim joj je u zadatak stavljeno: da motri na mir, red i čistoću u varoši, da čini predloge Magistratu i bude mu pri ruci za svaku potrebu, da nadgleda domaće ljude i strance, da pregleda i overava pasoše i da izvršava kazne nad prestupnicima koje Magistrat izrekne. Ovim propisom prvi put su jasnije razdvojene izvršna i sudska vlast: direktor policije nije imao pravo kažnjavanja krivaca, već ih je predavao sudu i očekivao njegovu presudu, a i pravo kažnjavanja podređenih mu je ograničeno na 25 udaraca štapom (kazne veće od ove mogao je izreći Magistrat). Direktor policije je istovremeno bio punopravni član Magistrata sa pravom glasa pri izricanju presuda. Ipak, neposredno je bio podređen samo knezu.
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - An analysis of the 1831 regulations on the work of Belgrade police
T1  - Analiza propisa o radu beogradske policije iz 1831. godine
VL  - 57
IS  - 1
SP  - 105
EP  - 120
DO  - 10.5937/bezbednost1501105K
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana and Radojičić, Miroslav",
year = "2015",
abstract = "After the Second Serbian Uprising in Serbia, a mixed Serbian-Turkish Administration was established, based on the agreement of Prince Milos and Marasli-Ali Pasha in 1815. Essentially, this meant that the Turkish authorities had jurisdiction over the Turks, while the newly established national authorities had jurisdiction over the Serbs. The so-called Kadi and Muselim had the power of a judge for the Turks, while the Duke was the chief of police - as a separate authority. The headquarters of the Turkish police commanding officers were in the administrative units called Nahiyah (or Nahia), and there was one Duke in Belgrade and one in Grocka. Even though the Dukes were formally subordinated and exclusively responded to the Vizier in Belgrade for their work, in practice they paid much more attention to the opinion of the Serbian Prince, who they were financially dependent on. The National Princes had the power of a judge for the Serbs, and simultaneously were in charge of policing. They usually arbitrated 'in the field', and carried out the sentences themselves with the assistance of armed young men. In Belgrade, these jobs were mainly performed by the Princes of the National Office (the Court). Due to the constant presence of the Turks in Belgrade and their sensitivity to any independent decisions made by the Serbian authorities, the conditions of their work were much more complex than those in somewhere up country. This is the reason why the Princes of the National Office did not dare to bring verdicts and carry out sentences themselves, so in each spe­cific case they would first ask for the instructions of Prince Milos. Realizing that one Bulibasha with about 15 policemen (which formed the Belgrade police at the time) objectively was not able to serve the National office, guard the Palace in Topcider and maintain order in the Serbian part of Belgrade, Prince Milos decided to introduce changes - a decision which resulted from his incredible pre­sentiment of the events that Serbia was yet to face. In 1826 Prince Milos turned the National office into the Belgrade court (so-called Magistrate) and appointed its employees himself. In mid-1828 Prince Petar Lazarevic was appointed by the Prince Milos to be the first Director of the Belgrade police, which was part of the court at the time. Three years later, a regulation on Belgrade policing was brought by the prince, which tasked the police forces with the following: to maintain the peace, order and cleanliness of the town, to make proposals to the Magistrate and be at hand for its every need, to monitor the local people and the foreigners, to control and verify passports, and to carry out sentences upon the offenders ordered by the Magistrate. This regulation for the first time clearly separated the executive and the judicial power: the Director of the police had no authority to sentence the offenders - instead he delivered them before the court and waited for the verdict; while the right for punishment was limited to 25 blows with a stick (more serious penalty could only be imposed by the Magistrate). The director of police was at the same time a full member of the Magistrate with the voting right during pronouncing sentences. However, he was directly subordinated only to the Prince., Nakon Drugog srpskog ustanka u Srbiji je uspostavljena mešovita, srpsko-turska uprava, zasnovana na usmenom sporazumu kneza Miloša i Marašli-Ali paše iz 1815. godine. U osnovi, to je značilo da nadležnost nad Turcima imaju turski organi vlasti, dok su za Srbe bili nadležni novoformirani domaći organi. Turcima su sudili kadija i muselim, a na čelu policije kao posebne ustanove bio je vojvoda. Sedište turskih policijskih starešina bilo je u nahijskim centrima, a po jedan vojvoda obitavao je u Beogradu i Grockoj. Iako su formalno bile neposredno potčinjene veziru u Beogradu i za svoj rad odgovarale isključivo njemu, vojvode su u praksi mnogo više vodile računa o mišljenju srpskog kneza od koga su finansijski zavisile. Srbima su sudili narodni knezovi, nahijski i knežinski, koji su istovremeno obavljali i policijske dužnosti. Oni su po unutrašnjosti sudili 'na terenu' i svoje presude uz pomoć naoružanih momaka sami i izvršavali. U tom pogledu izdvajao ce Beograd, y kome su maj posao uglavnom obavljali knezovi Narodne kancelarije (suda). Imajući u vidu stalno prisustvo Turaka u Beogradu i njihovu osetljivost na svako samostalno rešenje srpskih organa, uslovi njihovog rada bili su mnogo složeniji od onih u unutrašnjosti. Upravo zato knezovi Narodne kancelarije i nisu smeli sami presuđivati i kažnjavati, već su u svakom konkretnom slučaju najpre tražili uputstva za rad od kneza Miloša. Sa neverovatnom osobinom tačnog predosećanja događaja kojima je Srbija išla u susret, a i uviđajući da jedan buljubaša sa petnaestak pandura koji su činili beogradsku policiju objektivno ne može da opslužuje Narodnu kancelariju, čuva konak u Topčideru i pazi i održava red u srpskom delu beogradske varoši, knez Miloš se rešio na promene. Narodna kancelarija je 1826. pretvorena u Beogradski sud (magistrat), čiji je personal odredio knez Miloš. Polovinom 1828. Miloš je postavio kneza Petra Lazarevića za prvog 'direktora' beogradske policije, koju je istovremeno uključio u sastav suda. Tri godine kasnije beogradska policija je od kneza dobila 'propis' o radu, kojim joj je u zadatak stavljeno: da motri na mir, red i čistoću u varoši, da čini predloge Magistratu i bude mu pri ruci za svaku potrebu, da nadgleda domaće ljude i strance, da pregleda i overava pasoše i da izvršava kazne nad prestupnicima koje Magistrat izrekne. Ovim propisom prvi put su jasnije razdvojene izvršna i sudska vlast: direktor policije nije imao pravo kažnjavanja krivaca, već ih je predavao sudu i očekivao njegovu presudu, a i pravo kažnjavanja podređenih mu je ograničeno na 25 udaraca štapom (kazne veće od ove mogao je izreći Magistrat). Direktor policije je istovremeno bio punopravni član Magistrata sa pravom glasa pri izricanju presuda. Ipak, neposredno je bio podređen samo knezu.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "An analysis of the 1831 regulations on the work of Belgrade police, Analiza propisa o radu beogradske policije iz 1831. godine",
volume = "57",
number = "1",
pages = "105-120",
doi = "10.5937/bezbednost1501105K"
}
Krstić-Mistridželović, I.,& Radojičić, M.. (2015). An analysis of the 1831 regulations on the work of Belgrade police. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 57(1), 105-120.
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost1501105K
Krstić-Mistridželović I, Radojičić M. An analysis of the 1831 regulations on the work of Belgrade police. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2015;57(1):105-120.
doi:10.5937/bezbednost1501105K .
Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana, Radojičić, Miroslav, "An analysis of the 1831 regulations on the work of Belgrade police" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 57, no. 1 (2015):105-120,
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost1501105K . .

The Belgrade town police in the period of the establishment of the constitutionalists' government

Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana; Radojičić, Miroslav

(Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana
AU  - Radojičić, Miroslav
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/597
AB  - Prince Mihailo Obrenovic took over the administration of the country in the significantly altered the constitutional situation, created by the adoption of the Constitution of 1838 and the departure of Serbian Prince Milos 1839. Constitution ensured the supremacy of the State Council as an oligarchic body of the prince in the adoption of new legislation expanded and contrary to the constitution. Gradual narrowing and even abolishing competences of prince in the legislative and executive branches Constitutionalists are aimed to ensure the constitutionally established order. One of the measures taken to this aim was the adoption of regulations by which the Belgrade police under the control of Constitutionalist Party. The Belgrade police which in the time of Miloš rule was subordinated directly to the prince, by the Decree of 1840 came under the jurisdiction of the competent ministry. The contents of the this Decree that remained in Serbia in force throughout the nineteenth century shows how wide was the scope of its work. Specifically, the Board took care of law and order, personal safety or property of citizens, conducted surveillance of suspicious persons, travelers, foreigners and idles, worried about traffic safety and the safety of roads, alleys, and cobblestone bridge, followed the proper operation of the innkeepers, butchers and traders worried about neatness squares and product prices, participated in the settlement of disputes between creditors and debtors, secured and numbered the property of deceased persons and fallen into bankruptcy, suppress immorality, watch the correctness water supply, public fountains and street lighting, directing the development of settlements, undertook measures to protect against fire, suppressing the fights, riots and rebellions, took care of the health of citizens and public hygiene, issued an order on line and order in the town, enforce court decisions, took care of the prisoners, carried a list of public and private property at the request of his superiors authorities , state revenues collected from the population, participated in the division of the borough plots for raising houses in the area of Batal mosque, in Sava-waving, Palilula, Terazije, past ponds Venice, and finally led to a variety of correspondence - submitted reports to the competent organs of the state administration and consisted of a number of proposals from the circle of their activity. On the other hand, the Decree on the duties of the administration of the City of Belgrade in 1840 must be seen as part of a comprehensive legislative activities Constitutionalist aimed at establishing a highly branched and durable state organization. As part of the whole legal regulations governing the then ruling political elites govern executive, Regulation confirms the conclusion that the Constitutionalist have achieved a lot in terms of formal legislate lofty police power over the people, but failed to sufficiently develop the system control apparatus of executive power. In addition to subjective, there are objective factors that limited Constitutionalist efforts in this direction. Ideas of modern civil state objectively could not be quickly accepted in the still traditional-patriarchal Serbian society.
AB  - U radu se analizira sadržina propisa o radu beogradske policije iz 1840. godine u okviru društvenih i političkih prilika u Kneževini Srbiji na početku ustavobraniteljske vladavine. Knez Mihailo Obrenović preuzeo je upravu zemljom u bitno izmenjenoj ustavnoj situaciji, stvorenoj donošenjem Ustava 1838. i odlaskom iz Srbije kneza Miloša 1839. godine. Ustavom obezbeđena prevlast Državnog saveta kao oligarhijskog tela nad knezom u praksi je određenim uredbama proširena i protivno ustavu. Pokušaj kneza u takvoj situaciji da odbrani svoja ustavna ovlašćenja u zakonodavnoj i izvršnoj vlasti i uspostavi ravnotežu u odnosima sa Savetom nije uspeo. O tome svedoči i donošenje propisa kojim beogradska policija, u Miloševo vreme podređena neposredno knezu, dolazi pod nadležnost resornog ministarstva. S druge strane, Uredba o dužnostima uprave varoši Beograda iz 1840. deo je široke zakonodavne aktivnosti ustavobranitelja usmerene na uspostavljanje razgranatije i trajnije državne organizacije. Primenom istorijskog i sociološkog metoda, kao i metoda analize i sinteze, indukcije i dedukcije, autori objašnjavaju motivaciju za izdavanje ovog propisa čija je sadržina bila presudno determinisana interesima tadašnje političke elite u Srbiji.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - The Belgrade town police in the period of the establishment of the constitutionalists' government
T1  - Beogradska varoška policija u doba uspostavljanja vlasti ustavobranitelja
IS  - 3
SP  - 93
EP  - 107
DO  - 10.5937/NBP1403093M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana and Radojičić, Miroslav",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Prince Mihailo Obrenovic took over the administration of the country in the significantly altered the constitutional situation, created by the adoption of the Constitution of 1838 and the departure of Serbian Prince Milos 1839. Constitution ensured the supremacy of the State Council as an oligarchic body of the prince in the adoption of new legislation expanded and contrary to the constitution. Gradual narrowing and even abolishing competences of prince in the legislative and executive branches Constitutionalists are aimed to ensure the constitutionally established order. One of the measures taken to this aim was the adoption of regulations by which the Belgrade police under the control of Constitutionalist Party. The Belgrade police which in the time of Miloš rule was subordinated directly to the prince, by the Decree of 1840 came under the jurisdiction of the competent ministry. The contents of the this Decree that remained in Serbia in force throughout the nineteenth century shows how wide was the scope of its work. Specifically, the Board took care of law and order, personal safety or property of citizens, conducted surveillance of suspicious persons, travelers, foreigners and idles, worried about traffic safety and the safety of roads, alleys, and cobblestone bridge, followed the proper operation of the innkeepers, butchers and traders worried about neatness squares and product prices, participated in the settlement of disputes between creditors and debtors, secured and numbered the property of deceased persons and fallen into bankruptcy, suppress immorality, watch the correctness water supply, public fountains and street lighting, directing the development of settlements, undertook measures to protect against fire, suppressing the fights, riots and rebellions, took care of the health of citizens and public hygiene, issued an order on line and order in the town, enforce court decisions, took care of the prisoners, carried a list of public and private property at the request of his superiors authorities , state revenues collected from the population, participated in the division of the borough plots for raising houses in the area of Batal mosque, in Sava-waving, Palilula, Terazije, past ponds Venice, and finally led to a variety of correspondence - submitted reports to the competent organs of the state administration and consisted of a number of proposals from the circle of their activity. On the other hand, the Decree on the duties of the administration of the City of Belgrade in 1840 must be seen as part of a comprehensive legislative activities Constitutionalist aimed at establishing a highly branched and durable state organization. As part of the whole legal regulations governing the then ruling political elites govern executive, Regulation confirms the conclusion that the Constitutionalist have achieved a lot in terms of formal legislate lofty police power over the people, but failed to sufficiently develop the system control apparatus of executive power. In addition to subjective, there are objective factors that limited Constitutionalist efforts in this direction. Ideas of modern civil state objectively could not be quickly accepted in the still traditional-patriarchal Serbian society., U radu se analizira sadržina propisa o radu beogradske policije iz 1840. godine u okviru društvenih i političkih prilika u Kneževini Srbiji na početku ustavobraniteljske vladavine. Knez Mihailo Obrenović preuzeo je upravu zemljom u bitno izmenjenoj ustavnoj situaciji, stvorenoj donošenjem Ustava 1838. i odlaskom iz Srbije kneza Miloša 1839. godine. Ustavom obezbeđena prevlast Državnog saveta kao oligarhijskog tela nad knezom u praksi je određenim uredbama proširena i protivno ustavu. Pokušaj kneza u takvoj situaciji da odbrani svoja ustavna ovlašćenja u zakonodavnoj i izvršnoj vlasti i uspostavi ravnotežu u odnosima sa Savetom nije uspeo. O tome svedoči i donošenje propisa kojim beogradska policija, u Miloševo vreme podređena neposredno knezu, dolazi pod nadležnost resornog ministarstva. S druge strane, Uredba o dužnostima uprave varoši Beograda iz 1840. deo je široke zakonodavne aktivnosti ustavobranitelja usmerene na uspostavljanje razgranatije i trajnije državne organizacije. Primenom istorijskog i sociološkog metoda, kao i metoda analize i sinteze, indukcije i dedukcije, autori objašnjavaju motivaciju za izdavanje ovog propisa čija je sadržina bila presudno determinisana interesima tadašnje političke elite u Srbiji.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "The Belgrade town police in the period of the establishment of the constitutionalists' government, Beogradska varoška policija u doba uspostavljanja vlasti ustavobranitelja",
number = "3",
pages = "93-107",
doi = "10.5937/NBP1403093M"
}
Krstić-Mistridželović, I.,& Radojičić, M.. (2014). The Belgrade town police in the period of the establishment of the constitutionalists' government. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd.(3), 93-107.
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1403093M
Krstić-Mistridželović I, Radojičić M. The Belgrade town police in the period of the establishment of the constitutionalists' government. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2014;(3):93-107.
doi:10.5937/NBP1403093M .
Krstić-Mistridželović, Ivana, Radojičić, Miroslav, "The Belgrade town police in the period of the establishment of the constitutionalists' government" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, no. 3 (2014):93-107,
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1403093M . .