TY  - JOUR
AU  - Рисимовић, Радосав
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1427
AB  - Значај кривичног дела пореске утаје није потре -
бно посебно образлагати, јер произлази из значаја јавних прихода
за функционисање модерног друштва. Остварење овог кривичног
дела условљено је постојањем одређене намере учиниоца. Реч је о
субјективном обележју бића пореске утаје коме у теорији кривичног права није посвећена заслужена пажња. За намеру учиниоца се у
смислу овог кривичног дела везују бројне недоумице, чијем решавању
ћемо покушати да допринесемо. Спорно је како у појединим кривичним стварима утврдити постојање намере учиниоца да избегне
плаћање пореза. У раду ћемо анализирати судску праксу, ставове
доктрине и указати на могућа решења ових проблема.
AB  - The importance of the offense of tax evasion does not need to
be elaborated on, because it arises from the importance of public revenues
for the functioning of modern society. The commission of this offense is
conditioned by the existence of wilfulness of the perpetrator. It is a subjective element that has not received the attention it deserves in the theory
and practice of criminal law. The wilfulness of the perpetrator in terms
of this offense is linked to numerous doubts, the resolution of which we
have tried to contribute. The key question is: why is wilfulness a subjective element of the offense of tax evasion? The vagueness of this term, the
similarity with intention and the difficulties in proving it can lead to the
conclusion that the wilfulness only unnecessarily burdens the regulation
on tax evasion, the courts and the theory of criminal law. Nevertheless, it
is justified to prescribe the wilfulness to avoid paying taxes as a subjective
element of this act, because despite the similarities with the intent, there
are also certain differences, which are explained in detail in the paper. It
is most important to emphasize that not every intentional act of tax evasion performed is undertaken with the wilfulness of avoiding paying taxes.
Difficulties in proving it undoubtedly exist, because wilfulness is connected
with the state of consciousness of the perpetrator. However, objective circumstantial evidence can prove the wilfulness of the perpetrator. As a rule,
the circumstantial evidence mentioned in the paper alone is not sufficient
to conclude that there is wilfulness, but in the context of other evidence,
they can contribute to the courts establishing its existence. It is unclear why
our courts in most judgments do not explain the existence of the wilfulness
or do so in an inadequate way.
PB  - Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије
T2  - Безбедност, Београд 
T1  - Намера као субјективни елемент кривичног дела пореске утаје
T1  - Wilfulness as subjective element of the offense of tax evasion
VL  - 64
IS  - 3
SP  - 65
EP  - 83
DO  - 10.5937/bezbednost2203065R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Рисимовић, Радосав",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Значај кривичног дела пореске утаје није потре -
бно посебно образлагати, јер произлази из значаја јавних прихода
за функционисање модерног друштва. Остварење овог кривичног
дела условљено је постојањем одређене намере учиниоца. Реч је о
субјективном обележју бића пореске утаје коме у теорији кривичног права није посвећена заслужена пажња. За намеру учиниоца се у
смислу овог кривичног дела везују бројне недоумице, чијем решавању
ћемо покушати да допринесемо. Спорно је како у појединим кривичним стварима утврдити постојање намере учиниоца да избегне
плаћање пореза. У раду ћемо анализирати судску праксу, ставове
доктрине и указати на могућа решења ових проблема., The importance of the offense of tax evasion does not need to
be elaborated on, because it arises from the importance of public revenues
for the functioning of modern society. The commission of this offense is
conditioned by the existence of wilfulness of the perpetrator. It is a subjective element that has not received the attention it deserves in the theory
and practice of criminal law. The wilfulness of the perpetrator in terms
of this offense is linked to numerous doubts, the resolution of which we
have tried to contribute. The key question is: why is wilfulness a subjective element of the offense of tax evasion? The vagueness of this term, the
similarity with intention and the difficulties in proving it can lead to the
conclusion that the wilfulness only unnecessarily burdens the regulation
on tax evasion, the courts and the theory of criminal law. Nevertheless, it
is justified to prescribe the wilfulness to avoid paying taxes as a subjective
element of this act, because despite the similarities with the intent, there
are also certain differences, which are explained in detail in the paper. It
is most important to emphasize that not every intentional act of tax evasion performed is undertaken with the wilfulness of avoiding paying taxes.
Difficulties in proving it undoubtedly exist, because wilfulness is connected
with the state of consciousness of the perpetrator. However, objective circumstantial evidence can prove the wilfulness of the perpetrator. As a rule,
the circumstantial evidence mentioned in the paper alone is not sufficient
to conclude that there is wilfulness, but in the context of other evidence,
they can contribute to the courts establishing its existence. It is unclear why
our courts in most judgments do not explain the existence of the wilfulness
or do so in an inadequate way.",
publisher = "Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије",
journal = "Безбедност, Београд ",
title = "Намера као субјективни елемент кривичног дела пореске утаје, Wilfulness as subjective element of the offense of tax evasion",
volume = "64",
number = "3",
pages = "65-83",
doi = "10.5937/bezbednost2203065R"
}

Рисимовић, Р.. (2022). Намера као субјективни елемент кривичног дела пореске утаје. in Безбедност, Београд 
Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије., 64(3), 65-83.
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2203065R

Рисимовић Р. Намера као субјективни елемент кривичног дела пореске утаје. in Безбедност, Београд . 2022;64(3):65-83.
doi:10.5937/bezbednost2203065R .

Рисимовић, Радосав, "Намера као субјективни елемент кривичног дела пореске утаје" in Безбедност, Београд , 64, no. 3 (2022):65-83,
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2203065R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Рисимовић, Радосав С.
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1233
AB  - Нове психоактивне супстанце више од десет година привлаче пажњу истраживача. Њихова појава и све већа заступљеност на тржишту дрога захтевају адекватну реакцију свих надлежних државних органа. Посебан проблем је правно регулисање нових дрога, које ће у раду бити детаљно образложено. У уводном излагању ћемо разматрати појам НПС, ризике за здравље и разлоге популарности НПС код корисника дрога. Део рада се односи на алтернативне начине регулисања НПС. Посебна пажња ће бити посвећена генеричким забранама НПС. Покушаћемо да одговоримо на питање које су предности и недостаци генеричког концепта забране нових дрога.
AB  - New psychoactive substances attract attention of the researchers for more than ten years. Their appearance and increasing presence in the drug market require an adequate response from all responsible state authorities. Special problem is the legal regulation of new drugs, which will be explained in detail in the article. In the introduction, we will consider the oncept of NPS, the risks for health and reasons for NPS popularity among drug users. Part of the work refers to alternative ways of regulating NPS. Special attention will be given to generic NPS bans. We will try to answer the question what are the advantages and disadvantages of the generic concept of new drugs ban.
PB  - Нови Сад : Правни факултет
T2  - Зборник радова = Collected papers
T1  - Генеричке забране нових психоактивних супстанци
T1  - Generic Bans of New Psychoactive Substances
VL  - 52
IS  - 4
SP  - 1683
EP  - 1695
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns52-20362
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Рисимовић, Радосав С.",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Нове психоактивне супстанце више од десет година привлаче пажњу истраживача. Њихова појава и све већа заступљеност на тржишту дрога захтевају адекватну реакцију свих надлежних државних органа. Посебан проблем је правно регулисање нових дрога, које ће у раду бити детаљно образложено. У уводном излагању ћемо разматрати појам НПС, ризике за здравље и разлоге популарности НПС код корисника дрога. Део рада се односи на алтернативне начине регулисања НПС. Посебна пажња ће бити посвећена генеричким забранама НПС. Покушаћемо да одговоримо на питање које су предности и недостаци генеричког концепта забране нових дрога., New psychoactive substances attract attention of the researchers for more than ten years. Their appearance and increasing presence in the drug market require an adequate response from all responsible state authorities. Special problem is the legal regulation of new drugs, which will be explained in detail in the article. In the introduction, we will consider the oncept of NPS, the risks for health and reasons for NPS popularity among drug users. Part of the work refers to alternative ways of regulating NPS. Special attention will be given to generic NPS bans. We will try to answer the question what are the advantages and disadvantages of the generic concept of new drugs ban.",
publisher = "Нови Сад : Правни факултет",
journal = "Зборник радова = Collected papers",
title = "Генеричке забране нових психоактивних супстанци, Generic Bans of New Psychoactive Substances",
volume = "52",
number = "4",
pages = "1683-1695",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns52-20362"
}

Рисимовић, Р. С.. (2018). Генеричке забране нових психоактивних супстанци. in Зборник радова = Collected papers
Нови Сад : Правни факултет., 52(4), 1683-1695.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns52-20362

Рисимовић РС. Генеричке забране нових психоактивних супстанци. in Зборник радова = Collected papers. 2018;52(4):1683-1695.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns52-20362 .

Рисимовић, Радосав С., "Генеричке забране нових психоактивних супстанци" in Зборник радова = Collected papers, 52, no. 4 (2018):1683-1695,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns52-20362 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/850
AB  - Cannabis is the most widespread drug in the market in almost all countries across the world. Given that it belongs to the group of so-called soft drugs and, under certain conditions, it is used for medical purposes, the question may arise as to whether it is justified to legalize the use of cannabis. This problem is current, since some countries have already legalized medical, or recreational use of cannabis. Our view that it is justified to legalize the medical use of this plant is expounded in this paper. Contrary to that, we hold that the legalization of commercial sale and recreational use of cannabis is not acceptable. The method of content analysis was used to analyse scientific papers. The method of deduction and induction as well as the synthesis method were also used.
AB  - Kanabis je najrasprostranjenija droga na tržištu u gotovo svim zemljama sveta. S obzirom na to da se ubraja u grupu tzv. lakih droga i da se pod određenim uslovima koristi u medicinske svrhe, postavlja se pitanje da li je opravdano legalizovati upotrebu kanabisa. Pitanje je aktuelno jer su pojedine zemlje već legalizovale medicinsku odnosno rekreativnu upotrebu kanabisa. U radu će biti obrazloženo stanovište autora da je legalizacija medicinske upotrebe ove biljke opravdana. Suprotno tome, a prema mišljenu autora rada, legalizacija komercijalne prodaje i rekreativne upotrebe kanabisa nije prihvatljiva. U analizi literature koja se odnosi na temu rada korišćen je metod analize sadržaja.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Is the legalization of medical and recreational use of cannabis justified?
T1  - Da li je opravdana legalizacija medicinske i rekreativne upotrebe kanabisa?
VL  - 23
IS  - 3
SP  - 251
EP  - 265
DO  - 10.5937/nabepo23-18781
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Cannabis is the most widespread drug in the market in almost all countries across the world. Given that it belongs to the group of so-called soft drugs and, under certain conditions, it is used for medical purposes, the question may arise as to whether it is justified to legalize the use of cannabis. This problem is current, since some countries have already legalized medical, or recreational use of cannabis. Our view that it is justified to legalize the medical use of this plant is expounded in this paper. Contrary to that, we hold that the legalization of commercial sale and recreational use of cannabis is not acceptable. The method of content analysis was used to analyse scientific papers. The method of deduction and induction as well as the synthesis method were also used., Kanabis je najrasprostranjenija droga na tržištu u gotovo svim zemljama sveta. S obzirom na to da se ubraja u grupu tzv. lakih droga i da se pod određenim uslovima koristi u medicinske svrhe, postavlja se pitanje da li je opravdano legalizovati upotrebu kanabisa. Pitanje je aktuelno jer su pojedine zemlje već legalizovale medicinsku odnosno rekreativnu upotrebu kanabisa. U radu će biti obrazloženo stanovište autora da je legalizacija medicinske upotrebe ove biljke opravdana. Suprotno tome, a prema mišljenu autora rada, legalizacija komercijalne prodaje i rekreativne upotrebe kanabisa nije prihvatljiva. U analizi literature koja se odnosi na temu rada korišćen je metod analize sadržaja.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Is the legalization of medical and recreational use of cannabis justified?, Da li je opravdana legalizacija medicinske i rekreativne upotrebe kanabisa?",
volume = "23",
number = "3",
pages = "251-265",
doi = "10.5937/nabepo23-18781"
}

Risimović, R.. (2018). Is the legalization of medical and recreational use of cannabis justified?. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 23(3), 251-265.
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo23-18781

Risimović R. Is the legalization of medical and recreational use of cannabis justified?. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2018;23(3):251-265.
doi:10.5937/nabepo23-18781 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Is the legalization of medical and recreational use of cannabis justified?" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 23, no. 3 (2018):251-265,
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo23-18781 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
AU  - Bošković, Aleksandar
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/817
AB  - As one of the symbols of modern times and globalization, the Internet has greatly contributed to people being very well informed, the exchange of scientific and other data, the development of the economy (especially marketing) and other areas of social life. On the other hand, the Internet is being abused by the perpetrators of the offenses in various ways. Drugs can be advertised, bought, sold on the Internet, information related to the effects of drugs, price, manner of consumption etc. can be obtained through the Internet. In the article, we will consider importance of the Internet for the development of the market of narcotic drugs, or the unlawful circulation of narcotics by the abuse of the Internet. One part of the paper referes to the phenomenon of new psychoactive substances. In addition, we analyzed the capacity of the cryptomarket to influence the conventional drug market.
AB  - Internet je kao jedan od simbola modernog doba i globalizacije u velikoj meri doprineo boljoj informisanosti ljudi, razmeni naučnih i drugih podataka, razvoju privrede (naročito marketinga) i drugih oblasti društvenog života. Sa druge strane, internet se zloupotrebljava od strane učinilaca krivičnih dela na različite načine. Droga se preko interneta može reklamirati, kupiti, prodati, mogu se dobiti informacije koje se odnose na dejstvo droge, cenu, način konzumiranja itd. U radu ćemo razmotriti značaj interneta za razvoj tržišta opojnih droga, odnosno neovlašćeno stavljanje u prometopojnih droga zloupotrebom interneta. Deo rada se odnosi na fenomen novih psihoaktivnih supstanci. Osim toga, analizirali smo kapacitet kriptomarketa da utiču na konvencionalno tržište opojnih droga.
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Unlawful circulation of narcotics through internet abuse
T1  - Neovlašćeno stavljanje u promet opojnih droga zloupotrebom interneta
VL  - 60
IS  - 3
SP  - 26
EP  - 42
DO  - 10.5937/bezbednost1803026R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav and Bošković, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
abstract = "As one of the symbols of modern times and globalization, the Internet has greatly contributed to people being very well informed, the exchange of scientific and other data, the development of the economy (especially marketing) and other areas of social life. On the other hand, the Internet is being abused by the perpetrators of the offenses in various ways. Drugs can be advertised, bought, sold on the Internet, information related to the effects of drugs, price, manner of consumption etc. can be obtained through the Internet. In the article, we will consider importance of the Internet for the development of the market of narcotic drugs, or the unlawful circulation of narcotics by the abuse of the Internet. One part of the paper referes to the phenomenon of new psychoactive substances. In addition, we analyzed the capacity of the cryptomarket to influence the conventional drug market., Internet je kao jedan od simbola modernog doba i globalizacije u velikoj meri doprineo boljoj informisanosti ljudi, razmeni naučnih i drugih podataka, razvoju privrede (naročito marketinga) i drugih oblasti društvenog života. Sa druge strane, internet se zloupotrebljava od strane učinilaca krivičnih dela na različite načine. Droga se preko interneta može reklamirati, kupiti, prodati, mogu se dobiti informacije koje se odnose na dejstvo droge, cenu, način konzumiranja itd. U radu ćemo razmotriti značaj interneta za razvoj tržišta opojnih droga, odnosno neovlašćeno stavljanje u prometopojnih droga zloupotrebom interneta. Deo rada se odnosi na fenomen novih psihoaktivnih supstanci. Osim toga, analizirali smo kapacitet kriptomarketa da utiču na konvencionalno tržište opojnih droga.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Unlawful circulation of narcotics through internet abuse, Neovlašćeno stavljanje u promet opojnih droga zloupotrebom interneta",
volume = "60",
number = "3",
pages = "26-42",
doi = "10.5937/bezbednost1803026R"
}

Risimović, R.,& Bošković, A.. (2018). Unlawful circulation of narcotics through internet abuse. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 60(3), 26-42.
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost1803026R

Risimović R, Bošković A. Unlawful circulation of narcotics through internet abuse. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2018;60(3):26-42.
doi:10.5937/bezbednost1803026R .

Risimović, Radosav, Bošković, Aleksandar, "Unlawful circulation of narcotics through internet abuse" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 60, no. 3 (2018):26-42,
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost1803026R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/804
AB  - The criminal offence of tax evasion is most frequently perpetrated by giving false data on the acquired income and failure to report acquired incomes, as defined in our criminal legislation. A linguistic analysis of the Criminal Code provision which defines this offence can lead to a conclusion that the income subject to taxation can be obtained either lawfully or unlawfully since the legislator does not take a stand regarding this issue. Namely, the 2016 amendments to the Criminal Code deleted the term 'legal' from the legal description of the criminal offence of tax evasion. However, this does not mean that the incomes acquired unlawfully can be subject to taxation, as the paper elaborates in detail. The author explores jurisprudence regarding the imposition of the security measure of the seizure of objects and the measure of seizure material gains in criminal matters related to the criminal offence of illegal production and circulation of narcotic as per Article 246 of the CC. In this way, we shall establish whether these measures are effectively implemented and whether they allow for seizing the incomes obtained from drug trafficking. A portion of this paper will be dedicated to the reasons for and against taxation of illegally obtained revenues. In addressing this problem, the author shall rely on the US practice, wherein proceeds from unlawful sources are subject to taxation.
AB  - Krivično delo poreska utaja se najčešće ostvaruje davanjem lažnih podataka o stečenim prihodima i neprijavljivanjem stečenih prihoda, proizlazi iz našeg krivičnog zakonodavstva. Gramatičkim tumačenjem odredbe krivičnog zakonika koja propisuje ovo krivično delo može se zaključiti da prihodi koji se oporezuju mogu biti stečeni na zakonit i nezakonit način, jer se zakonodavac ne izjašnjava u pogledu ovog problema. Naime, izmenama i dopunama krivičnog zakonodavstva iz 2016. godine iz zakonskog opisa krivičnog dela poreska utaja brisana je reč 'zakonito'. Međutim, to ne znači da se mogu oporezovati nezakonito stečeni prihodi, što će u radu biti detaljno obrazloženo. Izvršićemo istraživanje sudske prakse u pogledu izricanja mere bezbednosti oduzimanje predmeta i mere oduzimanja imovinske koristi u krivičnim stvarima koje se odnose na krivično delo neovlašćena proizvodnja i stavljanje u promet opojnih droga iz člana 246 KZ. Na taj način ćemo utvrditi da li se efikasno primenjuju ove mere i da li se ovim merama mogu oduzeti prihodi koji su stečeni prodajom droge. Deo rada biće posvećen razlozima koji govore u prilog i protiv oporezivanja nezakonito stečenih prihoda. U razmatranju ovog problema autor će se osloniti na iskustva SAD koje oporezuju nezakonito stečene prihode.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Seizure or taxation of illegal income: Example of drug trafficking
T1  - Oduzimanje ili oporezivanje nezakonito stečenih prihoda - primer prodaje droge
IS  - 4
SP  - 199
EP  - 218
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_804
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The criminal offence of tax evasion is most frequently perpetrated by giving false data on the acquired income and failure to report acquired incomes, as defined in our criminal legislation. A linguistic analysis of the Criminal Code provision which defines this offence can lead to a conclusion that the income subject to taxation can be obtained either lawfully or unlawfully since the legislator does not take a stand regarding this issue. Namely, the 2016 amendments to the Criminal Code deleted the term 'legal' from the legal description of the criminal offence of tax evasion. However, this does not mean that the incomes acquired unlawfully can be subject to taxation, as the paper elaborates in detail. The author explores jurisprudence regarding the imposition of the security measure of the seizure of objects and the measure of seizure material gains in criminal matters related to the criminal offence of illegal production and circulation of narcotic as per Article 246 of the CC. In this way, we shall establish whether these measures are effectively implemented and whether they allow for seizing the incomes obtained from drug trafficking. A portion of this paper will be dedicated to the reasons for and against taxation of illegally obtained revenues. In addressing this problem, the author shall rely on the US practice, wherein proceeds from unlawful sources are subject to taxation., Krivično delo poreska utaja se najčešće ostvaruje davanjem lažnih podataka o stečenim prihodima i neprijavljivanjem stečenih prihoda, proizlazi iz našeg krivičnog zakonodavstva. Gramatičkim tumačenjem odredbe krivičnog zakonika koja propisuje ovo krivično delo može se zaključiti da prihodi koji se oporezuju mogu biti stečeni na zakonit i nezakonit način, jer se zakonodavac ne izjašnjava u pogledu ovog problema. Naime, izmenama i dopunama krivičnog zakonodavstva iz 2016. godine iz zakonskog opisa krivičnog dela poreska utaja brisana je reč 'zakonito'. Međutim, to ne znači da se mogu oporezovati nezakonito stečeni prihodi, što će u radu biti detaljno obrazloženo. Izvršićemo istraživanje sudske prakse u pogledu izricanja mere bezbednosti oduzimanje predmeta i mere oduzimanja imovinske koristi u krivičnim stvarima koje se odnose na krivično delo neovlašćena proizvodnja i stavljanje u promet opojnih droga iz člana 246 KZ. Na taj način ćemo utvrditi da li se efikasno primenjuju ove mere i da li se ovim merama mogu oduzeti prihodi koji su stečeni prodajom droge. Deo rada biće posvećen razlozima koji govore u prilog i protiv oporezivanja nezakonito stečenih prihoda. U razmatranju ovog problema autor će se osloniti na iskustva SAD koje oporezuju nezakonito stečene prihode.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Seizure or taxation of illegal income: Example of drug trafficking, Oduzimanje ili oporezivanje nezakonito stečenih prihoda - primer prodaje droge",
number = "4",
pages = "199-218",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_804"
}

Risimović, R.. (2017). Seizure or taxation of illegal income: Example of drug trafficking. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(4), 199-218.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_804

Risimović R. Seizure or taxation of illegal income: Example of drug trafficking. in Strani pravni život. 2017;(4):199-218.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_804 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Seizure or taxation of illegal income: Example of drug trafficking" in Strani pravni život, no. 4 (2017):199-218,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_804 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/716
AB  - The subject of this paper is regular sentencing in the Criminal Code of Serbia. In the first part of this paper, the authors will discuss the concept and types of sentencing. They will analyze the relation between the legal and court sentencing. In the second part of the paper, special attention will be paid to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances which the court takes into consideration while sentencing. These are the degree of guilt, the incentives for the offense that is committed, the degree of endangering or injurying the protected good, the circumstances under which the offense was committed, the past life of the perpetrator, his personal situation, his conduct after the commission of the 2 offense and, in particular, his relationship to the victim of the offense, as well as other circumstances related to the personality of the perpetrator. Eventually, the results of the research on sentencing will be presented in particular judgments. The authors of this paper analyzed 50 final court decisions of the Higher Court in Belgrade.
AB  - Predmet rada je redovno odmeravanje kazne u našem krivičnom pravu. U prvom delu rada autori će razmotriti pojam i vrste odmeravanja kazne. Analiziraće odnos zakonskog i sudskog odmeravanja kazne. U drugom delu rada će posebna pažnja biti posvećena olakšavajućim i otežavajućim okolnostima koje sud uzima u obzir pri odmeravanju kazne. To su stepen krivice, pobude iz kojih je delo učinjeno, jačina ugrožavanja ili povrede zaštićenog dobra, okolnosti pod kojima je delo učinjeno, raniji život učinioca, njegove lične prilike, njegovo držanje posle učinjenog krivičnog dela, a naročito njegov odnos prema žrtvi krivičnog dela, kao i druge okolnosti koje se odnose na ličnost učinioca. Na kraju, predstavićemo rezultate istraživanja o odmeravanju kazne u pojedinim krivičnim stvarima. Analiziraćemo 50 pravosnažnih presuda Višeg suda u Beogradu.
PB  - Univerzitet u Nišu
T2  - Teme
T1  - Redovno odmeravanje kazne
T1  - Regular sentencing
VL  - 40
IS  - 1
SP  - 1
EP  - 14
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_716
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav and Kolarić, Dragana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is regular sentencing in the Criminal Code of Serbia. In the first part of this paper, the authors will discuss the concept and types of sentencing. They will analyze the relation between the legal and court sentencing. In the second part of the paper, special attention will be paid to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances which the court takes into consideration while sentencing. These are the degree of guilt, the incentives for the offense that is committed, the degree of endangering or injurying the protected good, the circumstances under which the offense was committed, the past life of the perpetrator, his personal situation, his conduct after the commission of the 2 offense and, in particular, his relationship to the victim of the offense, as well as other circumstances related to the personality of the perpetrator. Eventually, the results of the research on sentencing will be presented in particular judgments. The authors of this paper analyzed 50 final court decisions of the Higher Court in Belgrade., Predmet rada je redovno odmeravanje kazne u našem krivičnom pravu. U prvom delu rada autori će razmotriti pojam i vrste odmeravanja kazne. Analiziraće odnos zakonskog i sudskog odmeravanja kazne. U drugom delu rada će posebna pažnja biti posvećena olakšavajućim i otežavajućim okolnostima koje sud uzima u obzir pri odmeravanju kazne. To su stepen krivice, pobude iz kojih je delo učinjeno, jačina ugrožavanja ili povrede zaštićenog dobra, okolnosti pod kojima je delo učinjeno, raniji život učinioca, njegove lične prilike, njegovo držanje posle učinjenog krivičnog dela, a naročito njegov odnos prema žrtvi krivičnog dela, kao i druge okolnosti koje se odnose na ličnost učinioca. Na kraju, predstavićemo rezultate istraživanja o odmeravanju kazne u pojedinim krivičnim stvarima. Analiziraćemo 50 pravosnažnih presuda Višeg suda u Beogradu.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Nišu",
journal = "Teme",
title = "Redovno odmeravanje kazne, Regular sentencing",
volume = "40",
number = "1",
pages = "1-14",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_716"
}

Risimović, R.,& Kolarić, D.. (2016). Redovno odmeravanje kazne. in Teme
Univerzitet u Nišu., 40(1), 1-14.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_716

Risimović R, Kolarić D. Redovno odmeravanje kazne. in Teme. 2016;40(1):1-14.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_716 .

Risimović, Radosav, Kolarić, Dragana, "Redovno odmeravanje kazne" in Teme, 40, no. 1 (2016):1-14,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_716 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/698
AB  - Giving false data exists as a form of criminal offence if the offender submits a tax application which contains false data regarding legally acquired income, on items or other facts that are relevant for determining tax liabilities. This form of criminal offence exists if the offender shows the revenue in smaller amounts comparing to the actual income, the items that are the property of the tax payer are displayed in a smaller value, the expenses are shown larger than the actual ones or other false facts that affect the amount of tax are displayed. For example, the accused showed in invoice the value of sold vehicles that is almost twice lower than the price paid. The act will be realized if false information is given in written tax application, or if subsequently false information requested by the tax authorities is provided. This offence can be done only in respect of legally acquired income, although on this issue there is no generally accepted opinion in the theory of criminal law. Other form of committing the tax evasion offence is failure to report legally acquired income, or objects or other facts that are important for determining tax liabilities, in the case of mandatory application. The offence is committed, if the offender does not submit a tax application in timely manner or submits an incomplete application, i.e. does not enter all relevant information which may affect the decision on the tax amount. For example, the offender does not indicate all income sources. At the end, the offender may commit tax evasion by 'concealing information otherwise' which are related to the determination of tax liabilities. Concealment is any action with the purpose of preventing the tax authorities to get the data that are relevant for determining tax liabilities. For example, a tax payer hides the financial reports and thus prevents the tax authorities to determine the tax liability.
AB  - Tema rada je radnja izvršenja krivičnog dela poreske utaje. Reč je o najvažnijem poreskom krivičnom delu za koje se vezuju brojne nedoumice. Sporno je da li se mogu oporezovati nezakoniti prihodi. Poreska utaja je po svojoj prirodi blanketno krivično delo, jer odredba koja ga propisuje upućuje na druge norme, pre svega na norme poreskog zakonodavstva. U vezi sa tim, ne postoji opšteprihvaćeno mišljenje kako razlikovati pravnu zabludu od stvarne zablude kod ovog krivičnog dela. Pokušaćemo da odgovorimo na pitanje na koji način se može preduzeti alternativno propisana radnja izvršenja krivičnog dela poreske utaje. Tema rada nije dovoljno obrađena u krivičnopravnoj literaturi, zbog čega smo naše istraživanje zasnovali između ostalog, na velikom broju presuda najviših sudskih instanci.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Offence of tax evasion
T1  - Radnja izvršenja krivičnog dela poreske utaje
VL  - 21
IS  - 3
SP  - 1
EP  - 18
DO  - 10.5937/nabepo21-12434
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Giving false data exists as a form of criminal offence if the offender submits a tax application which contains false data regarding legally acquired income, on items or other facts that are relevant for determining tax liabilities. This form of criminal offence exists if the offender shows the revenue in smaller amounts comparing to the actual income, the items that are the property of the tax payer are displayed in a smaller value, the expenses are shown larger than the actual ones or other false facts that affect the amount of tax are displayed. For example, the accused showed in invoice the value of sold vehicles that is almost twice lower than the price paid. The act will be realized if false information is given in written tax application, or if subsequently false information requested by the tax authorities is provided. This offence can be done only in respect of legally acquired income, although on this issue there is no generally accepted opinion in the theory of criminal law. Other form of committing the tax evasion offence is failure to report legally acquired income, or objects or other facts that are important for determining tax liabilities, in the case of mandatory application. The offence is committed, if the offender does not submit a tax application in timely manner or submits an incomplete application, i.e. does not enter all relevant information which may affect the decision on the tax amount. For example, the offender does not indicate all income sources. At the end, the offender may commit tax evasion by 'concealing information otherwise' which are related to the determination of tax liabilities. Concealment is any action with the purpose of preventing the tax authorities to get the data that are relevant for determining tax liabilities. For example, a tax payer hides the financial reports and thus prevents the tax authorities to determine the tax liability., Tema rada je radnja izvršenja krivičnog dela poreske utaje. Reč je o najvažnijem poreskom krivičnom delu za koje se vezuju brojne nedoumice. Sporno je da li se mogu oporezovati nezakoniti prihodi. Poreska utaja je po svojoj prirodi blanketno krivično delo, jer odredba koja ga propisuje upućuje na druge norme, pre svega na norme poreskog zakonodavstva. U vezi sa tim, ne postoji opšteprihvaćeno mišljenje kako razlikovati pravnu zabludu od stvarne zablude kod ovog krivičnog dela. Pokušaćemo da odgovorimo na pitanje na koji način se može preduzeti alternativno propisana radnja izvršenja krivičnog dela poreske utaje. Tema rada nije dovoljno obrađena u krivičnopravnoj literaturi, zbog čega smo naše istraživanje zasnovali između ostalog, na velikom broju presuda najviših sudskih instanci.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Offence of tax evasion, Radnja izvršenja krivičnog dela poreske utaje",
volume = "21",
number = "3",
pages = "1-18",
doi = "10.5937/nabepo21-12434"
}

Risimović, R.. (2016). Offence of tax evasion. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 21(3), 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo21-12434

Risimović R. Offence of tax evasion. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2016;21(3):1-18.
doi:10.5937/nabepo21-12434 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Offence of tax evasion" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 21, no. 3 (2016):1-18,
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo21-12434 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1651
AB  - The subject of this paper is personal characteristics of the perpetrator, its significance for sentencing
in Criminal
Legislation,
Criminal
Law
Literature
and
jurisprudence.
In
the
first
part
of
the
paper,

the
author
will consider
the
term
and
types
of
sentencing
as well
as circumstances
which
are
relevant
for

sentencing
in our
Criminal
Legislation.
Special
attention
will be
paid
to
the
influence
of
personal
characteristics
of
perpetrator
for
sentencing.
There
is a great
number
of
dilemmas in theory
and
jurisprudence
related
to
this
topic
to
the
resolution
of
which
the
author
will try
to
contribute.
In
principle
there
is no unique

opinion
on
what
is meant
by
personal
characteristics
of
perpetrator.
If
the
perpetrator
has a profession

which
is of
high
social
importance
(policeman,
doctor,
etc.),
it
is unclear
whether
this
circumstance
should

be
taken
into
account
as mitigating
or
aggravating.
Also,
there
is a question
whether
the
unemployment

of
perpetrator
should
be
taken
into
account
in sentencing
as aggravating
or
mitigating
circumstance.
It
is

disputable
whether
the
courts
should
take
into
account
only
personal
characteristics
that
existed
in time of

execution
of
offense
or
the
ones
occurred
after
commission
of
offense
are
relevant
as well.
Finally, the results of jurisprudence research will be presented in this paper which almost always takes
personal characteristics of perpetrator as mitigating circumstance. The author will explain his critical opinion
on
court’s
proceeding
in sentencing.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija = Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies
C3  - Tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja. Tom 2 / Međunarodni naučni skup “Dani Arčibalda Rajsa”, Beograd, 3-4. mart 2015. = Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance. Vol. 2 / International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”, Belgrade, 3-4 March 2015
T1  - Personal characteristics of the perpetrator and sentencing
SP  - 321
EP  - 329
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1651
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Risimović, Radosav and Kolarić, Dragana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is personal characteristics of the perpetrator, its significance for sentencing
in Criminal
Legislation,
Criminal
Law
Literature
and
jurisprudence.
In
the
first
part
of
the
paper,

the
author
will consider
the
term
and
types
of
sentencing
as well
as circumstances
which
are
relevant
for

sentencing
in our
Criminal
Legislation.
Special
attention
will be
paid
to
the
influence
of
personal
characteristics
of
perpetrator
for
sentencing.
There
is a great
number
of
dilemmas in theory
and
jurisprudence
related
to
this
topic
to
the
resolution
of
which
the
author
will try
to
contribute.
In
principle
there
is no unique

opinion
on
what
is meant
by
personal
characteristics
of
perpetrator.
If
the
perpetrator
has a profession

which
is of
high
social
importance
(policeman,
doctor,
etc.),
it
is unclear
whether
this
circumstance
should

be
taken
into
account
as mitigating
or
aggravating.
Also,
there
is a question
whether
the
unemployment

of
perpetrator
should
be
taken
into
account
in sentencing
as aggravating
or
mitigating
circumstance.
It
is

disputable
whether
the
courts
should
take
into
account
only
personal
characteristics
that
existed
in time of

execution
of
offense
or
the
ones
occurred
after
commission
of
offense
are
relevant
as well.
Finally, the results of jurisprudence research will be presented in this paper which almost always takes
personal characteristics of perpetrator as mitigating circumstance. The author will explain his critical opinion
on
court’s
proceeding
in sentencing.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija = Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies",
journal = "Tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja. Tom 2 / Međunarodni naučni skup “Dani Arčibalda Rajsa”, Beograd, 3-4. mart 2015. = Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance. Vol. 2 / International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”, Belgrade, 3-4 March 2015",
title = "Personal characteristics of the perpetrator and sentencing",
pages = "321-329",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1651"
}

Risimović, R.,& Kolarić, D.. (2015). Personal characteristics of the perpetrator and sentencing. in Tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja. Tom 2 / Međunarodni naučni skup “Dani Arčibalda Rajsa”, Beograd, 3-4. mart 2015. = Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance. Vol. 2 / International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”, Belgrade, 3-4 March 2015
Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija = Belgrade : Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies., 321-329.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1651

Risimović R, Kolarić D. Personal characteristics of the perpetrator and sentencing. in Tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja. Tom 2 / Međunarodni naučni skup “Dani Arčibalda Rajsa”, Beograd, 3-4. mart 2015. = Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance. Vol. 2 / International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”, Belgrade, 3-4 March 2015. 2015;:321-329.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1651 .

Risimović, Radosav, Kolarić, Dragana, "Personal characteristics of the perpetrator and sentencing" in Tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja. Tom 2 / Međunarodni naučni skup “Dani Arčibalda Rajsa”, Beograd, 3-4. mart 2015. = Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance. Vol. 2 / International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”, Belgrade, 3-4 March 2015 (2015):321-329,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1651 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/596
AB  - The subject of this paper is inevitability of mistake of law in Criminal Law. In the first part of paper the author analyzes term and the effect of mistake of law in the German criminal law. Furthermore, the theory of premeditation and theory of guilt are analyzed as a theoretical basis for distinguishing the mistake of fact and mistake of law. To the acceptance of the theory of guilt during 70's of last century in German Criminal Law there was no mistake of law as an autonomous institute. It has been pointed out the importance and advantages of the theory of guilt in relation to the theory of premeditation. The author analyzes the relationship between mistake of law and premeditation in case when mistake of law is avoidable. The view that mistake of law regardless it is avoidable or unavoidable is not significant for the existence of premeditation is substantiated. Premeditation is not excluded as the awareness of the unlawfulness is an independent element of guilt, as well as premeditation. This view can not be questioned, because it may happen that the perpetrator with premeditation performs act, but because of unavoidable or avoidable mistake of law did not know that the act is prohibited. The existence of premeditation is not in question; the existence of guilt depends on whether the mistake of law in the particular case is avoidable or unavoidable. Part of this paper refers to the evaluation of criteria by which the German theory and jurisprudence establish whether the mistake of law is avoidable or unavoidable. The prevailing concept according to which the effect of mistake of law depends on three criteria: 1. whether in particular case there was reason for perpetrator to doubt that the act is prohibited; 2. whether there was a real possibility that the perpetrator finds out whether the act is prohibited; 3. whether the perpetrator could have known that the act is prohibited.
AB  - U prvom delu rada razmatramo pojam pravne zablude u nemačkom pravu. Osim toga, analiziraćemo dejstvo pravne zablude. Na kraju, najveći deo rada se odnosi na razmatranje kriterijuma koji nemačka pravna teorija i sudska praksa koriste pri oceni da li je pravna zabluda u konkretnom slučaju otklonjiva ili neotklonjiva. Ovo je veoma značajno pitanje, jer od odgovora zavisi dejstvo ovog instituta krivičnog prava. Obrazložićemo naše zalaganje za prihvatanje objektivno-subjektivnog kriterijuma otklonjivosti pravne zablude. Pokušaćemo da uočimo sličnosti i razlike između rešenja koje je u pogledu otklonjivosti pravne zablude prihvaćeno u našem KZ i zakonodavstvu Nemačke. Pri izradi rada je korišćen dogmatski i logički metod.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Elimination of legal error in German law
T1  - Otklonjivost pravne zablude u nemačkom pravu
IS  - 3
SP  - 57
EP  - 71
DO  - 10.5937/NBP1403057R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is inevitability of mistake of law in Criminal Law. In the first part of paper the author analyzes term and the effect of mistake of law in the German criminal law. Furthermore, the theory of premeditation and theory of guilt are analyzed as a theoretical basis for distinguishing the mistake of fact and mistake of law. To the acceptance of the theory of guilt during 70's of last century in German Criminal Law there was no mistake of law as an autonomous institute. It has been pointed out the importance and advantages of the theory of guilt in relation to the theory of premeditation. The author analyzes the relationship between mistake of law and premeditation in case when mistake of law is avoidable. The view that mistake of law regardless it is avoidable or unavoidable is not significant for the existence of premeditation is substantiated. Premeditation is not excluded as the awareness of the unlawfulness is an independent element of guilt, as well as premeditation. This view can not be questioned, because it may happen that the perpetrator with premeditation performs act, but because of unavoidable or avoidable mistake of law did not know that the act is prohibited. The existence of premeditation is not in question; the existence of guilt depends on whether the mistake of law in the particular case is avoidable or unavoidable. Part of this paper refers to the evaluation of criteria by which the German theory and jurisprudence establish whether the mistake of law is avoidable or unavoidable. The prevailing concept according to which the effect of mistake of law depends on three criteria: 1. whether in particular case there was reason for perpetrator to doubt that the act is prohibited; 2. whether there was a real possibility that the perpetrator finds out whether the act is prohibited; 3. whether the perpetrator could have known that the act is prohibited., U prvom delu rada razmatramo pojam pravne zablude u nemačkom pravu. Osim toga, analiziraćemo dejstvo pravne zablude. Na kraju, najveći deo rada se odnosi na razmatranje kriterijuma koji nemačka pravna teorija i sudska praksa koriste pri oceni da li je pravna zabluda u konkretnom slučaju otklonjiva ili neotklonjiva. Ovo je veoma značajno pitanje, jer od odgovora zavisi dejstvo ovog instituta krivičnog prava. Obrazložićemo naše zalaganje za prihvatanje objektivno-subjektivnog kriterijuma otklonjivosti pravne zablude. Pokušaćemo da uočimo sličnosti i razlike između rešenja koje je u pogledu otklonjivosti pravne zablude prihvaćeno u našem KZ i zakonodavstvu Nemačke. Pri izradi rada je korišćen dogmatski i logički metod.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Elimination of legal error in German law, Otklonjivost pravne zablude u nemačkom pravu",
number = "3",
pages = "57-71",
doi = "10.5937/NBP1403057R"
}

Risimović, R.. (2014). Elimination of legal error in German law. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd.(3), 57-71.
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1403057R

Risimović R. Elimination of legal error in German law. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2014;(3):57-71.
doi:10.5937/NBP1403057R .

Risimović, Radosav, "Elimination of legal error in German law" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, no. 3 (2014):57-71,
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1403057R . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ђорђевић, Ђорђе
AU  - Коларић, Драгана
AU  - Рисимовић, Радосав
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1659
PB  - Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије
T2  - Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС
T1  - Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7
SP  - 357
EP  - 401
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ђорђевић, Ђорђе and Коларић, Драгана and Рисимовић, Радосав",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије",
journal = "Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС",
booktitle = "Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7",
pages = "357-401",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659"
}

Ђорђевић, Ђ., Коларић, Д.,& Рисимовић, Р.. (2013). Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7. in Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС
Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије., 357-401.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659

Ђорђевић Ђ, Коларић Д, Рисимовић Р. Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7. in Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС. 2013;:357-401.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659 .

Ђорђевић, Ђорђе, Коларић, Драгана, Рисимовић, Радосав, "Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7" in Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС (2013):357-401,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/459
AB  - Duress in English law is treated as general defense along with the necessity and self-defense. A common feature of these institutes mentioned above is a necessity. There are several theories about the legal nature of duress, but the prevalent is the one based on exclusion of perpetrator’s guilt i.e. punishment. The second part refers to conditions whose fulfillment is necessary in order to court allow the duress in an individual case. In this regard, taken the view that duress should be the excuse for the most serious crimes (murder and attempted murder), although this view was not supported by practice.
AB  - Tema ovog rada je nesumnjivo jedan od najvažnijih instituta krivičnog prava. Na značaj prinude u Engleskoj ukazuje njeno dejstvo u odnosu na učinioca krivičnog dela. Međutim, u krivičnopravnoj literaturi ne postoji jedinstveno gledište o pravnoj prirodi prinude. Određujući uslove za njenu primenu, zakonodavstvo, sudska praksa i teorija pokušavaju da pomire dva suprotstavljena interesa. Na jednoj strani treba zaštititi oštećenog, ali istovremeno se ne može zanemariti činjenica da je učinilac doneo odluku o ostvarenju krivičnog dela pod uticajem pretnje. Iako odbrana prinudom u slučaju ubistva i pokušaja ubistva nije dozvoljena, u drugom delu rada je posebna pažnja posvećena problemu eventualne primene prinude kod najtežih krivičnih dela.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - The threat of murder or serious bodily injury in English law
T1  - Pretnja ubistvom ili nanošenjem teške telesne povrede u engleskom pravu
IS  - 1
SP  - 169
EP  - 181
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_459
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Duress in English law is treated as general defense along with the necessity and self-defense. A common feature of these institutes mentioned above is a necessity. There are several theories about the legal nature of duress, but the prevalent is the one based on exclusion of perpetrator’s guilt i.e. punishment. The second part refers to conditions whose fulfillment is necessary in order to court allow the duress in an individual case. In this regard, taken the view that duress should be the excuse for the most serious crimes (murder and attempted murder), although this view was not supported by practice., Tema ovog rada je nesumnjivo jedan od najvažnijih instituta krivičnog prava. Na značaj prinude u Engleskoj ukazuje njeno dejstvo u odnosu na učinioca krivičnog dela. Međutim, u krivičnopravnoj literaturi ne postoji jedinstveno gledište o pravnoj prirodi prinude. Određujući uslove za njenu primenu, zakonodavstvo, sudska praksa i teorija pokušavaju da pomire dva suprotstavljena interesa. Na jednoj strani treba zaštititi oštećenog, ali istovremeno se ne može zanemariti činjenica da je učinilac doneo odluku o ostvarenju krivičnog dela pod uticajem pretnje. Iako odbrana prinudom u slučaju ubistva i pokušaja ubistva nije dozvoljena, u drugom delu rada je posebna pažnja posvećena problemu eventualne primene prinude kod najtežih krivičnih dela.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "The threat of murder or serious bodily injury in English law, Pretnja ubistvom ili nanošenjem teške telesne povrede u engleskom pravu",
number = "1",
pages = "169-181",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_459"
}

Risimović, R.. (2012). The threat of murder or serious bodily injury in English law. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(1), 169-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_459

Risimović R. The threat of murder or serious bodily injury in English law. in Strani pravni život. 2012;(1):169-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_459 .

Risimović, Radosav, "The threat of murder or serious bodily injury in English law" in Strani pravni život, no. 1 (2012):169-181,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_459 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/439
AB  - The subject of this paper is necessity in the German Criminal Law. Special attention is given to the concept and the legal nature of necessity, terms and limits for the application of this institute in the country. An explanation has been given of the so called differentiating theory of necessity in German Criminal Law according to which there are two types of the institute: justifying and excusing. The closing part of the paper gives reasons in favor of accepting the differentiating theory in our country. The following reasons are presented. It is not appropriate to regulate in one provision: 1) the perpetration of a crime in order to save more valuable legal interest and 2) the perpetration of a crime in order to save interest having the same or smaller importance as compared to the interest which is injured or endangered. The opinion of German theories of provoked danger also favours the differentiating theory. In order to enable better understanding of the topics dealt with in this paper, a few of court rulings from German judicial practice are considered.
AB  - U radu se razmatra pravna priroda i svrha primene krajnje nužde u nemačkom krivičnom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uslovima za primenu krajnje nužde i problemima sa kojima se suočava sudska praksa. Analizira se i odnos nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, s obzirom da je stanje nužde karakteristično za oba instituta. Takođe, obrazložena je u Nemačkoj vladajuća tzv. diferencirajuća teorija, prema kojoj postoje dve vrste krajnje nužde: opravdavajuća i izvinjavajuća. Na kraju rada je ukazano na razloge za prihvatanje ove koncepcije i u našem zakonodavstvu.
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Necessity in German criminal law
T1  - Krajnja nužda u Nemačkom pravu
VL  - 54
IS  - 3
SP  - 200
EP  - 215
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is necessity in the German Criminal Law. Special attention is given to the concept and the legal nature of necessity, terms and limits for the application of this institute in the country. An explanation has been given of the so called differentiating theory of necessity in German Criminal Law according to which there are two types of the institute: justifying and excusing. The closing part of the paper gives reasons in favor of accepting the differentiating theory in our country. The following reasons are presented. It is not appropriate to regulate in one provision: 1) the perpetration of a crime in order to save more valuable legal interest and 2) the perpetration of a crime in order to save interest having the same or smaller importance as compared to the interest which is injured or endangered. The opinion of German theories of provoked danger also favours the differentiating theory. In order to enable better understanding of the topics dealt with in this paper, a few of court rulings from German judicial practice are considered., U radu se razmatra pravna priroda i svrha primene krajnje nužde u nemačkom krivičnom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uslovima za primenu krajnje nužde i problemima sa kojima se suočava sudska praksa. Analizira se i odnos nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, s obzirom da je stanje nužde karakteristično za oba instituta. Takođe, obrazložena je u Nemačkoj vladajuća tzv. diferencirajuća teorija, prema kojoj postoje dve vrste krajnje nužde: opravdavajuća i izvinjavajuća. Na kraju rada je ukazano na razloge za prihvatanje ove koncepcije i u našem zakonodavstvu.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Necessity in German criminal law, Krajnja nužda u Nemačkom pravu",
volume = "54",
number = "3",
pages = "200-215",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439"
}

Risimović, R.. (2012). Necessity in German criminal law. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 54(3), 200-215.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439

Risimović R. Necessity in German criminal law. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2012;54(3):200-215.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Necessity in German criminal law" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 54, no. 3 (2012):200-215,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/423
AB  - English law, practice and theory differentiate mistake of law and mistake of fact and a criterion for this demarcation is a matter referred to a wrong assumption of the perpetrator. Mistake of fact is the basis which excludes the existence of the offence. According to the traditional view, the defendant may be released only if the mistake is reasonably grounded, but in current practice and theory prevails subjective notion of mistake, according to which it is enough that a perpetrator honestly believes in the existence of relevant facts. The author has tried to answer the question, under what circumstances the defendant may rely on mistake, i.e. why a mistake of fact which is based on reasonable grounds may be relevant to criminal law.
AB  - U uvodnim izlaganjima pojmovno su razgraničene zabluda o činjenicama i pravna zabluda u engleskom pravu. Međutim, predmet rada je razmatranje stvarne zablude ili zablude o činjenicama. U prvom delu rada autor će predstaviti dve različite koncepcije tog instituta: objektivnu i subjektivnu. S obzirom na to da je reč o suprotstavljenim shvatanjima, biće izneti i argumenti koje ističu zastupnici kako prvog, tako i drugog gledišta. Na kraju će biti obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem koje preovladava, a prema kome je za oslobađanje optuženog dovoljno da on iskreno veruje u postojanje relevantnih činjenica, ili da je pogrešna predstava o njima zasnovana na iskrenom uverenju. Posebna pažnja je posvećena pitanju kako kvalifikovati situaciju u kojoj je optuženi bio u zabludi pod uticajem alkohola ili droge.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Mistake of fact in English law
T1  - Stvarna zabluda u engleskom pravu
VL  - 16
IS  - 2
SP  - 77
EP  - 85
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_423
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2011",
abstract = "English law, practice and theory differentiate mistake of law and mistake of fact and a criterion for this demarcation is a matter referred to a wrong assumption of the perpetrator. Mistake of fact is the basis which excludes the existence of the offence. According to the traditional view, the defendant may be released only if the mistake is reasonably grounded, but in current practice and theory prevails subjective notion of mistake, according to which it is enough that a perpetrator honestly believes in the existence of relevant facts. The author has tried to answer the question, under what circumstances the defendant may rely on mistake, i.e. why a mistake of fact which is based on reasonable grounds may be relevant to criminal law., U uvodnim izlaganjima pojmovno su razgraničene zabluda o činjenicama i pravna zabluda u engleskom pravu. Međutim, predmet rada je razmatranje stvarne zablude ili zablude o činjenicama. U prvom delu rada autor će predstaviti dve različite koncepcije tog instituta: objektivnu i subjektivnu. S obzirom na to da je reč o suprotstavljenim shvatanjima, biće izneti i argumenti koje ističu zastupnici kako prvog, tako i drugog gledišta. Na kraju će biti obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem koje preovladava, a prema kome je za oslobađanje optuženog dovoljno da on iskreno veruje u postojanje relevantnih činjenica, ili da je pogrešna predstava o njima zasnovana na iskrenom uverenju. Posebna pažnja je posvećena pitanju kako kvalifikovati situaciju u kojoj je optuženi bio u zabludi pod uticajem alkohola ili droge.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Mistake of fact in English law, Stvarna zabluda u engleskom pravu",
volume = "16",
number = "2",
pages = "77-85",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_423"
}

Risimović, R.. (2011). Mistake of fact in English law. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 16(2), 77-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_423

Risimović R. Mistake of fact in English law. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2011;16(2):77-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_423 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Mistake of fact in English law" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 16, no. 2 (2011):77-85,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_423 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/420
AB  - The subject of the article is induced self-defense, i.e. a situation where a person (the challenger or a provocateur) induces with his conduct unlawful an attack by another person (provoked or induced). In our literature, the problem of provocation is not sufficiently considered, although it is a problem that involves very complex life situations and conflicts of interest that are not to be solved in a simple way. The Criminal Code does not contain a provision which regulates induced assaults, hence the issue was left to practice. In this regard, there are a number of dilemmas to the resolution of which this paper attempts to contribute. For example, there is the question of whether the challenger has the right to take defensive action against the challenged person and whether this right is limited? Is the attack of the challenged person always to be qualified as an unlawful attack? How to solve the situation in which both the challenger and the challenged take illegal actions? .
AB  - Tema rada je izazvana nužna odbrana, tj. situacija kada jedno lice (provokator ili izazivač) svojim ponašanjem izazove protivpravni napad drugog lica (provociranog ili izazvanog). U našoj krivično-pravnoj literaturi problem provokacije napada nije dovoljno razmatran, iako je reč o problemu koji podrazumeva veoma složene životne situacije i konflikte interesa koje nije jednostavno rešiti. Krivični zakonik Srbije ne sadrži odredbu koja reguliše izazvani napad, već je to pitanje prepušteno sudskoj praksi. U vezi sa tim, postoji i veliki broj nedoumica čijem rešavanju ovaj rad pokušava da doprinese. Na primer, da li izazivač ima pravo da odbije napad izazvanog i da li je to njegovo pravo ograničeno? Da li se napad izazvanog uvek može kvalifikovati kao protivpravni napad? Kako rešiti situaciju u kojoj izazivač i izazvani preduzimaju protivpravne radnje? .
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Induced self-defense
T1  - Izazvana nužna odbrana
VL  - 53
IS  - 2
SP  - 168
EP  - 181
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_420
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2011",
abstract = "The subject of the article is induced self-defense, i.e. a situation where a person (the challenger or a provocateur) induces with his conduct unlawful an attack by another person (provoked or induced). In our literature, the problem of provocation is not sufficiently considered, although it is a problem that involves very complex life situations and conflicts of interest that are not to be solved in a simple way. The Criminal Code does not contain a provision which regulates induced assaults, hence the issue was left to practice. In this regard, there are a number of dilemmas to the resolution of which this paper attempts to contribute. For example, there is the question of whether the challenger has the right to take defensive action against the challenged person and whether this right is limited? Is the attack of the challenged person always to be qualified as an unlawful attack? How to solve the situation in which both the challenger and the challenged take illegal actions? ., Tema rada je izazvana nužna odbrana, tj. situacija kada jedno lice (provokator ili izazivač) svojim ponašanjem izazove protivpravni napad drugog lica (provociranog ili izazvanog). U našoj krivično-pravnoj literaturi problem provokacije napada nije dovoljno razmatran, iako je reč o problemu koji podrazumeva veoma složene životne situacije i konflikte interesa koje nije jednostavno rešiti. Krivični zakonik Srbije ne sadrži odredbu koja reguliše izazvani napad, već je to pitanje prepušteno sudskoj praksi. U vezi sa tim, postoji i veliki broj nedoumica čijem rešavanju ovaj rad pokušava da doprinese. Na primer, da li izazivač ima pravo da odbije napad izazvanog i da li je to njegovo pravo ograničeno? Da li se napad izazvanog uvek može kvalifikovati kao protivpravni napad? Kako rešiti situaciju u kojoj izazivač i izazvani preduzimaju protivpravne radnje? .",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Induced self-defense, Izazvana nužna odbrana",
volume = "53",
number = "2",
pages = "168-181",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_420"
}

Risimović, R.. (2011). Induced self-defense. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 53(2), 168-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_420

Risimović R. Induced self-defense. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2011;53(2):168-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_420 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Induced self-defense" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 53, no. 2 (2011):168-181,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_420 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/317
AB  - The subject of this paper is legal description of misconduct in office in our criminal legislation. Related to the very subject, we believe it is necessary to change the Criminal Code in the sense of narrowing the group of persons that could appear as perpetrators. Consistent implementation of legality and legal security principles requires the regulations according to which only legal person can realize this offence. The idea of necessity to erase this criminal act from the Criminal Code (because of lack of definition of alternatively regulated execution act) is not justified for two interdependent reasons: first, the existence of common criminal act does not impede the punishment for special offences, on condition that all conditions anticipated by the law are fulfilled (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Second, disregarding efforts made by the legislator, it is not realistic to expect every single procedure pointed against official duty to be regulated as criminal act. This criminal act is executed at the moment of performing the forbidden consequence, that is, when perpetrator obtains any benefit for himself or other physical or legal person by committed action, causes any damage, or seriously violates another person's rights. When it comes to establishing benefits, damages, or violation of people's right, we believe that it is necessary to use only objective criteria, although our literature at some points supports opposite standpoints. Comparative legal analysis of criminal acts against public administration in the Spanish Criminal Code points at the fact that in this country another concept of criminal acts regulation is accepted.
AB  - Predmet rada je zakonski opis krivičnog dela zloupotrebe službenog položaja u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. U pogledu subjekta ovog dela, autor će izneti razloge u prilog izmene Krivičnog zakonika, što bi vodilo sužavanju kruga lica koja se mogu pojaviti kao učinioci. Sa druge strane, biće obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem pojedinih pisaca koji, uzimajući u obzir neodređenost alternativno propisane radnje izvršenja, predlažu brisanje ovog krivičnog dela iz Krivičnog zakonika. Deo rada posvećen je kriterijumima za utvrđivanju posledice, tj. odgovoru na pitanje šta se u smislu člana 359. stav 1. može smatrati pribavljanjem koristi, nanošenjem štete ili težom povredom prava drugog. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uporedno-pravnoj analizi krivičnih dela protiv javne uprave u španskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Misconduct in office
T1  - Zloupotreba službenog položaja
VL  - 15
IS  - 1
SP  - 127
EP  - 140
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_317
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2010",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is legal description of misconduct in office in our criminal legislation. Related to the very subject, we believe it is necessary to change the Criminal Code in the sense of narrowing the group of persons that could appear as perpetrators. Consistent implementation of legality and legal security principles requires the regulations according to which only legal person can realize this offence. The idea of necessity to erase this criminal act from the Criminal Code (because of lack of definition of alternatively regulated execution act) is not justified for two interdependent reasons: first, the existence of common criminal act does not impede the punishment for special offences, on condition that all conditions anticipated by the law are fulfilled (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Second, disregarding efforts made by the legislator, it is not realistic to expect every single procedure pointed against official duty to be regulated as criminal act. This criminal act is executed at the moment of performing the forbidden consequence, that is, when perpetrator obtains any benefit for himself or other physical or legal person by committed action, causes any damage, or seriously violates another person's rights. When it comes to establishing benefits, damages, or violation of people's right, we believe that it is necessary to use only objective criteria, although our literature at some points supports opposite standpoints. Comparative legal analysis of criminal acts against public administration in the Spanish Criminal Code points at the fact that in this country another concept of criminal acts regulation is accepted., Predmet rada je zakonski opis krivičnog dela zloupotrebe službenog položaja u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. U pogledu subjekta ovog dela, autor će izneti razloge u prilog izmene Krivičnog zakonika, što bi vodilo sužavanju kruga lica koja se mogu pojaviti kao učinioci. Sa druge strane, biće obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem pojedinih pisaca koji, uzimajući u obzir neodređenost alternativno propisane radnje izvršenja, predlažu brisanje ovog krivičnog dela iz Krivičnog zakonika. Deo rada posvećen je kriterijumima za utvrđivanju posledice, tj. odgovoru na pitanje šta se u smislu člana 359. stav 1. može smatrati pribavljanjem koristi, nanošenjem štete ili težom povredom prava drugog. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uporedno-pravnoj analizi krivičnih dela protiv javne uprave u španskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Misconduct in office, Zloupotreba službenog položaja",
volume = "15",
number = "1",
pages = "127-140",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_317"
}

Risimović, R.. (2010). Misconduct in office. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 15(1), 127-140.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_317

Risimović R. Misconduct in office. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2010;15(1):127-140.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_317 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Misconduct in office" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 15, no. 1 (2010):127-140,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_317 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/259
AB  - The subject matter of this paper is one of the most important criminal law institutes. The purpose of this institute together with its effect on perpetrator of a crime points out the significance of self-defense within contemporary legislation. It is well known that self-defense protects the law against non-law, that is, protects legal property of the attacked person against unlawful attack. Although our legal practice researches showed that generally we can speak of protection of the most important properties of every human being: life, physical integrity, and property. Moreover, unlawful attack violates the legal system, while the use of self-defense contributes to its reestablishing. But, did the legislator want to provide protection exclusively to the attacked person or legal system, without taking into account the interest of the perpetrator? It is interesting to know that nowadays there are numerous discussions in Germany related to whether criminal act of extortion of evidence by officials can be justified by self-defense of another, in spite of prohibition of torture in proceedings in front of governmental agencies, contained in criminal law regulations, the Constitution, police rights standards, and international conventions. It is generally known that police officials frequently find themselves such situations as may require self-defense or repelling unlawful attacks from their own property. This raises a question whether it is justified to apply criminal legislation regulations related to self-defense in this case, or is the priority given to police regulations related to use of force? .
AB  - Tema ovog rada je nesumnjivo jedan od najvažnijih instituta krivičnog prava. Na značaj nužne odbrane u savremenim zakonodavstvima, teoriji i sudskoj praksi ukazuje svrha primene ovog instituta i dejstvo u odnosu na učinioca krivičnog dela. Dobro je poznato da se nužnom odbranom štiti pravo od neprava, tj. štite pravna dobra napadnutog lica od protivpravnog napada. Naša istraživanja sudske prakse su pokazala da se najčešće može govoriti o zaštiti najznačajnijih dobara svakog čoveka: života, telesnog integriteta i imovine. Štaviše, preduzimanjem protivpravnog napada narušava se pravni poredak, dok primena nužne odbrane doprinosi njegovom ponovnom uspostavljanju. Ali, da li je zakonodavac želeo da obezbedi zaštitu isključivo napadnutom i pravnom poretku, zanemarujući interese napadača? Zanimljivo je da se danas u Nemačkoj vode rasprave da li se krivično delo iznuđivanje iskaza od strane službenog lica može opravdati nužnom odbranom drugoga, uprkos zabrani torture u postupcima pred državnim organima koja je sadržana u krivično-pravnim propisima, Ustavu, normama policijskog prava i međunarodnim konvencijama. Poznato je da su policijski službenici, zbog prirode profesije koju obavljaju, često u prilici da pružaju nužnu pomoć ili odbijaju protivpravni napad od svog dobra. Nameće se pitanje, da li je opravdano u tom slučaju primeniti propise krivičnog zakonodavstva koji regulišu nužnu odbranu, ili prednost imaju odredbe policijskog prava koje se odnose na upotrebu sredstava prinude? .
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Necessary defense and rights and duties of police officers
T1  - Nužna odbrana i prava i dužnosti policijskih službenika
VL  - 51
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 386
EP  - 398
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_259
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2009",
abstract = "The subject matter of this paper is one of the most important criminal law institutes. The purpose of this institute together with its effect on perpetrator of a crime points out the significance of self-defense within contemporary legislation. It is well known that self-defense protects the law against non-law, that is, protects legal property of the attacked person against unlawful attack. Although our legal practice researches showed that generally we can speak of protection of the most important properties of every human being: life, physical integrity, and property. Moreover, unlawful attack violates the legal system, while the use of self-defense contributes to its reestablishing. But, did the legislator want to provide protection exclusively to the attacked person or legal system, without taking into account the interest of the perpetrator? It is interesting to know that nowadays there are numerous discussions in Germany related to whether criminal act of extortion of evidence by officials can be justified by self-defense of another, in spite of prohibition of torture in proceedings in front of governmental agencies, contained in criminal law regulations, the Constitution, police rights standards, and international conventions. It is generally known that police officials frequently find themselves such situations as may require self-defense or repelling unlawful attacks from their own property. This raises a question whether it is justified to apply criminal legislation regulations related to self-defense in this case, or is the priority given to police regulations related to use of force? ., Tema ovog rada je nesumnjivo jedan od najvažnijih instituta krivičnog prava. Na značaj nužne odbrane u savremenim zakonodavstvima, teoriji i sudskoj praksi ukazuje svrha primene ovog instituta i dejstvo u odnosu na učinioca krivičnog dela. Dobro je poznato da se nužnom odbranom štiti pravo od neprava, tj. štite pravna dobra napadnutog lica od protivpravnog napada. Naša istraživanja sudske prakse su pokazala da se najčešće može govoriti o zaštiti najznačajnijih dobara svakog čoveka: života, telesnog integriteta i imovine. Štaviše, preduzimanjem protivpravnog napada narušava se pravni poredak, dok primena nužne odbrane doprinosi njegovom ponovnom uspostavljanju. Ali, da li je zakonodavac želeo da obezbedi zaštitu isključivo napadnutom i pravnom poretku, zanemarujući interese napadača? Zanimljivo je da se danas u Nemačkoj vode rasprave da li se krivično delo iznuđivanje iskaza od strane službenog lica može opravdati nužnom odbranom drugoga, uprkos zabrani torture u postupcima pred državnim organima koja je sadržana u krivično-pravnim propisima, Ustavu, normama policijskog prava i međunarodnim konvencijama. Poznato je da su policijski službenici, zbog prirode profesije koju obavljaju, često u prilici da pružaju nužnu pomoć ili odbijaju protivpravni napad od svog dobra. Nameće se pitanje, da li je opravdano u tom slučaju primeniti propise krivičnog zakonodavstva koji regulišu nužnu odbranu, ili prednost imaju odredbe policijskog prava koje se odnose na upotrebu sredstava prinude? .",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Necessary defense and rights and duties of police officers, Nužna odbrana i prava i dužnosti policijskih službenika",
volume = "51",
number = "1-2",
pages = "386-398",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_259"
}

Risimović, R.. (2009). Necessary defense and rights and duties of police officers. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 51(1-2), 386-398.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_259

Risimović R. Necessary defense and rights and duties of police officers. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2009;51(1-2):386-398.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_259 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Necessary defense and rights and duties of police officers" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 51, no. 1-2 (2009):386-398,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_259 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/236
AB  - As we have already explained, the author is trying to contribute to solving one of the most complicated problems related to criminal law, differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence. It is evident that for this purpose we cannot use the element of conscious as a criterion, because the legislator issues determined level of conscious when it comes to both forms of guilt in the same way ('when the perpetrator was conscious of his power to perform an action'). From the perspective of theory, Franco's formula represents an ideal mechanism for differentiating the forms of guilt, but as we have shown, in practice it is very hard to determine that the perpetrator agreed to consequence of criminal act. In spite of objections, Franco's formula is generally accepted in the contemporary criminal law theory. Therefore, our only task is to respond the crucial question - how to determine what would have been reaction of the perpetrator if he had known that the consequence will come forth for sure. We think that the perpetrator's statement should be taken into consideration, but also that objective circumstances of the case in question, which point out the perpetrator's intention to perform an action, that is, to abstain himself, should have crucial importance. Nevertheless, Franco's formula cannot be applied when it comes to criminal act of endangering public transportation. In practice, it is very difficult to imagine the situation in which the perpetrator would have performed an action of violating traffic regulations if he hadn't known that the consequences and concrete dangers for the people or properties would appear. When it comes to differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence in public transportation, criminal law literature and legal practice offer so called inconsideration, that is, the circumstance in which the perpetrator violated more than one traffic regulation. We think that inconsideration should be used only as additional means for differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence. The reason is that the concept of inconsideration is not determined. Also, some specific situations in traffic show that inconsiderate violation of traffic regulations does not necessarily mean accepting of the consequence of the criminal act of endangering the public transportation.
AB  - Autor rada je pokušao da doprinese rešavanju jednog od najsloženijih problema krivičnog prava, razgraničenju eventualnog umišljaja od svesnog nehata. Problem je utoliko veći jer je intelektualni element oblika krivice koji se razmatraju identičan i nije pogodan da posluži kao kriterijujm razlikovanja. U uvodnom delu ukazano je na značaj razlikovanja eventualnog umišljaja i svesnog nehata, odnosno pojmovno je određen umišljaj (direktni i eventualni). U drugom delu rada kritički smo sagledali Frankovu formulu, koja je u krivičnopravnoj literaturi opšteprihvaćena u pogledu određenja 'pristajanja na posledicu' kod eventualnog umišljaja. Treći deo rada sadrži predloge teorije krivičnog prava o mogućnostima razgraničenja navedenih oblika krivice. Na kraju, autor daje sopstveno viđenje mogućnosti rešavanja ovog problema.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence
T1  - Razgraničenje eventualnog umišljaja i svesnog nehata
VL  - 13
IS  - 3
SP  - 89
EP  - 103
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_236
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2008",
abstract = "As we have already explained, the author is trying to contribute to solving one of the most complicated problems related to criminal law, differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence. It is evident that for this purpose we cannot use the element of conscious as a criterion, because the legislator issues determined level of conscious when it comes to both forms of guilt in the same way ('when the perpetrator was conscious of his power to perform an action'). From the perspective of theory, Franco's formula represents an ideal mechanism for differentiating the forms of guilt, but as we have shown, in practice it is very hard to determine that the perpetrator agreed to consequence of criminal act. In spite of objections, Franco's formula is generally accepted in the contemporary criminal law theory. Therefore, our only task is to respond the crucial question - how to determine what would have been reaction of the perpetrator if he had known that the consequence will come forth for sure. We think that the perpetrator's statement should be taken into consideration, but also that objective circumstances of the case in question, which point out the perpetrator's intention to perform an action, that is, to abstain himself, should have crucial importance. Nevertheless, Franco's formula cannot be applied when it comes to criminal act of endangering public transportation. In practice, it is very difficult to imagine the situation in which the perpetrator would have performed an action of violating traffic regulations if he hadn't known that the consequences and concrete dangers for the people or properties would appear. When it comes to differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence in public transportation, criminal law literature and legal practice offer so called inconsideration, that is, the circumstance in which the perpetrator violated more than one traffic regulation. We think that inconsideration should be used only as additional means for differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence. The reason is that the concept of inconsideration is not determined. Also, some specific situations in traffic show that inconsiderate violation of traffic regulations does not necessarily mean accepting of the consequence of the criminal act of endangering the public transportation., Autor rada je pokušao da doprinese rešavanju jednog od najsloženijih problema krivičnog prava, razgraničenju eventualnog umišljaja od svesnog nehata. Problem je utoliko veći jer je intelektualni element oblika krivice koji se razmatraju identičan i nije pogodan da posluži kao kriterijujm razlikovanja. U uvodnom delu ukazano je na značaj razlikovanja eventualnog umišljaja i svesnog nehata, odnosno pojmovno je određen umišljaj (direktni i eventualni). U drugom delu rada kritički smo sagledali Frankovu formulu, koja je u krivičnopravnoj literaturi opšteprihvaćena u pogledu određenja 'pristajanja na posledicu' kod eventualnog umišljaja. Treći deo rada sadrži predloge teorije krivičnog prava o mogućnostima razgraničenja navedenih oblika krivice. Na kraju, autor daje sopstveno viđenje mogućnosti rešavanja ovog problema.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence, Razgraničenje eventualnog umišljaja i svesnog nehata",
volume = "13",
number = "3",
pages = "89-103",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_236"
}

Risimović, R.. (2008). Differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 13(3), 89-103.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_236

Risimović R. Differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2008;13(3):89-103.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_236 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Differentiating dolus eventualis from conscious negligence" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 13, no. 3 (2008):89-103,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_236 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/235
AB  - The subject of this paper is one of the most important criminal law institutes. The purpose of this institute together with its effect on perpetrator of a crime points out the significance of self-defense within contemporary legislation. It is well known that self-defense protects the law against non-law, that is, protects legal property of the attacked person against unlawful attack. Although our legal practice researches showed that generally we can speak of protection of the most important properties of every human: life, physical integrity, and property. Moreover, unlawful attack violates legal system, while the use of self-defense contributes to its reestablishing. But, did the legislator want to provide protection exclusively to the attacked person or legal system, without taking into account the interest of the perpetrator? Italian criminal legislation belongs to the group of countries that classify self-defense as reasons which exclude punishment, while the criminal law literature in this country accepts so called dualistic conception of self-defense.
AB  - Tema ovog rada je nesumnjivo jedan od najvažnijih instituta krivičnog prava. Na značaj nužne odbrane u savremenim zakonodavstvima, teoriji i sudskoj praksi ukazuje svrha primene ovog instituta i dejstvo u odnosu na učinioca krivičnog dela. Dobro je poznato da se nužnom odbranom štiti pravo od neprava, tj. štite pravna dobra napadnutog lica od protivpravnog napada. Naša istraživanja sudske prakse su pokazala da se najčešće može govoriti o zaštiti najznačajnijih dobara svakog čoveka: života, telesnog integriteta i imovine. Štaviše, preduzimanjem protivpravnog napada narušava se pravni poredak, dok primena nužne odbrane doprinosi njegovom ponovnom uspostavljanju. Ali, da li je zakonodavac želeo da obezbedi zaštitu isključivo napadnutom i pravnom poretku, zanemarujući interese napadača? Italijansko krivično zakonodavstvo pripada grupi zemalja koje nužnu odbranu svrstavaju u osnove koji isključuju kažnjivost, dok krivičnopravna literatura u ovoj zemlji prihvata tzv. dualističko shvatanje nužne odbrane.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Self-defense in criminal law of Italy
T1  - Nužna odbrana u krivičnom pravu Italije
VL  - 46
IS  - 3
SP  - 97
EP  - 112
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_235
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2008",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is one of the most important criminal law institutes. The purpose of this institute together with its effect on perpetrator of a crime points out the significance of self-defense within contemporary legislation. It is well known that self-defense protects the law against non-law, that is, protects legal property of the attacked person against unlawful attack. Although our legal practice researches showed that generally we can speak of protection of the most important properties of every human: life, physical integrity, and property. Moreover, unlawful attack violates legal system, while the use of self-defense contributes to its reestablishing. But, did the legislator want to provide protection exclusively to the attacked person or legal system, without taking into account the interest of the perpetrator? Italian criminal legislation belongs to the group of countries that classify self-defense as reasons which exclude punishment, while the criminal law literature in this country accepts so called dualistic conception of self-defense., Tema ovog rada je nesumnjivo jedan od najvažnijih instituta krivičnog prava. Na značaj nužne odbrane u savremenim zakonodavstvima, teoriji i sudskoj praksi ukazuje svrha primene ovog instituta i dejstvo u odnosu na učinioca krivičnog dela. Dobro je poznato da se nužnom odbranom štiti pravo od neprava, tj. štite pravna dobra napadnutog lica od protivpravnog napada. Naša istraživanja sudske prakse su pokazala da se najčešće može govoriti o zaštiti najznačajnijih dobara svakog čoveka: života, telesnog integriteta i imovine. Štaviše, preduzimanjem protivpravnog napada narušava se pravni poredak, dok primena nužne odbrane doprinosi njegovom ponovnom uspostavljanju. Ali, da li je zakonodavac želeo da obezbedi zaštitu isključivo napadnutom i pravnom poretku, zanemarujući interese napadača? Italijansko krivično zakonodavstvo pripada grupi zemalja koje nužnu odbranu svrstavaju u osnove koji isključuju kažnjivost, dok krivičnopravna literatura u ovoj zemlji prihvata tzv. dualističko shvatanje nužne odbrane.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Self-defense in criminal law of Italy, Nužna odbrana u krivičnom pravu Italije",
volume = "46",
number = "3",
pages = "97-112",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_235"
}

Risimović, R.. (2008). Self-defense in criminal law of Italy. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 46(3), 97-112.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_235

Risimović R. Self-defense in criminal law of Italy. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2008;46(3):97-112.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_235 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Self-defense in criminal law of Italy" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 46, no. 3 (2008):97-112,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_235 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/227
AB  - Spanish criminal legislation belongs to the group of countries that classify self-defense as reasons which exclude criminal liability, while the criminal law literature in this country accepts so called dualistic conception of self-defense, although there is no unique attitude on the legal nature of this institute. It is very interesting that the legal practice, in spite of basic theory conception that any legal property can represent the object of attack, in a number of cases is rejecting the possibility for perpetrator to cite self-defense for violation of honor. There is a governing attitude that it is not relevant for the existence of attack as a condition for applying the Article 20. p. 4 of the Criminal Code of Spain the circumstance whether the action of the aggressor has been executed with the guilt. When it comes to unlawfulness of the attack, some authors support the attitude that very individual criminal unlawfulness of the aggressor's action can be discussed. Big part of the work was devoted to provoked defense, that is, 'absence of enough provocation by the victim'. Related to condition of simultaneousness of attack and defense, we did not accept the conception according to which in some cases it is acceptable to violate or endanger legal properties of the aggressor after termination of the attack. Further, the condition of defense necessity depends in big part on establishing 'the necessity of rational use of means for the effect of preventing or rejecting the attack' (Article 20. p. 4 of the Criminal Code of Spain). At the end, although legislator in Spain does not explicitly require so called defense mood as a condition for excluding criminal liability, there is a unique conception of both theory and practice on necessity of existence of the self-defense subjective element.
AB  - Špansko krivično zakonodavstvo pripada grupi zemalja koje nužnu odbranu svrstavaju u osnove koji isključuju krivičnu odgovornost, dok krivičnopravna literatura u ovoj zemlji prihvata tzv. dualističko shvatanje nužne odbrane, iako o pravnoj prirodi ovog instituta ne postoji jedinstveno mišljenje. Interesantno je da sudska praksa uprkos načelnom stanovištu teorije da svako pravno dobro može biti objekt napada, u velikom broju slučajeva odbacuje mogućnost da se zbog povrede časti učinilac pozove na nužnu odbranu. Preovladava mišljenje, prema kome za postojanje napada kao uslova za primenu člana 20. stav 4 Krivičnog zakonika Španije, nema značaja okolnost da li je radnja napadača preduzeta sa krivicom. U pogledu protivpravnosti napada, pojedini autori zastupaju stav da se može govoriti o posebnoj krivičnoj protivpravnosti radnje koju preduzima napadač. Veliki deo rada posvećen je isprovociranoj odbrani, tj. 'izostanku dovoljne provokacije od strane napadnutog'. U vezi sa uslovom istovremenosti napada i odbrane, nismo prihvatili stanovište prema kome je u pojedinim slučajevima dozvoljeno povrediti ili ugroziti pravna dobra napadača posle okončanja napada. Dalje, uslov neophodnosti odbrane u velikoj meri zavisi od utvrđivanja 'neophodnosti racionalne upotrebe sredstava radi sprečavanja ili odbijanja napada' (član 20. stav 4 Krivičnog zakonika Španije). Na kraju, iako zakonodavac u Španiji ne zahteva izričito tzv. odbrambenu volju kao uslov za isključenje krivične odgovornosti, jedinstveno je mišljenje teorije i prakse o neophodnosti postojanja subjektivnog elementa nužne odbrane.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Self-defense in criminal law of Spain
T1  - Nužna odbrana u krivičnom zakonodavstvu Španije
IS  - 3
SP  - 222
EP  - 261
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_227
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Spanish criminal legislation belongs to the group of countries that classify self-defense as reasons which exclude criminal liability, while the criminal law literature in this country accepts so called dualistic conception of self-defense, although there is no unique attitude on the legal nature of this institute. It is very interesting that the legal practice, in spite of basic theory conception that any legal property can represent the object of attack, in a number of cases is rejecting the possibility for perpetrator to cite self-defense for violation of honor. There is a governing attitude that it is not relevant for the existence of attack as a condition for applying the Article 20. p. 4 of the Criminal Code of Spain the circumstance whether the action of the aggressor has been executed with the guilt. When it comes to unlawfulness of the attack, some authors support the attitude that very individual criminal unlawfulness of the aggressor's action can be discussed. Big part of the work was devoted to provoked defense, that is, 'absence of enough provocation by the victim'. Related to condition of simultaneousness of attack and defense, we did not accept the conception according to which in some cases it is acceptable to violate or endanger legal properties of the aggressor after termination of the attack. Further, the condition of defense necessity depends in big part on establishing 'the necessity of rational use of means for the effect of preventing or rejecting the attack' (Article 20. p. 4 of the Criminal Code of Spain). At the end, although legislator in Spain does not explicitly require so called defense mood as a condition for excluding criminal liability, there is a unique conception of both theory and practice on necessity of existence of the self-defense subjective element., Špansko krivično zakonodavstvo pripada grupi zemalja koje nužnu odbranu svrstavaju u osnove koji isključuju krivičnu odgovornost, dok krivičnopravna literatura u ovoj zemlji prihvata tzv. dualističko shvatanje nužne odbrane, iako o pravnoj prirodi ovog instituta ne postoji jedinstveno mišljenje. Interesantno je da sudska praksa uprkos načelnom stanovištu teorije da svako pravno dobro može biti objekt napada, u velikom broju slučajeva odbacuje mogućnost da se zbog povrede časti učinilac pozove na nužnu odbranu. Preovladava mišljenje, prema kome za postojanje napada kao uslova za primenu člana 20. stav 4 Krivičnog zakonika Španije, nema značaja okolnost da li je radnja napadača preduzeta sa krivicom. U pogledu protivpravnosti napada, pojedini autori zastupaju stav da se može govoriti o posebnoj krivičnoj protivpravnosti radnje koju preduzima napadač. Veliki deo rada posvećen je isprovociranoj odbrani, tj. 'izostanku dovoljne provokacije od strane napadnutog'. U vezi sa uslovom istovremenosti napada i odbrane, nismo prihvatili stanovište prema kome je u pojedinim slučajevima dozvoljeno povrediti ili ugroziti pravna dobra napadača posle okončanja napada. Dalje, uslov neophodnosti odbrane u velikoj meri zavisi od utvrđivanja 'neophodnosti racionalne upotrebe sredstava radi sprečavanja ili odbijanja napada' (član 20. stav 4 Krivičnog zakonika Španije). Na kraju, iako zakonodavac u Španiji ne zahteva izričito tzv. odbrambenu volju kao uslov za isključenje krivične odgovornosti, jedinstveno je mišljenje teorije i prakse o neophodnosti postojanja subjektivnog elementa nužne odbrane.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Self-defense in criminal law of Spain, Nužna odbrana u krivičnom zakonodavstvu Španije",
number = "3",
pages = "222-261",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_227"
}

Risimović, R.. (2008). Self-defense in criminal law of Spain. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(3), 222-261.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_227

Risimović R. Self-defense in criminal law of Spain. in Strani pravni život. 2008;(3):222-261.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_227 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Self-defense in criminal law of Spain" in Strani pravni život, no. 3 (2008):222-261,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_227 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/198
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Violent behaviour
T1  - Nasilničko ponašanje
VL  - 57
IS  - 9
SP  - 235
EP  - 247
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_198
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2008",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Violent behaviour, Nasilničko ponašanje",
volume = "57",
number = "9",
pages = "235-247",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_198"
}

Risimović, R.. (2008). Violent behaviour. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 57(9), 235-247.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_198

Risimović R. Violent behaviour. in Pravni život. 2008;57(9):235-247.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_198 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Violent behaviour" in Pravni život, 57, no. 9 (2008):235-247,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_198 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/179
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Limits of self-defense and the right to life
T1  - Granice nužne odbrane i pravo na život
VL  - 56
IS  - 9
SP  - 165
EP  - 179
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_179
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2007",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Limits of self-defense and the right to life, Granice nužne odbrane i pravo na život",
volume = "56",
number = "9",
pages = "165-179",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_179"
}

Risimović, R.. (2007). Limits of self-defense and the right to life. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 56(9), 165-179.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_179

Risimović R. Limits of self-defense and the right to life. in Pravni život. 2007;56(9):165-179.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_179 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Limits of self-defense and the right to life" in Pravni život, 56, no. 9 (2007):165-179,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_179 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/168
AB  - Because of the nature of public traffic, which is generally a dangerous activity, some theoreticians have, at first sight, logical opinion that direct intention is not possible as a degree of guilt in criminal offence of endangering public traffic. However, it is our opinion that participants in traffic, as a rule, desire not to injure a person’s body or cause damage to property, but desire concrete danger as a consequence of this criminal act. Otherwise, criminal offence of the Article 289 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia won’t be committed, but some other criminal offence against life and body (for example, manslaughter). Since the intellectual element of guilt, in the cases of eventual premeditation and conscious negligence, is the same, and since the Frank’s formula could not be used for establishing the consent to consequence of traffic offence, the question remains how to distinguish premeditation from negligence. We believe that solving of this issue doesn’t require creating a special form of guilt as recommend certain authors, but that it can be done by using the existing provisions of the Criminal Code (Articles 25 and 26 of the Criminal Code) i.e. using auxiliary criteria for distinguishing eventual premeditation from conscience negligence. At the end of the paper, we have pointed out that in the case where several people were included in traffic accident, the guilt of one doesn’t exclude the guilt of the others, which means that the form of guilt has to be established for each of them separately. Exclusion from the rule is the traffic situation in which the perpetrator, by violating the traffic regulations, contributes to concrete danger, but his action is not the direct cause of the traffic accident.
AB  - Ovaj rad je pokušaj da se doprinese rešavanju jednog od najsloženijih problema krivičnog prava, razgraničenju pojedinih oblika krivice kod saobraćajne delikvencije. Naime, zbog prirode javnog saobraćaja pojedini autori u krivično-pravnoj literaturi zauzeli su stav da direktan umišljaj i nesvesni nehat uopšte nisu mogući oblici krivice kod učinioca krivičnog dela ugrožavanje javnog saobraćaja. U pogledu ove nedoumice u izlaganjima koja slede zauzet je nedvosmislen stav. Takođe, obzirom na jedinstveno mišljenje u teoriji krivičnog prava da se Frankova formula kao model rešavanja razlikovanja eventualnog umišljaja i svesnog nehata ne može primeniti kod saobraćajne delikvencije, u radu su utvrđeni pomoćni kriterijumi na osnovu kojih je, ipak, moguće rešiti ovaj problem. Na kraju, analizirali smo sporna pitanja koja se odnose na tzv. sticaj nehata u javnom saobraćaju).
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Establishing guilt in criminal offence of endangering road traffic
T1  - Utvrđivanje krivice kod krivičnog dela ugrožavanje javnog saobraćaja
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
SP  - 83
EP  - 96
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_168
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2007",
abstract = "Because of the nature of public traffic, which is generally a dangerous activity, some theoreticians have, at first sight, logical opinion that direct intention is not possible as a degree of guilt in criminal offence of endangering public traffic. However, it is our opinion that participants in traffic, as a rule, desire not to injure a person’s body or cause damage to property, but desire concrete danger as a consequence of this criminal act. Otherwise, criminal offence of the Article 289 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia won’t be committed, but some other criminal offence against life and body (for example, manslaughter). Since the intellectual element of guilt, in the cases of eventual premeditation and conscious negligence, is the same, and since the Frank’s formula could not be used for establishing the consent to consequence of traffic offence, the question remains how to distinguish premeditation from negligence. We believe that solving of this issue doesn’t require creating a special form of guilt as recommend certain authors, but that it can be done by using the existing provisions of the Criminal Code (Articles 25 and 26 of the Criminal Code) i.e. using auxiliary criteria for distinguishing eventual premeditation from conscience negligence. At the end of the paper, we have pointed out that in the case where several people were included in traffic accident, the guilt of one doesn’t exclude the guilt of the others, which means that the form of guilt has to be established for each of them separately. Exclusion from the rule is the traffic situation in which the perpetrator, by violating the traffic regulations, contributes to concrete danger, but his action is not the direct cause of the traffic accident., Ovaj rad je pokušaj da se doprinese rešavanju jednog od najsloženijih problema krivičnog prava, razgraničenju pojedinih oblika krivice kod saobraćajne delikvencije. Naime, zbog prirode javnog saobraćaja pojedini autori u krivično-pravnoj literaturi zauzeli su stav da direktan umišljaj i nesvesni nehat uopšte nisu mogući oblici krivice kod učinioca krivičnog dela ugrožavanje javnog saobraćaja. U pogledu ove nedoumice u izlaganjima koja slede zauzet je nedvosmislen stav. Takođe, obzirom na jedinstveno mišljenje u teoriji krivičnog prava da se Frankova formula kao model rešavanja razlikovanja eventualnog umišljaja i svesnog nehata ne može primeniti kod saobraćajne delikvencije, u radu su utvrđeni pomoćni kriterijumi na osnovu kojih je, ipak, moguće rešiti ovaj problem. Na kraju, analizirali smo sporna pitanja koja se odnose na tzv. sticaj nehata u javnom saobraćaju).",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Establishing guilt in criminal offence of endangering road traffic, Utvrđivanje krivice kod krivičnog dela ugrožavanje javnog saobraćaja",
volume = "12",
number = "2",
pages = "83-96",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_168"
}

Risimović, R.. (2007). Establishing guilt in criminal offence of endangering road traffic. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 12(2), 83-96.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_168

Risimović R. Establishing guilt in criminal offence of endangering road traffic. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2007;12(2):83-96.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_168 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Establishing guilt in criminal offence of endangering road traffic" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 12, no. 2 (2007):83-96,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_168 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/129
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Right to life and exceptional circumstances
T1  - Pravo na život i krajnja nužda
VL  - 55
IS  - 9
SP  - 217
EP  - 228
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_129
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2006",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Right to life and exceptional circumstances, Pravo na život i krajnja nužda",
volume = "55",
number = "9",
pages = "217-228",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_129"
}

Risimović, R.. (2006). Right to life and exceptional circumstances. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 55(9), 217-228.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_129

Risimović R. Right to life and exceptional circumstances. in Pravni život. 2006;55(9):217-228.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_129 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Right to life and exceptional circumstances" in Pravni život, 55, no. 9 (2006):217-228,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_129 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2005
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/108
AB  - Theoretical and practical defining of spheres of criminal offences and violations belongs to outstanding issues of criminal law and law of torts. Various notions in criminal legal and violation-related legal theory regarding this problem occur as so-called qualitative and quantitative differentiation of criminal offences and violations. According to the notion of qualitative difference between criminal offences and violations there is an essential difference between two kinds of punishable acts that can be noted by comparing general elements of the notion of criminal act with the elements of general notion of violation. For instance, the main element in the notion of criminal offence is an act committed by a physical person. On the other hand, violation is an act that can be committed by both physical and legal person. Furthermore, criminal offence is an act that must be prescribed by the law before it has been committed. However, violations in our legislation are prescribed by the law, by various regulations and decisions of the assemblies of autonomous regions, municipalities, the city of Belgrade and town assemblies. Finally, as distinguished from criminal offence, culpability is not an element of the general notion of a violation. Namely, violation-related law demands culpability as a condition of penal system, but only if the violation has been committed by a physical person (or responsible person or entrepreneur). Legal persons as perpetrators of violations cannot have conscience and will, in other words they cannot have a psychological relation towards an act - culpability. The complexity of the problem of defining the sphere of criminal offences from the sphere of violations in practice is shown by comparison of legal description of criminal offence of jeopardizing public traffic (acts, consequences, places of commitment, violation subject) with the characteristics of corpus delicti of relevant violations against the traffic safety. The analysis of traffic delinquency shows that there can be some overlapping of characteristics of corpus delicti of criminal offences and violations, which made the legislator prescribe the objective condition of incrimination as a condition for the existence of criminal offence of jeopardizing public traffic (Art. 195 of Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia), in other words light bodily injury or property damage exceeding the value of 120.000 dinars.
AB  - Rad se bavi razgraničenjem krivičnih dela od prekršaja, i to sa aspekta poređenja opštih elemenata u pojmu krivičnog dela sa elementima u opštem pojmu prekršaja. Sa druge strane, na primeru saobraćajne delinkvencije ukazuje se na složenost odnosa između saobraćajnih krivičnih dela i saobraćajnih prekršaja, njihovu međusobnu isprepletanost, sličnost u pogledu obeležja bića krivičnih dela i prekršaja u javnom saobraćaju, ali i način za njihovo pouzdano razgraničenje.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Defining the spheres of criminal offences and violations in the area of road traffic offences
T1  - Razgraničenje krivičnih dela i prekršaja kod saobraćajnih delikata
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
SP  - 103
EP  - 116
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_108
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2005",
abstract = "Theoretical and practical defining of spheres of criminal offences and violations belongs to outstanding issues of criminal law and law of torts. Various notions in criminal legal and violation-related legal theory regarding this problem occur as so-called qualitative and quantitative differentiation of criminal offences and violations. According to the notion of qualitative difference between criminal offences and violations there is an essential difference between two kinds of punishable acts that can be noted by comparing general elements of the notion of criminal act with the elements of general notion of violation. For instance, the main element in the notion of criminal offence is an act committed by a physical person. On the other hand, violation is an act that can be committed by both physical and legal person. Furthermore, criminal offence is an act that must be prescribed by the law before it has been committed. However, violations in our legislation are prescribed by the law, by various regulations and decisions of the assemblies of autonomous regions, municipalities, the city of Belgrade and town assemblies. Finally, as distinguished from criminal offence, culpability is not an element of the general notion of a violation. Namely, violation-related law demands culpability as a condition of penal system, but only if the violation has been committed by a physical person (or responsible person or entrepreneur). Legal persons as perpetrators of violations cannot have conscience and will, in other words they cannot have a psychological relation towards an act - culpability. The complexity of the problem of defining the sphere of criminal offences from the sphere of violations in practice is shown by comparison of legal description of criminal offence of jeopardizing public traffic (acts, consequences, places of commitment, violation subject) with the characteristics of corpus delicti of relevant violations against the traffic safety. The analysis of traffic delinquency shows that there can be some overlapping of characteristics of corpus delicti of criminal offences and violations, which made the legislator prescribe the objective condition of incrimination as a condition for the existence of criminal offence of jeopardizing public traffic (Art. 195 of Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia), in other words light bodily injury or property damage exceeding the value of 120.000 dinars., Rad se bavi razgraničenjem krivičnih dela od prekršaja, i to sa aspekta poređenja opštih elemenata u pojmu krivičnog dela sa elementima u opštem pojmu prekršaja. Sa druge strane, na primeru saobraćajne delinkvencije ukazuje se na složenost odnosa između saobraćajnih krivičnih dela i saobraćajnih prekršaja, njihovu međusobnu isprepletanost, sličnost u pogledu obeležja bića krivičnih dela i prekršaja u javnom saobraćaju, ali i način za njihovo pouzdano razgraničenje.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Defining the spheres of criminal offences and violations in the area of road traffic offences, Razgraničenje krivičnih dela i prekršaja kod saobraćajnih delikata",
volume = "10",
number = "2",
pages = "103-116",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_108"
}

Risimović, R.. (2005). Defining the spheres of criminal offences and violations in the area of road traffic offences. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 10(2), 103-116.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_108

Risimović R. Defining the spheres of criminal offences and violations in the area of road traffic offences. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2005;10(2):103-116.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_108 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Defining the spheres of criminal offences and violations in the area of road traffic offences" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 10, no. 2 (2005):103-116,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_108 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2005
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/88
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Right to life in public transport
T1  - Zaštita prava na život u javnom saobraćaju
VL  - 54
IS  - 9
SP  - 263
EP  - 275
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_88
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2005",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Right to life in public transport, Zaštita prava na život u javnom saobraćaju",
volume = "54",
number = "9",
pages = "263-275",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_88"
}

Risimović, R.. (2005). Right to life in public transport. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 54(9), 263-275.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_88

Risimović R. Right to life in public transport. in Pravni život. 2005;54(9):263-275.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_88 .

Risimović, Radosav, "Right to life in public transport" in Pravni život, 54, no. 9 (2005):263-275,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_88 .