TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
AU  - Bodrožić, Ivana
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://nbp.kpu.edu.rs/all-issues/#1614326566164-36487937-5a04
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1309
AB  - From  the  adoption  of  the  Criminal  Code  in  2006  until  the  latest  amendments  of  2019,  the  Serbian  criminal  legislation  treated  recidivism  as  an  optional  aggravating  circumstance,  which  had  its  specific  legal  status  in  comparison with other mitigating and aggravating circumstances. According to the new legal solution, instead of being optional, recidivism has become a mandatory  aggravating  circumstance.  Together  with  clearly  specified  condi-tions  for  harsher  penalties  this  narrows  down  the  possibility  of  free  judicial  decision-making  when  meting  out  punishment.  The  paper  answers  several  questions: whether harsher penalties for recidivists are only the result of con-tinuous tightening of repression at a normative level, whether and to what ex-tent  the  criminal-law  framework  has  been  improved,  and  whether  returning  to some solutions, which were not normally applied in court practice, can be marked as approriate to achieve the desired degree of crime prevention. Final critical conculusion is that the new legal solution on recidivism appears regres-sive, given that the court is strictly bound by the law through oblitatory condi-tions regarding prior and persistent offending, which is in compliance with the general trend of tightening repression at the normative level and reducing the role of the court to the level of administrative application of the norm.
PB  - Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
T2  - NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - A new legal solution on recidivism in Serbian Criminal legislation
VL  - 25
IS  - 3
SP  - 71
EP  - 85
DO  - 10.5937/nabepo25-30459
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe and Bodrožić, Ivana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "From  the  adoption  of  the  Criminal  Code  in  2006  until  the  latest  amendments  of  2019,  the  Serbian  criminal  legislation  treated  recidivism  as  an  optional  aggravating  circumstance,  which  had  its  specific  legal  status  in  comparison with other mitigating and aggravating circumstances. According to the new legal solution, instead of being optional, recidivism has become a mandatory  aggravating  circumstance.  Together  with  clearly  specified  condi-tions  for  harsher  penalties  this  narrows  down  the  possibility  of  free  judicial  decision-making  when  meting  out  punishment.  The  paper  answers  several  questions: whether harsher penalties for recidivists are only the result of con-tinuous tightening of repression at a normative level, whether and to what ex-tent  the  criminal-law  framework  has  been  improved,  and  whether  returning  to some solutions, which were not normally applied in court practice, can be marked as approriate to achieve the desired degree of crime prevention. Final critical conculusion is that the new legal solution on recidivism appears regres-sive, given that the court is strictly bound by the law through oblitatory condi-tions regarding prior and persistent offending, which is in compliance with the general trend of tightening repression at the normative level and reducing the role of the court to the level of administrative application of the norm.",
publisher = "Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies",
journal = "NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "A new legal solution on recidivism in Serbian Criminal legislation",
volume = "25",
number = "3",
pages = "71-85",
doi = "10.5937/nabepo25-30459"
}

Đorđević, Đ.,& Bodrožić, I.. (2020). A new legal solution on recidivism in Serbian Criminal legislation. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
Belgrade : University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies., 25(3), 71-85.
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-30459

Đorđević Đ, Bodrožić I. A new legal solution on recidivism in Serbian Criminal legislation. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2020;25(3):71-85.
doi:10.5937/nabepo25-30459 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, Bodrožić, Ivana, "A new legal solution on recidivism in Serbian Criminal legislation" in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija : Journal of criminalistics and law = žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 25, no. 3 (2020):71-85,
https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-30459 . .

Ђорђевић, Ђ.,& Коларић, Д.. (2020). Кривично право : посебни део. 
Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијски универзитет..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1625

Ђорђевић Ђ, Коларић Д. Кривично право : посебни део. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1625 .

Ђорђевић, Ђорђе, Коларић, Драгана, "Кривично право : посебни део" (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1625 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1724
AB  - The fine is one of the most commonly applied criminal sanctions in contemporary criminal law. However, 
although it is very suitable as a replacement for short-term prison sentences and in many cases good alternative
for a suspended sentence, it is rarely applied in the practice of our courts. One of the main reasons for this
appears to be the problem with the application of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code (determining
and imposing fines) that provide two parallel systems: the system of fines in daily amounts and the system of
fines in a particular amount. Problems with the application of the first system, which should be primary, along
with insufficiently coordinated parallel solutions, have led to its rare use and even more to general decline of
pronouncing fine in practice. Therefore, it would be good to opt for one of the two systems when next changes
in the Criminal Code take place. If this happens to be a system of fines in daily amounts, it would be necessary
to make significant changes in its implementation, especially towards giving greater power to the courts to
assess the income and expenses of the offender, as well as easier determination of the amount of the day.
AB  - Novčana kazna je jedna od najviše primenjivanih krivičnih sankcija u savremenom krivičnom pravu.
Međutim, iako veoma pogodna kao zamena za kratkotrajne kazne zatvora i u mnogim slučajevima dobra
alteranativa za uslovnu osudu, ona se u praksi naših sudova sve ređe primenjuje. Kao jedan od osnovnih
razloga njene smanjene primene pojavljuju se problemi vezani za odredbe Krivičnog zakonika o
odmeravanju i izricanju novčane kazne kojima je propisano paralelno postojanje dva sistema: sistema
novčane kazne u dnevnim iznosima i sistema novčane kazne u određenom iznosu. Problemi oko primene
prvog sistema, koji bi trebalo da bude osnovni, i međusobna neusklađenost dva sistema doveli su do toga
da se prvi sistem gotovo i ne primenjuje, a da novčana kazna u celini beleži stalni pad u učestalosti izricanja.
Stoga bi bilo dobro prilikom sledećih izmena u Krivičnom zakoniku opredeliti se za jedan od ova dva
sistema. Ukoliko bi to bio sistem novčane kazne u dnevnim iznosima, bilo bi neophodno učiniti značajne
izmene u načinu njegove primene koje bi bile u funkciji davanja širih ovlašćenja sudu u proceni prihoda i
rashoda učinioca i olakšanja utvrđivanja vrednosti dnevnih iznosa.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja = Institute of criminological and sociological research
C3  - Krivične i prekršajne sankcije i mere : izricanje, izvršenje i uslovni otpust : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : Palić, 2-3. jun 2016. = Criminal and Misdemeanor Sanctions and Measures : Imposing, Enforcement and Conditional Release : Thematic conference proceedings of international significance : Palic, 2-3 june 2016.
T1  - Problemi propisivanja i odmeravanje novčane kazne u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu
T1  - Problems of prescription and determination of fine in our criminal legislation
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1724
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Kolarić, Dragana and Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The fine is one of the most commonly applied criminal sanctions in contemporary criminal law. However, 
although it is very suitable as a replacement for short-term prison sentences and in many cases good alternative
for a suspended sentence, it is rarely applied in the practice of our courts. One of the main reasons for this
appears to be the problem with the application of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code (determining
and imposing fines) that provide two parallel systems: the system of fines in daily amounts and the system of
fines in a particular amount. Problems with the application of the first system, which should be primary, along
with insufficiently coordinated parallel solutions, have led to its rare use and even more to general decline of
pronouncing fine in practice. Therefore, it would be good to opt for one of the two systems when next changes
in the Criminal Code take place. If this happens to be a system of fines in daily amounts, it would be necessary
to make significant changes in its implementation, especially towards giving greater power to the courts to
assess the income and expenses of the offender, as well as easier determination of the amount of the day., Novčana kazna je jedna od najviše primenjivanih krivičnih sankcija u savremenom krivičnom pravu.
Međutim, iako veoma pogodna kao zamena za kratkotrajne kazne zatvora i u mnogim slučajevima dobra
alteranativa za uslovnu osudu, ona se u praksi naših sudova sve ređe primenjuje. Kao jedan od osnovnih
razloga njene smanjene primene pojavljuju se problemi vezani za odredbe Krivičnog zakonika o
odmeravanju i izricanju novčane kazne kojima je propisano paralelno postojanje dva sistema: sistema
novčane kazne u dnevnim iznosima i sistema novčane kazne u određenom iznosu. Problemi oko primene
prvog sistema, koji bi trebalo da bude osnovni, i međusobna neusklađenost dva sistema doveli su do toga
da se prvi sistem gotovo i ne primenjuje, a da novčana kazna u celini beleži stalni pad u učestalosti izricanja.
Stoga bi bilo dobro prilikom sledećih izmena u Krivičnom zakoniku opredeliti se za jedan od ova dva
sistema. Ukoliko bi to bio sistem novčane kazne u dnevnim iznosima, bilo bi neophodno učiniti značajne
izmene u načinu njegove primene koje bi bile u funkciji davanja širih ovlašćenja sudu u proceni prihoda i
rashoda učinioca i olakšanja utvrđivanja vrednosti dnevnih iznosa.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja = Institute of criminological and sociological research",
journal = "Krivične i prekršajne sankcije i mere : izricanje, izvršenje i uslovni otpust : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : Palić, 2-3. jun 2016. = Criminal and Misdemeanor Sanctions and Measures : Imposing, Enforcement and Conditional Release : Thematic conference proceedings of international significance : Palic, 2-3 june 2016.",
title = "Problemi propisivanja i odmeravanje novčane kazne u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu, Problems of prescription and determination of fine in our criminal legislation",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1724"
}

Kolarić, D.,& Đorđević, Đ.. (2016). Problemi propisivanja i odmeravanje novčane kazne u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. in Krivične i prekršajne sankcije i mere : izricanje, izvršenje i uslovni otpust : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : Palić, 2-3. jun 2016. = Criminal and Misdemeanor Sanctions and Measures : Imposing, Enforcement and Conditional Release : Thematic conference proceedings of international significance : Palic, 2-3 june 2016.
Beograd : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja = Institute of criminological and sociological research..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1724

Kolarić D, Đorđević Đ. Problemi propisivanja i odmeravanje novčane kazne u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. in Krivične i prekršajne sankcije i mere : izricanje, izvršenje i uslovni otpust : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : Palić, 2-3. jun 2016. = Criminal and Misdemeanor Sanctions and Measures : Imposing, Enforcement and Conditional Release : Thematic conference proceedings of international significance : Palic, 2-3 june 2016.. 2016;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1724 .

Kolarić, Dragana, Đorđević, Đorđe, "Problemi propisivanja i odmeravanje novčane kazne u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu" in Krivične i prekršajne sankcije i mere : izricanje, izvršenje i uslovni otpust : tematski zbornik radova međunarodnog značaja : Palić, 2-3. jun 2016. = Criminal and Misdemeanor Sanctions and Measures : Imposing, Enforcement and Conditional Release : Thematic conference proceedings of international significance : Palic, 2-3 june 2016. (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1724 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1092
AB  - Poslednjih godina u našoj zemlji sve više je prisutan problem preopterećenosti postojećih zatvorskih kapaciteta i s tim u vezi teškoće vezane za samo izvršenje kazne zatvora. Razlozi leže u sve većem broju izreženih zatvorskih kazni i njihovom dužem trajanju i povećanom broju pritvorenih lica, a sa druge strane u nedovoljnom broju i kapacitetu ustanova za izdržavanje ove kazne koji nije pratio ovo povećanje. Moguća rešenja ovog problema mogu se kretati u dva pravca: jedan, izgradnja novih smeštajnih kapaciteta i rekonstrukcija starih, i drugi, izmene u kaznenoj politici sudova. No to nikako ne bi smelo da znači da zbog tehničkog problema kakav je nedostatak zatvorskih kapaciteta sudovi treba da koriguju svoju kaznenu politiku u smislu njenog ublažavanja. Rešenje čini nam se leži u boljem korišćenju postojećih mogućnosti za zamenu kazne zatvora drugim sankcijama (novčana kazna, rad u javnom interesu, kućni zatvor), pre svega kada su u pitanju kratkotrajne kazne zatvora, kao i u adekvatnijoj primeni instituta uslovnog otpusta. U poslednje vreme pojedinim novih zakonskim rešenjima stvoreni su uslovi za bolju primenu ovih krivičnih sankcija i instituta, što bi moglo da doprinese rešavanju ili bar ublažavanju ovog novonastalog problema.
AB  - In recent years, there is a growing problem of prison overload and therefore difficulties associated with execution of imprisonment in our country. The
 reasons lie in increasing numbers of prison sentences and their longer duration
 as well as increased number of detainees, and on the other hand - insufficient
 capacity of existing institutions for serving the sentence, that did not follow this
 increase. Possible solutions to this problem can be found within two directions:
 one, construction of new capacities and reconstruction of old ones, or - changing the penal policy of the courts. However, this should not by any mean result
 with courts update their criminal policy in terms of its mitigation because of
 technical problem such as shortage of capacity. The solution seems to lie in better use of the existing possibilities for replacement of prison sentence with other
 sanctions (fines, community service, house arrest), especially when it comes to
 short-term imprisonment, as well as to adequate application of parole. Lately,
 some new legal solutions and conditions were introduced for better implementation of these criminal sanctions and institutes, which could contribute to solving or at least help reducing this problem.
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema
T1  - Problem of prison overload and possibile solutions
VL  - 53
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 75
EP  - 91
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Poslednjih godina u našoj zemlji sve više je prisutan problem preopterećenosti postojećih zatvorskih kapaciteta i s tim u vezi teškoće vezane za samo izvršenje kazne zatvora. Razlozi leže u sve većem broju izreženih zatvorskih kazni i njihovom dužem trajanju i povećanom broju pritvorenih lica, a sa druge strane u nedovoljnom broju i kapacitetu ustanova za izdržavanje ove kazne koji nije pratio ovo povećanje. Moguća rešenja ovog problema mogu se kretati u dva pravca: jedan, izgradnja novih smeštajnih kapaciteta i rekonstrukcija starih, i drugi, izmene u kaznenoj politici sudova. No to nikako ne bi smelo da znači da zbog tehničkog problema kakav je nedostatak zatvorskih kapaciteta sudovi treba da koriguju svoju kaznenu politiku u smislu njenog ublažavanja. Rešenje čini nam se leži u boljem korišćenju postojećih mogućnosti za zamenu kazne zatvora drugim sankcijama (novčana kazna, rad u javnom interesu, kućni zatvor), pre svega kada su u pitanju kratkotrajne kazne zatvora, kao i u adekvatnijoj primeni instituta uslovnog otpusta. U poslednje vreme pojedinim novih zakonskim rešenjima stvoreni su uslovi za bolju primenu ovih krivičnih sankcija i instituta, što bi moglo da doprinese rešavanju ili bar ublažavanju ovog novonastalog problema., In recent years, there is a growing problem of prison overload and therefore difficulties associated with execution of imprisonment in our country. The
 reasons lie in increasing numbers of prison sentences and their longer duration
 as well as increased number of detainees, and on the other hand - insufficient
 capacity of existing institutions for serving the sentence, that did not follow this
 increase. Possible solutions to this problem can be found within two directions:
 one, construction of new capacities and reconstruction of old ones, or - changing the penal policy of the courts. However, this should not by any mean result
 with courts update their criminal policy in terms of its mitigation because of
 technical problem such as shortage of capacity. The solution seems to lie in better use of the existing possibilities for replacement of prison sentence with other
 sanctions (fines, community service, house arrest), especially when it comes to
 short-term imprisonment, as well as to adequate application of parole. Lately,
 some new legal solutions and conditions were introduced for better implementation of these criminal sanctions and institutes, which could contribute to solving or at least help reducing this problem.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema, Problem of prison overload and possibile solutions",
volume = "53",
number = "2-3",
pages = "75-91",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2015). Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Beograd : Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu : Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja., 53(2-3), 75-91.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092

Đorđević Đ. Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2015;53(2-3):75-91.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Preopterećenost zatvorskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 53, no. 2-3 (2015):75-91,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1092 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/593
AB  - The new Code on misdemeanor of the Republic of Serbia, which came into force on March 1st this year, has brought a number of innovations in our misdemeanor law. Although the biggest changes were introduced into misdemeanor procedure along with part of the code that deals with procedure for enforcement of misdemeanor sanctions, there are also many new solutions related to institutes from the general section of misdemeanor law. They are in most cases designed to represent compliance with the provisions of the Criminal Code. However, there are opposite instances where innovations were introduced in order to emphasize the specificity of the misdemeanors as a special kind of offenses and make their delimitation from criminal offences. This paper analyzes the particular provisions relating to the concept of misdemeanor, misdemeanor liability, exceeding the limits of self-defense and extreme necessity, force and threat, mental incompetence, mistake of fact and law, complicity and certain provisions relating to misdemeanor sanctions. Most of the new solutions present an important step towards better regulation of certain important institutes of the General Part of the misdemeanor law, but there are also those that contain certain inaccuracies and inconsistencies that should be removed or changed de lege ferenda.
AB  - Novi Zakon o prekršajima Republike Srbije, koji je počeo da se primenjuje 1. marta ove godine, uneo je niz novina u naše prekršajno pravo. Iako su najveće izmene unete u njegov procesni deo kao i u deo koji se bavi izvršenjem prekršajnih sankcija, brojna su i nova rešenja koja se odnose na pojedine institute opšteg dela prekršajnog prava. Ona su uglavnom tako koncipirana da predstavljaju usaglašavanje sa odredbama Krivičnog zakonika, međutim ima i suprotnih primera gde su novine unete u nameri da se istaknu specifičnosti prekršaja kao posebne vrste delikata i izvrši njihovo razgraničenje od krivičnih dela. U radu se posebno analiziraju odredbe koje se odnose na pojam prekršaja, prekršajnu odgovornost, prekoračenje nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, silu i pretnju, neuračunljivost, stvarnu i pravnu zabludu, saučesništvo kao i pojedine odredbe vezane za prekršajne sankcije. Većina novih rešenja predstavlja značajan korak u boljem regulisanju pojedinih instituta opšteg dela prekršajnog prava, ali ima i onih koji sadrže određene nepreciznosti i nedoslednosti koje bi de lege ferenda trebalo otkloniti.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - New code of misdemeanor and innovations in general section of misdemeanor law
T1  - Novi zakon o prekršajima i novine u opštem delu prekršajnog prava
IS  - 2
SP  - 15
EP  - 26
DO  - 10.5937/NBP1402015D
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The new Code on misdemeanor of the Republic of Serbia, which came into force on March 1st this year, has brought a number of innovations in our misdemeanor law. Although the biggest changes were introduced into misdemeanor procedure along with part of the code that deals with procedure for enforcement of misdemeanor sanctions, there are also many new solutions related to institutes from the general section of misdemeanor law. They are in most cases designed to represent compliance with the provisions of the Criminal Code. However, there are opposite instances where innovations were introduced in order to emphasize the specificity of the misdemeanors as a special kind of offenses and make their delimitation from criminal offences. This paper analyzes the particular provisions relating to the concept of misdemeanor, misdemeanor liability, exceeding the limits of self-defense and extreme necessity, force and threat, mental incompetence, mistake of fact and law, complicity and certain provisions relating to misdemeanor sanctions. Most of the new solutions present an important step towards better regulation of certain important institutes of the General Part of the misdemeanor law, but there are also those that contain certain inaccuracies and inconsistencies that should be removed or changed de lege ferenda., Novi Zakon o prekršajima Republike Srbije, koji je počeo da se primenjuje 1. marta ove godine, uneo je niz novina u naše prekršajno pravo. Iako su najveće izmene unete u njegov procesni deo kao i u deo koji se bavi izvršenjem prekršajnih sankcija, brojna su i nova rešenja koja se odnose na pojedine institute opšteg dela prekršajnog prava. Ona su uglavnom tako koncipirana da predstavljaju usaglašavanje sa odredbama Krivičnog zakonika, međutim ima i suprotnih primera gde su novine unete u nameri da se istaknu specifičnosti prekršaja kao posebne vrste delikata i izvrši njihovo razgraničenje od krivičnih dela. U radu se posebno analiziraju odredbe koje se odnose na pojam prekršaja, prekršajnu odgovornost, prekoračenje nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, silu i pretnju, neuračunljivost, stvarnu i pravnu zabludu, saučesništvo kao i pojedine odredbe vezane za prekršajne sankcije. Većina novih rešenja predstavlja značajan korak u boljem regulisanju pojedinih instituta opšteg dela prekršajnog prava, ali ima i onih koji sadrže određene nepreciznosti i nedoslednosti koje bi de lege ferenda trebalo otkloniti.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "New code of misdemeanor and innovations in general section of misdemeanor law, Novi zakon o prekršajima i novine u opštem delu prekršajnog prava",
number = "2",
pages = "15-26",
doi = "10.5937/NBP1402015D"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2014). New code of misdemeanor and innovations in general section of misdemeanor law. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd.(2), 15-26.
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1402015D

Đorđević Đ. New code of misdemeanor and innovations in general section of misdemeanor law. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2014;(2):15-26.
doi:10.5937/NBP1402015D .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "New code of misdemeanor and innovations in general section of misdemeanor law" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, no. 2 (2014):15-26,
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1402015D . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ђорђевић, Ђорђе
AU  - Коларић, Драгана
AU  - Рисимовић, Радосав
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1659
PB  - Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије
T2  - Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС
T1  - Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7
SP  - 357
EP  - 401
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ђорђевић, Ђорђе and Коларић, Драгана and Рисимовић, Радосав",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије",
journal = "Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС",
booktitle = "Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7",
pages = "357-401",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659"
}

Ђорђевић, Ђ., Коларић, Д.,& Рисимовић, Р.. (2013). Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7. in Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС
Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије., 357-401.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659

Ђорђевић Ђ, Коларић Д, Рисимовић Р. Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7. in Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС. 2013;:357-401.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659 .

Ђорђевић, Ђорђе, Коларић, Драгана, Рисимовић, Радосав, "Кривично право : општи део. Одељак 7" in Приручник за припремање стручних испита запослених у МУП РС (2013):357-401,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_1659 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/405
AB  - Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim is a new security measure which has been introduced into our criminal law by the Amendments to the Criminal Code of September 2009. This security measure in our Criminal Code may be pronounced to a convicted person if it is reasonably considered that the offender's approaching and communicating with the victim would be dangerous for him. It consists of few prohibitions that the court may order to convicted person, and they are: the prohibition of the offender to approach to a victim, offender restraining order in the area around the residence of the victim or place of work, non-molestation of victim and prohibition communicating with the victim. Nature of this measure, requirements for his application and the application itself present many questions and potential problems. Solving these issues will determine the success of newly introduced measure and his goals.
AB  - Zabrana približavanja i komunikacije sa oštećenim je nova mera bezbednosti uvedena u naše krivično zakonodavstvo Zakonom o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika iz septembra 2009. Ova mera bezbednosti se po našem Krivičnom zakoniku može izreći osuđenom licu u slučajevima ako se opravdano može smatrati da bi prilaženje učinioca oštećenom i komuniciranje sa njim bilo opasno po oštećenog. Ona se sastoji u nekoliko zabrana koje sud može izreći osuđenom licu, a to su: zabrana učiniocu krivičnog dela da prilazi oštećenom na određenoj udaljenosti, zabrana pristupa učinioca u prostor oko mesta stanovanja oštećenog ili oko mesta u kome oštećeni radi, zabrana uznemiravanja oštećenog i zabrana komuniciranja sa oštećenim. U vezi sa samom sadržinom ove mere i uslovima za njenu primenu, a naročito njenim izvršenjem i kontrolom izvršenja postavljaju se brojna sporna pitanja od čijeg rešavanja zavisi u kojoj meri će novouvedena mera naći svoju primenu u praksi i ostvariti svoju svrhu.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim
T1  - Zabrana približavanja i komunikacije sa oštećenim
VL  - 49
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 431
EP  - 442
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_405
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim is a new security measure which has been introduced into our criminal law by the Amendments to the Criminal Code of September 2009. This security measure in our Criminal Code may be pronounced to a convicted person if it is reasonably considered that the offender's approaching and communicating with the victim would be dangerous for him. It consists of few prohibitions that the court may order to convicted person, and they are: the prohibition of the offender to approach to a victim, offender restraining order in the area around the residence of the victim or place of work, non-molestation of victim and prohibition communicating with the victim. Nature of this measure, requirements for his application and the application itself present many questions and potential problems. Solving these issues will determine the success of newly introduced measure and his goals., Zabrana približavanja i komunikacije sa oštećenim je nova mera bezbednosti uvedena u naše krivično zakonodavstvo Zakonom o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika iz septembra 2009. Ova mera bezbednosti se po našem Krivičnom zakoniku može izreći osuđenom licu u slučajevima ako se opravdano može smatrati da bi prilaženje učinioca oštećenom i komuniciranje sa njim bilo opasno po oštećenog. Ona se sastoji u nekoliko zabrana koje sud može izreći osuđenom licu, a to su: zabrana učiniocu krivičnog dela da prilazi oštećenom na određenoj udaljenosti, zabrana pristupa učinioca u prostor oko mesta stanovanja oštećenog ili oko mesta u kome oštećeni radi, zabrana uznemiravanja oštećenog i zabrana komuniciranja sa oštećenim. U vezi sa samom sadržinom ove mere i uslovima za njenu primenu, a naročito njenim izvršenjem i kontrolom izvršenja postavljaju se brojna sporna pitanja od čijeg rešavanja zavisi u kojoj meri će novouvedena mera naći svoju primenu u praksi i ostvariti svoju svrhu.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim, Zabrana približavanja i komunikacije sa oštećenim",
volume = "49",
number = "2-3",
pages = "431-442",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_405"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2011). Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 49(2-3), 431-442.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_405

Đorđević Đ. Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2011;49(2-3):431-442.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_405 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 49, no. 2-3 (2011):431-442,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_405 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/346
AB  - Penalty system in our criminal legislation has been severely changed with Criminal Code of 2005 and its changes in 2009. New penalties (community service and revocation of driver's license) were introduced along with new rules for determination of sentence. New solutions considering mitigation of penalty and remittance of punishment were also brought in. Criminal Code also incriminates two new institutes (voluntary prevention of consequence and settlement) as an optional ground for remittance of punishment. All these additions have opened new possibilities for determination of sentence and mitigation of penalty and their better adjustment to committed crime and its offender. However, some new problems occur on the process of mitigation of penalty. Therefore, it is necessary to find fast and proper solutions for these problems, not only through application of new rules but also through research of some future solutions that could be however found in next set of changes of Criminal code.
AB  - Krivičnim zakonikom iz 2005. godine i njegovim kasnijim izmenama i dopunama iz 2009. godine unete su značajne novine kako u sistem kazni u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu, tako i u pravila o odmeravanju, ublažavanju i oslobođenju od kazne. Neke od ovih izmena bile su u funkciji proširivanja mogućnosti oslobođenja od kazne i ublažavanja kazne, kao što je uvođenje novih instituta stvarnog kajanja i poravnanja, ali su neke donete sa ciljem da se ublažavanje kazne u nekim slučajevima i za neka krivična dela ograniči. To je, s jedne strane, otvorilo nove, dodatne mogućnosti za odmeravanje kazne i njeno što bolje prilagođavanje učinjenom delu i njegovom učiniocu, ali stvorilo i nove probleme i nedoumice naročito prilikom ublažavanja kazne. Stoga je neophodno njihovo što brže i adekvatnije rešavanje, ne samo kroz doslednu primenu novih propisa, već i kroz iznalaženje novih, celishodnijih rešenja ovih pitanja prilikom eventualnih izmena i dopuna Krivičnog zakonika.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - New rules about mitigation of penalty in Criminal Code of Serbia
T1  - Nova rešenja o ublažavanju kazne u KZ Srbije
VL  - 48
IS  - 3
SP  - 161
EP  - 172
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_346
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Penalty system in our criminal legislation has been severely changed with Criminal Code of 2005 and its changes in 2009. New penalties (community service and revocation of driver's license) were introduced along with new rules for determination of sentence. New solutions considering mitigation of penalty and remittance of punishment were also brought in. Criminal Code also incriminates two new institutes (voluntary prevention of consequence and settlement) as an optional ground for remittance of punishment. All these additions have opened new possibilities for determination of sentence and mitigation of penalty and their better adjustment to committed crime and its offender. However, some new problems occur on the process of mitigation of penalty. Therefore, it is necessary to find fast and proper solutions for these problems, not only through application of new rules but also through research of some future solutions that could be however found in next set of changes of Criminal code., Krivičnim zakonikom iz 2005. godine i njegovim kasnijim izmenama i dopunama iz 2009. godine unete su značajne novine kako u sistem kazni u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu, tako i u pravila o odmeravanju, ublažavanju i oslobođenju od kazne. Neke od ovih izmena bile su u funkciji proširivanja mogućnosti oslobođenja od kazne i ublažavanja kazne, kao što je uvođenje novih instituta stvarnog kajanja i poravnanja, ali su neke donete sa ciljem da se ublažavanje kazne u nekim slučajevima i za neka krivična dela ograniči. To je, s jedne strane, otvorilo nove, dodatne mogućnosti za odmeravanje kazne i njeno što bolje prilagođavanje učinjenom delu i njegovom učiniocu, ali stvorilo i nove probleme i nedoumice naročito prilikom ublažavanja kazne. Stoga je neophodno njihovo što brže i adekvatnije rešavanje, ne samo kroz doslednu primenu novih propisa, već i kroz iznalaženje novih, celishodnijih rešenja ovih pitanja prilikom eventualnih izmena i dopuna Krivičnog zakonika.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "New rules about mitigation of penalty in Criminal Code of Serbia, Nova rešenja o ublažavanju kazne u KZ Srbije",
volume = "48",
number = "3",
pages = "161-172",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_346"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2010). New rules about mitigation of penalty in Criminal Code of Serbia. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 48(3), 161-172.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_346

Đorđević Đ. New rules about mitigation of penalty in Criminal Code of Serbia. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2010;48(3):161-172.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_346 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "New rules about mitigation of penalty in Criminal Code of Serbia" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 48, no. 3 (2010):161-172,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_346 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/221
AB  - Suspension of driving licence is a new punishment in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia which hasn't existed in our criminal legislation up until now. However, it is not new in comparative criminal law, because certain contemporary criminal codes already foresee it under different names, for example French Criminal Code, Hungarian Criminal Code, Spanish Criminal Code and Portuguese Criminal Code, while some foresee it as both punishment and security measure, as in the cases of German Criminal Code, Slovenian Criminal Code, and our Criminal code. Parallel existence of driving licence suspension and security measure of ban on driving a motor vehicle in our Criminal Code requires determination of differences in concept and content between these two criminal sanctions. This difference has to be sought in purpose of implementation one or the other sanction and in conditions for their pronouncement. Given the relationship between these two sanctions, the Criminal Code foresees that the suspension of driving licence can not be pronounced together with the security measure of ban on driving a motor vehicle. Suspension of driving licence may be pronounced both as principal and as secondary sanction. It may be pronounced as principal punishment for criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of up to two years, and it may me pronounced as secondary punishment together with any other principal punishment (imprisonment, community service, fine). Duration of the penalty may not be less than one nor more than three years, and general condition for its pronunciation is that a motor vehicle was used for preparation or commission of an offence. Although this punishment by its nature refers to criminal offences against public traffic safety, the Criminal Code has set the possibility of its use much wider, connecting it to the use of motor vehicle in preparation or commission of a criminal offence, which can be interpreted very broad. It could be concluded that this punishment is acceptable, observing the increase in number of punishments and expanding possibilities of their individualization, and also as another alternative to imprisonment in particular cases. However, considering numerous problems regarding its prescription and implementation in practice, it is evident that provisions on this punishment should be worked out, altered and amended in more details, in order to provide its adequate use, and hence accomplishment of the purpose of punishment.
AB  - Novi Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije predvideo je u svom sistemu krivičnih sankcija oduzimanje vozačke dozvole kao novu vrstu kazne. Ova kazna se prvi put pojavljuje u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu, ali u uporednom krivičnom pravu ne predstavlja novinu. Ona se može izreći i kao glavna i kao sporedna kazna, ali se ne može izreći zajedno sa merom bezbednosti zabrane upravljanja motornim vozilom. Kazna oduzimanja vozačke dozvole se pojavljuje kao korisna novina jer proširuje mogućnosti individualizacije kazne i predstavlja moguću alternativu kazni zatvora u pojedinim slučajevima, ali brojni problemi u vezi sa njenim propisivanjem i primenom u praksi nameću potrebu da se odredbe o ovoj kazni detaljnije razrade, dopune i izmene.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Suspension of driving licence
T1  - Kazna oduzimanja vozačke dozvole
VL  - 13
IS  - 1
SP  - 3
EP  - 13
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_221
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Suspension of driving licence is a new punishment in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia which hasn't existed in our criminal legislation up until now. However, it is not new in comparative criminal law, because certain contemporary criminal codes already foresee it under different names, for example French Criminal Code, Hungarian Criminal Code, Spanish Criminal Code and Portuguese Criminal Code, while some foresee it as both punishment and security measure, as in the cases of German Criminal Code, Slovenian Criminal Code, and our Criminal code. Parallel existence of driving licence suspension and security measure of ban on driving a motor vehicle in our Criminal Code requires determination of differences in concept and content between these two criminal sanctions. This difference has to be sought in purpose of implementation one or the other sanction and in conditions for their pronouncement. Given the relationship between these two sanctions, the Criminal Code foresees that the suspension of driving licence can not be pronounced together with the security measure of ban on driving a motor vehicle. Suspension of driving licence may be pronounced both as principal and as secondary sanction. It may be pronounced as principal punishment for criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of up to two years, and it may me pronounced as secondary punishment together with any other principal punishment (imprisonment, community service, fine). Duration of the penalty may not be less than one nor more than three years, and general condition for its pronunciation is that a motor vehicle was used for preparation or commission of an offence. Although this punishment by its nature refers to criminal offences against public traffic safety, the Criminal Code has set the possibility of its use much wider, connecting it to the use of motor vehicle in preparation or commission of a criminal offence, which can be interpreted very broad. It could be concluded that this punishment is acceptable, observing the increase in number of punishments and expanding possibilities of their individualization, and also as another alternative to imprisonment in particular cases. However, considering numerous problems regarding its prescription and implementation in practice, it is evident that provisions on this punishment should be worked out, altered and amended in more details, in order to provide its adequate use, and hence accomplishment of the purpose of punishment., Novi Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije predvideo je u svom sistemu krivičnih sankcija oduzimanje vozačke dozvole kao novu vrstu kazne. Ova kazna se prvi put pojavljuje u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu, ali u uporednom krivičnom pravu ne predstavlja novinu. Ona se može izreći i kao glavna i kao sporedna kazna, ali se ne može izreći zajedno sa merom bezbednosti zabrane upravljanja motornim vozilom. Kazna oduzimanja vozačke dozvole se pojavljuje kao korisna novina jer proširuje mogućnosti individualizacije kazne i predstavlja moguću alternativu kazni zatvora u pojedinim slučajevima, ali brojni problemi u vezi sa njenim propisivanjem i primenom u praksi nameću potrebu da se odredbe o ovoj kazni detaljnije razrade, dopune i izmene.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Suspension of driving licence, Kazna oduzimanja vozačke dozvole",
volume = "13",
number = "1",
pages = "3-13",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_221"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2008). Suspension of driving licence. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 13(1), 3-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_221

Đorđević Đ. Suspension of driving licence. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2008;13(1):3-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_221 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Suspension of driving licence" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 13, no. 1 (2008):3-13,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_221 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/197
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Criminal law protection of life and bodily integrity of official persons
T1  - Krivičnopravna zaštita života i telesnog integriteta službenih lica
VL  - 57
IS  - 9
SP  - 91
EP  - 103
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_197
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2008",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Criminal law protection of life and bodily integrity of official persons, Krivičnopravna zaštita života i telesnog integriteta službenih lica",
volume = "57",
number = "9",
pages = "91-103",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_197"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2008). Criminal law protection of life and bodily integrity of official persons. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 57(9), 91-103.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_197

Đorđević Đ. Criminal law protection of life and bodily integrity of official persons. in Pravni život. 2008;57(9):91-103.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_197 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Criminal law protection of life and bodily integrity of official persons" in Pravni život, 57, no. 9 (2008):91-103,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_197 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/187
AB  - The domestic violence, as specific form of violence, is the substantial social phenomena both in Serbia and other countries which has started to be considered with increased interest. Although primarily perceived as social and phychological notion, this form of violence has its criminal law significance that has emerged with the inclusion of the new provisions in the criminal law legislation. This has been done for the first time in 2002 when the then Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia has set forth the new criminal offence of domestic violence. The new Serbian Criminal Code of 2005 has slightly modified this provision by providing for - murder of a family member, as the new form of the qualified murder. The reasons for prescribing for the new provisions in our criminal law legislation should be sought in the fact that the domestic violence comes as a new and specific form of violence, given the setting in which it takes place, as well as its victims and perpetrators. The aim for the inclusion of the new forms of incrimination was to provide for the specific legal protection of family members from different forms of violence. This has proved to be significant step in criminal law with the view to abolish violent behaviour in contemporary society.
AB  - Nasilje u porodici, kao specifičan oblik nasilja, veoma je aktuelan društveni fenomen kod nas i u svetu i njegovom izučavanju se u poslednje vreme posvećuje velika pažnja. Iako prevashodno socijalna i psihološka pojava ovaj oblik nasilja ima i svoj krivičnopravni značaj, posebno u novije vreme kada je došlo do unošenja u naše krivično zakonodavstvo novih odredaba koje se upravo odnose na ovu problematiku. To je prvi put učinjeno 2002. godine kada je u tada važeći Krivični zakon Republike Srbije uneto novo krivično delo pod nazivom 'Nasilje u porodici'. Novi Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije iz 2005. godine zadržao je nešto izmenjenu ovu odredbu, a takođe je predvideo još jednu, najtežu inkriminaciju u ovoj oblasti, krivično delo ubistva člana porodice, kao nov oblik teškog ubistva. Razlozi za unošenje ovih odredbi u naše krivično zakonodavstvo, s obzirom da su vidovi nasilja obuhvaćeni ovim inkriminacijama već bili inkriminisani u našem pozitivnom krivičnom pravu nalaze se u činjenici da je nasilje u porodici posebna i specifična vrsta nasilja, pre svega po tome gde se ono događa i ko su njegovi izvršioci i njegove žrtve. Cilj uvođenja ovih novih inkriminacija bio je da se članovima porodice pruži posebna krivičnopravna zaštita od različitih oblika nasilja koje pojedini članovi vrše, čime je i sa kriminalno-političkog aspekta učinjen značajan korak na planu suzbijanja ovakvih nasilničkih ponašanja u našem savremenom društvu.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - The criminal offence of domestic violence
T1  - Krivična dela nasilja u porodici
VL  - 45
IS  - 3
SP  - 121
EP  - 133
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_187
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2007",
abstract = "The domestic violence, as specific form of violence, is the substantial social phenomena both in Serbia and other countries which has started to be considered with increased interest. Although primarily perceived as social and phychological notion, this form of violence has its criminal law significance that has emerged with the inclusion of the new provisions in the criminal law legislation. This has been done for the first time in 2002 when the then Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia has set forth the new criminal offence of domestic violence. The new Serbian Criminal Code of 2005 has slightly modified this provision by providing for - murder of a family member, as the new form of the qualified murder. The reasons for prescribing for the new provisions in our criminal law legislation should be sought in the fact that the domestic violence comes as a new and specific form of violence, given the setting in which it takes place, as well as its victims and perpetrators. The aim for the inclusion of the new forms of incrimination was to provide for the specific legal protection of family members from different forms of violence. This has proved to be significant step in criminal law with the view to abolish violent behaviour in contemporary society., Nasilje u porodici, kao specifičan oblik nasilja, veoma je aktuelan društveni fenomen kod nas i u svetu i njegovom izučavanju se u poslednje vreme posvećuje velika pažnja. Iako prevashodno socijalna i psihološka pojava ovaj oblik nasilja ima i svoj krivičnopravni značaj, posebno u novije vreme kada je došlo do unošenja u naše krivično zakonodavstvo novih odredaba koje se upravo odnose na ovu problematiku. To je prvi put učinjeno 2002. godine kada je u tada važeći Krivični zakon Republike Srbije uneto novo krivično delo pod nazivom 'Nasilje u porodici'. Novi Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije iz 2005. godine zadržao je nešto izmenjenu ovu odredbu, a takođe je predvideo još jednu, najtežu inkriminaciju u ovoj oblasti, krivično delo ubistva člana porodice, kao nov oblik teškog ubistva. Razlozi za unošenje ovih odredbi u naše krivično zakonodavstvo, s obzirom da su vidovi nasilja obuhvaćeni ovim inkriminacijama već bili inkriminisani u našem pozitivnom krivičnom pravu nalaze se u činjenici da je nasilje u porodici posebna i specifična vrsta nasilja, pre svega po tome gde se ono događa i ko su njegovi izvršioci i njegove žrtve. Cilj uvođenja ovih novih inkriminacija bio je da se članovima porodice pruži posebna krivičnopravna zaštita od različitih oblika nasilja koje pojedini članovi vrše, čime je i sa kriminalno-političkog aspekta učinjen značajan korak na planu suzbijanja ovakvih nasilničkih ponašanja u našem savremenom društvu.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "The criminal offence of domestic violence, Krivična dela nasilja u porodici",
volume = "45",
number = "3",
pages = "121-133",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_187"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2007). The criminal offence of domestic violence. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 45(3), 121-133.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_187

Đorđević Đ. The criminal offence of domestic violence. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2007;45(3):121-133.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_187 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "The criminal offence of domestic violence" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 45, no. 3 (2007):121-133,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_187 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/184
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Criminal law aspects of domestic violence
T1  - Krivično-pravni aspekti nasilja u porodici
VL  - 56
IS  - 9
SP  - 55
EP  - 67
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_184
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2007",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Criminal law aspects of domestic violence, Krivično-pravni aspekti nasilja u porodici",
volume = "56",
number = "9",
pages = "55-67",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_184"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2007). Criminal law aspects of domestic violence. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 56(9), 55-67.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_184

Đorđević Đ. Criminal law aspects of domestic violence. in Pravni život. 2007;56(9):55-67.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_184 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Criminal law aspects of domestic violence" in Pravni život, 56, no. 9 (2007):55-67,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_184 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/130
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Endangerment of life by failure to provide assistance
T1  - Ugrožavanje života nepružanjem pomoći
VL  - 55
IS  - 9
SP  - 201
EP  - 215
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_130
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2006",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Endangerment of life by failure to provide assistance, Ugrožavanje života nepružanjem pomoći",
volume = "55",
number = "9",
pages = "201-215",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_130"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2006). Endangerment of life by failure to provide assistance. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 55(9), 201-215.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_130

Đorđević Đ. Endangerment of life by failure to provide assistance. in Pravni život. 2006;55(9):201-215.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_130 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Endangerment of life by failure to provide assistance" in Pravni život, 55, no. 9 (2006):201-215,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_130 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/113
AB  - In November 2005, new Law of Delict was adopted, which brought important novelties in our delict-related legislation, both in its material and procedural parts. To pass a new law of delict was necessary for many reasons primarily because of the need for additional adjustments following the discontinued use of Law on Delict that used to break federal regulations, but also because of the adjustments with the international regulations and newly-adopted regulations of criminal material and procedural legislation. Due to the necessity to adjust other delict regulations with the new Law of Delict and the need to constitute new police courts, as well as to make certain organizational and technical preparations, the application of the new law was postponed for January 01, 2007. The most important changes in material part of the new law refer to introduction of the notion of delict and delict liability, as well as to the introduction of new penalties: work in public interest and penal points as punishment, forbidding the access to the injured party, facilities or the place where the delict was made and public announcement of the sentences as protective measures, and so-called special measures as correctional measures towards juveniles. As for the delict procedure, the most important novelties refer to institutions leading the procedure, especially introduction of police courts as completely new institutions within our judicial system, but also to the bigger role of public prosecutor, strengthening of the principle of initiation of delict procedure, measures to ensure the presence of the accused, reaching the verdict instead of decision on the delict, et cetera.
AB  - Novembra 2005. godine donet je novi Zakon o prekršajima čime su u naše prekšajno zakonodavstvo unete značajne novine kako u njegovom materijalnom tako i u procesnom delu. Donošenje novog Zakona o prekršajima bilo je nephodno iz više razloga, pre svega zbog potrebe dodatnih usklađivanja nastale posle prestanka primene Zakona o prekršajima kojim se povređuju savezne propisi, ali i zbog usaglašavanja sa međunarodnim propisima i novo usvojenim propisima krivičnog materijalnog i procesnog zakonodavstva. Zbog neophodnosti usklađivanja drugih prekršajnih propisa sa novim Zakonom o prekršajima i potrebe da se konstituišu novi prekršajni sudovi, kao i da bi se izvršile određene organizacione i tehničke pripreme, početak primene novog Zakona odložen je za 1. januar 2007. godine. Najznačajnije izmene u materijalnom delu novog zakona odnose se na novo određenje pojmova prekršaja i prekršajne odgovornosti, kao i na uvođenje novih prekršajnih sankcija: rad u javnom interesu i kazneni poeni kao kazne, zabrana pristupa oštećenom objektima ili mestu izvršenja prekršaja i javno objavljivanje presude kao zaštitne mere, i tzv. posebne mere, kao vaspitne mera prema maloletnicima. Što se tiče prekršajnog postupka, najznačajnije novine odnose se na organe za vođenje ovog postupka, naročito na uvođenje sudova za prekršaje kao potpuno novih organa u našem pravosudnom sistemu, ali i na veću ulogu javnog tužioca jačanje načela pokretanja prekršajnog postupka, mere za obezbeđenje prisustva okrivljenog, donošenje presude umesto rešenja o prekršaju i dr.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Main characteristics of new law of delict
T1  - Osnovne karakteristike novog zakona o prekršajima
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
SP  - 51
EP  - 73
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_113
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2006",
abstract = "In November 2005, new Law of Delict was adopted, which brought important novelties in our delict-related legislation, both in its material and procedural parts. To pass a new law of delict was necessary for many reasons primarily because of the need for additional adjustments following the discontinued use of Law on Delict that used to break federal regulations, but also because of the adjustments with the international regulations and newly-adopted regulations of criminal material and procedural legislation. Due to the necessity to adjust other delict regulations with the new Law of Delict and the need to constitute new police courts, as well as to make certain organizational and technical preparations, the application of the new law was postponed for January 01, 2007. The most important changes in material part of the new law refer to introduction of the notion of delict and delict liability, as well as to the introduction of new penalties: work in public interest and penal points as punishment, forbidding the access to the injured party, facilities or the place where the delict was made and public announcement of the sentences as protective measures, and so-called special measures as correctional measures towards juveniles. As for the delict procedure, the most important novelties refer to institutions leading the procedure, especially introduction of police courts as completely new institutions within our judicial system, but also to the bigger role of public prosecutor, strengthening of the principle of initiation of delict procedure, measures to ensure the presence of the accused, reaching the verdict instead of decision on the delict, et cetera., Novembra 2005. godine donet je novi Zakon o prekršajima čime su u naše prekšajno zakonodavstvo unete značajne novine kako u njegovom materijalnom tako i u procesnom delu. Donošenje novog Zakona o prekršajima bilo je nephodno iz više razloga, pre svega zbog potrebe dodatnih usklađivanja nastale posle prestanka primene Zakona o prekršajima kojim se povređuju savezne propisi, ali i zbog usaglašavanja sa međunarodnim propisima i novo usvojenim propisima krivičnog materijalnog i procesnog zakonodavstva. Zbog neophodnosti usklađivanja drugih prekršajnih propisa sa novim Zakonom o prekršajima i potrebe da se konstituišu novi prekršajni sudovi, kao i da bi se izvršile određene organizacione i tehničke pripreme, početak primene novog Zakona odložen je za 1. januar 2007. godine. Najznačajnije izmene u materijalnom delu novog zakona odnose se na novo određenje pojmova prekršaja i prekršajne odgovornosti, kao i na uvođenje novih prekršajnih sankcija: rad u javnom interesu i kazneni poeni kao kazne, zabrana pristupa oštećenom objektima ili mestu izvršenja prekršaja i javno objavljivanje presude kao zaštitne mere, i tzv. posebne mere, kao vaspitne mera prema maloletnicima. Što se tiče prekršajnog postupka, najznačajnije novine odnose se na organe za vođenje ovog postupka, naročito na uvođenje sudova za prekršaje kao potpuno novih organa u našem pravosudnom sistemu, ali i na veću ulogu javnog tužioca jačanje načela pokretanja prekršajnog postupka, mere za obezbeđenje prisustva okrivljenog, donošenje presude umesto rešenja o prekršaju i dr.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Main characteristics of new law of delict, Osnovne karakteristike novog zakona o prekršajima",
volume = "11",
number = "1",
pages = "51-73",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_113"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2006). Main characteristics of new law of delict. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 11(1), 51-73.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_113

Đorđević Đ. Main characteristics of new law of delict. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2006;11(1):51-73.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_113 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Main characteristics of new law of delict" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 11, no. 1 (2006):51-73,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_113 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2005
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/78
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - New forms of first degree murders in the draft criminal code
T1  - Novi oblici teških ubistava u predlogu krivičnog zakonika
VL  - 54
IS  - 9
SP  - 135
EP  - 154
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_78
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2005",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "New forms of first degree murders in the draft criminal code, Novi oblici teških ubistava u predlogu krivičnog zakonika",
volume = "54",
number = "9",
pages = "135-154",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_78"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2005). New forms of first degree murders in the draft criminal code. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 54(9), 135-154.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_78

Đorđević Đ. New forms of first degree murders in the draft criminal code. in Pravni život. 2005;54(9):135-154.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_78 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "New forms of first degree murders in the draft criminal code" in Pravni život, 54, no. 9 (2005):135-154,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_78 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2004
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/71
PB  - Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Penal protection from acts of violence at sports events
T1  - Kaznenopravna zaštita od nasilja na sportskim priredbama
VL  - 53
IS  - 9
SP  - 151
EP  - 169
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_71
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2004",
publisher = "Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Penal protection from acts of violence at sports events, Kaznenopravna zaštita od nasilja na sportskim priredbama",
volume = "53",
number = "9",
pages = "151-169",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_71"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2004). Penal protection from acts of violence at sports events. in Pravni život
Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije., 53(9), 151-169.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_71

Đorđević Đ. Penal protection from acts of violence at sports events. in Pravni život. 2004;53(9):151-169.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_71 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Penal protection from acts of violence at sports events" in Pravni život, 53, no. 9 (2004):151-169,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_71 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2003
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/51
AB  - This paper describes the manners of meting out a penalty in the law of torts. In contrast to criminal law, the law of torts uses three systems of meting out the tortuous penalty: The system of relatively defined penalties, the system of absolutely defined penalties and the system of proportionate penalties. The system of relatively defined penalties is dominant, but the other two also apply to some torts. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these systems as well as the range of their application in the domestic law of torts. It also points to the differences emerging in our codes of torts to this effect as well as to the need to overcome them in the course of forthcoming reform of our tort-related legislation.
AB  - U radu se govori o načinima odmeravanja kazne u prekršajnom pravu. Za razliku od krivičnog prava, u prekršajnom pravu se koriste tri sistema odmeravanja prekršajne kazne: Sistem relativno određenih kazni, sistem apsolutno određenih kazni i sistem proporcionalnih kazni. Dominantan je sistem relativno određenih kazni, ali za pojedine vrste prekršaja u primeni su i druga dva sistema. U članku se analiziraju prednosti i nedostaci ovih sistema kao i dometi njihove primene u našem prekršajnom pravu. Takođe se ukazuje na razlike koje se po ovim pitanjima pojavljuju u našim prekršajnim zakonima, kao i na potrebu njihovog prevazilaženja prilikom predstojeće reforme našeg prekršajnog zakonodavstva.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko- policijska akademija
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Meting out penalty in law of torts
T1  - Odmeravanje kazne u prekršajnom pravu
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
SP  - 51
EP  - 70
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_51
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2003",
abstract = "This paper describes the manners of meting out a penalty in the law of torts. In contrast to criminal law, the law of torts uses three systems of meting out the tortuous penalty: The system of relatively defined penalties, the system of absolutely defined penalties and the system of proportionate penalties. The system of relatively defined penalties is dominant, but the other two also apply to some torts. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these systems as well as the range of their application in the domestic law of torts. It also points to the differences emerging in our codes of torts to this effect as well as to the need to overcome them in the course of forthcoming reform of our tort-related legislation., U radu se govori o načinima odmeravanja kazne u prekršajnom pravu. Za razliku od krivičnog prava, u prekršajnom pravu se koriste tri sistema odmeravanja prekršajne kazne: Sistem relativno određenih kazni, sistem apsolutno određenih kazni i sistem proporcionalnih kazni. Dominantan je sistem relativno određenih kazni, ali za pojedine vrste prekršaja u primeni su i druga dva sistema. U članku se analiziraju prednosti i nedostaci ovih sistema kao i dometi njihove primene u našem prekršajnom pravu. Takođe se ukazuje na razlike koje se po ovim pitanjima pojavljuju u našim prekršajnim zakonima, kao i na potrebu njihovog prevazilaženja prilikom predstojeće reforme našeg prekršajnog zakonodavstva.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko- policijska akademija",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Meting out penalty in law of torts, Odmeravanje kazne u prekršajnom pravu",
volume = "8",
number = "1",
pages = "51-70",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_51"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2003). Meting out penalty in law of torts. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Beograd : Kriminalističko- policijska akademija., 8(1), 51-70.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_51

Đorđević Đ. Meting out penalty in law of torts. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2003;8(1):51-70.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_51 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Meting out penalty in law of torts" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 8, no. 1 (2003):51-70,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_51 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2003
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/42
PB  - Beograd : Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Milan Milošević, Aleksandar Bošković: Priručnik za krivično procesno pravo, Policijska akademija, Beograd, 2003
VL  - 45
IS  - 2
SP  - 289
EP  - 291
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_42
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2003",
publisher = "Beograd : Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Milan Milošević, Aleksandar Bošković: Priručnik za krivično procesno pravo, Policijska akademija, Beograd, 2003",
volume = "45",
number = "2",
pages = "289-291",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_42"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2003). Milan Milošević, Aleksandar Bošković: Priručnik za krivično procesno pravo, Policijska akademija, Beograd, 2003. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Beograd : Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije., 45(2), 289-291.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_42

Đorđević Đ. Milan Milošević, Aleksandar Bošković: Priručnik za krivično procesno pravo, Policijska akademija, Beograd, 2003. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2003;45(2):289-291.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_42 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Milan Milošević, Aleksandar Bošković: Priručnik za krivično procesno pravo, Policijska akademija, Beograd, 2003" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 45, no. 2 (2003):289-291,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_42 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2002
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/38
AB  - Robbery is one of the most serious criminal offences, its more serious forms belonging to the group of the most serious criminal offences in general. Robbery is a complex criminal offence consisting of theft and constraint, while its more serious forms comprise the criminal offence of bodily injury or murder. According to our criminal law this criminal offence occurs when a criminal, caught in the act of theft, in order to retain the stolen thing uses force or threat of force against some person's life or body. In criminal legislation of other countries this criminal offence is defined in a similar way, although there are differences in the way this criminal offence is determined and in specification of its elements. As a consequence, some criminal codes treat this criminal offence as a separate criminal offence, some treat it as a special form of theft, some as a form of robbery, while some speak of it together with the criminal offence of robbery within the same article. In addition, there are differences regarding regulation of the character of the used threat, depending on the fact weather any kind of threat is sufficient for the existence of such criminal offence, or only a threat to attack life or body. There are also differences concerning the objective to be attained by means of force or threat. Usually it is the intention to retain the stolen thing, but some criminal codes speak also of intention of the criminal to escape. It has to be kept in mind that in criminal legislation there also are differences regarding the definition of the concept of theft, the concept used in case of this criminal offence too, according to whether theft is conceived as taking away of someone else's movable thing, or also by intention of its appropriation or by intention to acquire unlawful material benefit for oneself or for others. A certain number of criminal codes prescribe as more serious forms of robbery cases when a person has suffered serious bodily injury or has been murdered.
AB  - Krivično delo razbojničke krađe je jedno od najtežih imovinskih krivičnih dela, a njegovi teži oblici spadaju u najteža krivična dela uopšte. Razbojnička krađa je složeno krivično delo koje se sastoji od krivičnog dela krađe i krivičnog dela prinude, a njegovi teži oblici sadrže i krivično delo telesne povrede odnosno krivično delo ubistva. U našem krivičnom pravu ovo krivično delo je određeno tako što ono postoji kada je učinilac krivičnog dela krađe zatečen na delu, pa u nameri da ukradenu stvar zadrži upotrebi protiv nekog lica silu ili pretnju da će neposredno napasti na život ili telo. Na sličan način ovo krivično delo je predviđeno i u krivičnim zakonicima drugih zemalja, s tim da među njima postoje razlike u pogledu načina određivanja ovog krivičnog dela, kao i u pogledu preciziranja njegovih elemenata.
T2  - Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
T1  - Criminal offence of robbery in contemporary criminal law
T1  - Krivično delo razbojničke krađe u savremenom krivičnom pravu
VL  - 88
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 37
EP  - 66
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_38
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2002",
abstract = "Robbery is one of the most serious criminal offences, its more serious forms belonging to the group of the most serious criminal offences in general. Robbery is a complex criminal offence consisting of theft and constraint, while its more serious forms comprise the criminal offence of bodily injury or murder. According to our criminal law this criminal offence occurs when a criminal, caught in the act of theft, in order to retain the stolen thing uses force or threat of force against some person's life or body. In criminal legislation of other countries this criminal offence is defined in a similar way, although there are differences in the way this criminal offence is determined and in specification of its elements. As a consequence, some criminal codes treat this criminal offence as a separate criminal offence, some treat it as a special form of theft, some as a form of robbery, while some speak of it together with the criminal offence of robbery within the same article. In addition, there are differences regarding regulation of the character of the used threat, depending on the fact weather any kind of threat is sufficient for the existence of such criminal offence, or only a threat to attack life or body. There are also differences concerning the objective to be attained by means of force or threat. Usually it is the intention to retain the stolen thing, but some criminal codes speak also of intention of the criminal to escape. It has to be kept in mind that in criminal legislation there also are differences regarding the definition of the concept of theft, the concept used in case of this criminal offence too, according to whether theft is conceived as taking away of someone else's movable thing, or also by intention of its appropriation or by intention to acquire unlawful material benefit for oneself or for others. A certain number of criminal codes prescribe as more serious forms of robbery cases when a person has suffered serious bodily injury or has been murdered., Krivično delo razbojničke krađe je jedno od najtežih imovinskih krivičnih dela, a njegovi teži oblici spadaju u najteža krivična dela uopšte. Razbojnička krađa je složeno krivično delo koje se sastoji od krivičnog dela krađe i krivičnog dela prinude, a njegovi teži oblici sadrže i krivično delo telesne povrede odnosno krivično delo ubistva. U našem krivičnom pravu ovo krivično delo je određeno tako što ono postoji kada je učinilac krivičnog dela krađe zatečen na delu, pa u nameri da ukradenu stvar zadrži upotrebi protiv nekog lica silu ili pretnju da će neposredno napasti na život ili telo. Na sličan način ovo krivično delo je predviđeno i u krivičnim zakonicima drugih zemalja, s tim da među njima postoje razlike u pogledu načina određivanja ovog krivičnog dela, kao i u pogledu preciziranja njegovih elemenata.",
journal = "Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke",
title = "Criminal offence of robbery in contemporary criminal law, Krivično delo razbojničke krađe u savremenom krivičnom pravu",
volume = "88",
number = "1-2",
pages = "37-66",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_38"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2002). Criminal offence of robbery in contemporary criminal law. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 88(1-2), 37-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_38

Đorđević Đ. Criminal offence of robbery in contemporary criminal law. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. 2002;88(1-2):37-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_38 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Criminal offence of robbery in contemporary criminal law" in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 88, no. 1-2 (2002):37-66,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_38 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Stajić, Ljubomir S.
AU  - Jovašević, Dragan
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
AU  - Milošević, Milan
AU  - Brković, Vladimir
PY  - 2002
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/30
AB  - During 2001, at Police Academy in Belgrade, the research had been conducted with the defined goal to establish the scope and quality of adopted knowledge and skills by the students of this institution and, at the same time, it has immediate practical significance for their competence for carrying out entrusted jobs and tasks in the organs of interior affairs (police).It is certain that efficiency, promptness, professionalism and legality in carrying out the jobs and tasks by police officers depend, at great extent, on their professional training level. This paper analyzes the results which are obtained by the conducted research at Police Academy.
AB  - Tokom 2001. godine, na Policijskoj akademiji u Beogradu sprovedeno je istraživanje sa osnovnim ciljem da se ustanove obim i kvalitet usvojenog znanja i veština studenata u toj instituciji i istovremeno njihov neposredni praktični značaj za njihovu sposobnost u obavljanju poverenih poslova i zadataka u organima unutrašnjih poslova (policiji). Sigurno je da efikasnost, odgovornost, profesionalizam i zakonitost u obavljanju poslova i zadataka policajca u mnogome zavisi od nivoa njihove profesionalne obuke. U ovom radu su analizirani rezultati dobijeni sprovedenim istraživanjem na Policijskoj akademiji.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko- policijska akademija
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - The scope and quality of achieved knowledge and skills of students at police academy
T1  - Obim i kvalitet usvojenog znanja i veština studenata na Policijskoj akademiji
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
SP  - 59
EP  - 73
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_30
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Stajić, Ljubomir S. and Jovašević, Dragan and Đorđević, Đorđe and Milošević, Milan and Brković, Vladimir",
year = "2002",
abstract = "During 2001, at Police Academy in Belgrade, the research had been conducted with the defined goal to establish the scope and quality of adopted knowledge and skills by the students of this institution and, at the same time, it has immediate practical significance for their competence for carrying out entrusted jobs and tasks in the organs of interior affairs (police).It is certain that efficiency, promptness, professionalism and legality in carrying out the jobs and tasks by police officers depend, at great extent, on their professional training level. This paper analyzes the results which are obtained by the conducted research at Police Academy., Tokom 2001. godine, na Policijskoj akademiji u Beogradu sprovedeno je istraživanje sa osnovnim ciljem da se ustanove obim i kvalitet usvojenog znanja i veština studenata u toj instituciji i istovremeno njihov neposredni praktični značaj za njihovu sposobnost u obavljanju poverenih poslova i zadataka u organima unutrašnjih poslova (policiji). Sigurno je da efikasnost, odgovornost, profesionalizam i zakonitost u obavljanju poslova i zadataka policajca u mnogome zavisi od nivoa njihove profesionalne obuke. U ovom radu su analizirani rezultati dobijeni sprovedenim istraživanjem na Policijskoj akademiji.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko- policijska akademija",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "The scope and quality of achieved knowledge and skills of students at police academy, Obim i kvalitet usvojenog znanja i veština studenata na Policijskoj akademiji",
volume = "7",
number = "1",
pages = "59-73",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_30"
}

Stajić, L. S., Jovašević, D., Đorđević, Đ., Milošević, M.,& Brković, V.. (2002). The scope and quality of achieved knowledge and skills of students at police academy. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Beograd : Kriminalističko- policijska akademija., 7(1), 59-73.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_30

Stajić LS, Jovašević D, Đorđević Đ, Milošević M, Brković V. The scope and quality of achieved knowledge and skills of students at police academy. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2002;7(1):59-73.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_30 .

Stajić, Ljubomir S., Jovašević, Dragan, Đorđević, Đorđe, Milošević, Milan, Brković, Vladimir, "The scope and quality of achieved knowledge and skills of students at police academy" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 7, no. 1 (2002):59-73,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_30 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2001
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/20
AB  - Parallel to a growing significance of cultural property, there is a rise in criminality in that sphere requiring adequate reaction of criminal legislation. Most frequent and most important is the offence of theft of cultural property, which is defined in many a criminal code, including that of Serbia, as a special kind of criminal offences. The author, applying comparative method, thoroughly analyses the elements of the offence and its specificity's in terms of the concept, the act of committing it premeditation, etc.
AB  - Paralelno sa porastom značaja kulturnog vlasništva, dolazi do porasta kriminaliteta u toj oblasti što zahteva odgovarajuću reakciju krivičnog zakonodavstva. Najčešće i najznačajnije krivično delo je krađa kulturnog vlasništva koje je u većini zakonodavstava, pa i u srpskom, definisano kao posebna vrsta krivičnog dela primenjujući uporednopravni metod, autor vrši detaljnu analizu elemenata ovog krivičnog dela i njegovih karakteristika u smislu pojma, radnje izvršenja, umišljaja, itd.
T2  - Yugoslav Law
T1  - Theft of cultural property
T1  - Krađa kulturnih dobara
VL  - 28
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 25
EP  - 46
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_20
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2001",
abstract = "Parallel to a growing significance of cultural property, there is a rise in criminality in that sphere requiring adequate reaction of criminal legislation. Most frequent and most important is the offence of theft of cultural property, which is defined in many a criminal code, including that of Serbia, as a special kind of criminal offences. The author, applying comparative method, thoroughly analyses the elements of the offence and its specificity's in terms of the concept, the act of committing it premeditation, etc., Paralelno sa porastom značaja kulturnog vlasništva, dolazi do porasta kriminaliteta u toj oblasti što zahteva odgovarajuću reakciju krivičnog zakonodavstva. Najčešće i najznačajnije krivično delo je krađa kulturnog vlasništva koje je u većini zakonodavstava, pa i u srpskom, definisano kao posebna vrsta krivičnog dela primenjujući uporednopravni metod, autor vrši detaljnu analizu elemenata ovog krivičnog dela i njegovih karakteristika u smislu pojma, radnje izvršenja, umišljaja, itd.",
journal = "Yugoslav Law",
title = "Theft of cultural property, Krađa kulturnih dobara",
volume = "28",
number = "1-2",
pages = "25-46",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_20"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2001). Theft of cultural property. in Yugoslav Law, 28(1-2), 25-46.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_20

Đorđević Đ. Theft of cultural property. in Yugoslav Law. 2001;28(1-2):25-46.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_20 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Theft of cultural property" in Yugoslav Law, 28, no. 1-2 (2001):25-46,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_20 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2001
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/19
PB  - Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Menace to life and physical integrity by participating in a brawl
T1  - Ugrožavanje života i telesnog integriteta učestvovanjem u tuči
VL  - 50
IS  - 9
SP  - 73
EP  - 85
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_19
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2001",
publisher = "Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Menace to life and physical integrity by participating in a brawl, Ugrožavanje života i telesnog integriteta učestvovanjem u tuči",
volume = "50",
number = "9",
pages = "73-85",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_19"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2001). Menace to life and physical integrity by participating in a brawl. in Pravni život
Beograd : Udruženje pravnika Srbije., 50(9), 73-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_19

Đorđević Đ. Menace to life and physical integrity by participating in a brawl. in Pravni život. 2001;50(9):73-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_19 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "Menace to life and physical integrity by participating in a brawl" in Pravni život, 50, no. 9 (2001):73-85,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_19 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2001
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/16
AB  - The theft is basic crime and the crime that is usually present against property. It is shown in various forms that gave different intensity of danger; because of that the different punishment is regulated for them, from the lightest to the strongest. The theft committed by more than one person is one the more serious thefts because the danger exists in this case due to the way of committing. This form of theft is well known in the various laws, but it is determined in the different ways due to what kind of joint act is required. According to our criminal law it is necessary that more than one person-unite to commit the theft. That is the reason that is necessary to define the meaning of 'more then one person' and to fix on how many thefts and what kind of the thefts they united for. The solutions in our crime law are mostly the same as those accepted in contemporary laws, but, de lege ferenda, we should thing about some changes to make combating of these kind of theft more efficient.
AB  - Krađa je osnovno i u praksi najčešće krivično delo protiv imovine. Ono se pojavljuje u mnogobrojnim oblicima koji imaju različit intenzitet opasnosti, zbog čega su za njih propisane i veoma različite kazne u rasponu od najlakših do najtežih. Krađa učinjena od strane više lica predstavlja jedan od težih oblika krađe zbog povećane opasnosti koja postoji zbog ovakvog načina izvršenja ovog dela. Ovaj oblik krađe poznaju mnoga krivična zakonodavstva, pri čemu se u njima on odreĐuje na različite načine u zavisnosti od toga kakav se vid zajedničkog delovanja od strane više lica koja vrše krađu traži. Naše krivično zakonodavstvo propisuje da je, da bi postojao ovaj oblik krađe, potrebno da ona bude učinjena od strane više lica koja su se udružila za vršenje kraća. Stoga je neophodno odrediti pojam ,više lica, kao i utvrditi na koliko krađa i koje vrste ovo udruživanje treba da se odnosi. Naša zakonska rešenja u pogledu ovog krivičnog dela uglavnom odgovaraju rešenjima koja su u najveĆoj meri prihvaćena u savremenom krivičnom pravu, ali bi, de lege ferenda, ipak trebalo razmisliti i o nekim mogućim izmenama koje bi doprinele efikasnijem suzbijanju ovakvih krađa.
PB  - Beograd : Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - The theft committed by more than one person
T1  - Krađa učinjena od strane više lica
VL  - 43
IS  - 5
SP  - 601
EP  - 611
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_16
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2001",
abstract = "The theft is basic crime and the crime that is usually present against property. It is shown in various forms that gave different intensity of danger; because of that the different punishment is regulated for them, from the lightest to the strongest. The theft committed by more than one person is one the more serious thefts because the danger exists in this case due to the way of committing. This form of theft is well known in the various laws, but it is determined in the different ways due to what kind of joint act is required. According to our criminal law it is necessary that more than one person-unite to commit the theft. That is the reason that is necessary to define the meaning of 'more then one person' and to fix on how many thefts and what kind of the thefts they united for. The solutions in our crime law are mostly the same as those accepted in contemporary laws, but, de lege ferenda, we should thing about some changes to make combating of these kind of theft more efficient., Krađa je osnovno i u praksi najčešće krivično delo protiv imovine. Ono se pojavljuje u mnogobrojnim oblicima koji imaju različit intenzitet opasnosti, zbog čega su za njih propisane i veoma različite kazne u rasponu od najlakših do najtežih. Krađa učinjena od strane više lica predstavlja jedan od težih oblika krađe zbog povećane opasnosti koja postoji zbog ovakvog načina izvršenja ovog dela. Ovaj oblik krađe poznaju mnoga krivična zakonodavstva, pri čemu se u njima on odreĐuje na različite načine u zavisnosti od toga kakav se vid zajedničkog delovanja od strane više lica koja vrše krađu traži. Naše krivično zakonodavstvo propisuje da je, da bi postojao ovaj oblik krađe, potrebno da ona bude učinjena od strane više lica koja su se udružila za vršenje kraća. Stoga je neophodno odrediti pojam ,više lica, kao i utvrditi na koliko krađa i koje vrste ovo udruživanje treba da se odnosi. Naša zakonska rešenja u pogledu ovog krivičnog dela uglavnom odgovaraju rešenjima koja su u najveĆoj meri prihvaćena u savremenom krivičnom pravu, ali bi, de lege ferenda, ipak trebalo razmisliti i o nekim mogućim izmenama koje bi doprinele efikasnijem suzbijanju ovakvih krađa.",
publisher = "Beograd : Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "The theft committed by more than one person, Krađa učinjena od strane više lica",
volume = "43",
number = "5",
pages = "601-611",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_16"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2001). The theft committed by more than one person. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Beograd : Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije., 43(5), 601-611.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_16

Đorđević Đ. The theft committed by more than one person. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2001;43(5):601-611.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_16 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "The theft committed by more than one person" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 43, no. 5 (2001):601-611,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_16 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Đorđe
PY  - 2000
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/15
AB  - In our jurisprudence there is no unified attitude about the legal discipline where the economic delicta belong to. There are various opinions, concerned mostly to the very concept of economic delicta understanding of their legal nature and basic characteristics of the delicta. Some theoreticians these provisions categorize in the economic law some in the misdemeanors, but numerous of them find out their place in the domain of criminal law. There is doctrine according to which all economic delicta including economic misdemeanors should be separated in the special domain of criminal law. There is also a doctrine in accordance to which there should be established a widely understood legal branch including all punishable acts including economic delicta. As the most justifiable seems to be the doctrine considering this mater as separated legal domain, having in mind specific legal nature of the delicta, as well as the specific legal solutions concerning economic delicta and their perpetrators. This legal branch makes together with criminal law and law on misdemeanors the punishable law understood in broader sense of the term. Concerning the very term of the legal branch there are used various terms such as law on economic delicta, law provisions on economic delicta but the author stated that as the most acceptable solution is treating them as economic delicta law (written in Serbian language together as one word).
AB  - U našoj pravnoj teoriji ne postoji jedinstven stav o tome u koju granu prava spadaju, privredni prestupi i koje je mesto ovih propisa u pravnom sistemu naše zemlje. O tom pitanju postoje različita shvatanja, koja se najčešće vezuju za samu koncepciju privrednih prestupa, shvatanja o njihovoj pravnoj prirodi i osnovne karakteristike ovih delikata. Tako neki teoretičari ove propise svrstavaju u privredno pravo, neki u prekršajno, a brojni su oni koji im mesto pronalaze u okviru krivičnog prava. Postoji i mišljenje da sve privredne delikte, pa dakle i privredne prestupe, treba izdvojiti u posebnu granu krivičnog prava, a ima i shvatanja da mesto ovim deliktima treba tražiti u okvirima kaznenog prava shvaćenog u širem smislu kao grane prava koja obuhvata sve vrste kažnjivih dela u našem pravu. Najopravdanijim se čini ono rešenje koje ovu pravnu materiju posmatra kao posebnu granu prava, imajući u vidu specifičnu pravnu prirodu ovih delikata, kao i posebna pravna rešenja koja se u odnosu na privredne prestupe i njihove učinioce primenjuju. Ova grana prava, zajedno sa krivičnim i prekršajnim pravom, čini sastavni deo kaznenog prava shvaćenog u širem smislu reči. Što se tiče naziva ove grane prava u upotrebi su različiti termini (pravo o privrednim prestupima, privredno prestupno pravo), ali se izraz privrednoprestupno pravo (pisano kao jedna reč) čini najprikladnijim.
T2  - Jugoslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - On the place of economic delicta in legal system
T1  - O mestu propisa o privrednim prestupima u sistemu prava
VL  - 38
IS  - 3
SP  - 17
EP  - 24
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_15
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Đorđe",
year = "2000",
abstract = "In our jurisprudence there is no unified attitude about the legal discipline where the economic delicta belong to. There are various opinions, concerned mostly to the very concept of economic delicta understanding of their legal nature and basic characteristics of the delicta. Some theoreticians these provisions categorize in the economic law some in the misdemeanors, but numerous of them find out their place in the domain of criminal law. There is doctrine according to which all economic delicta including economic misdemeanors should be separated in the special domain of criminal law. There is also a doctrine in accordance to which there should be established a widely understood legal branch including all punishable acts including economic delicta. As the most justifiable seems to be the doctrine considering this mater as separated legal domain, having in mind specific legal nature of the delicta, as well as the specific legal solutions concerning economic delicta and their perpetrators. This legal branch makes together with criminal law and law on misdemeanors the punishable law understood in broader sense of the term. Concerning the very term of the legal branch there are used various terms such as law on economic delicta, law provisions on economic delicta but the author stated that as the most acceptable solution is treating them as economic delicta law (written in Serbian language together as one word)., U našoj pravnoj teoriji ne postoji jedinstven stav o tome u koju granu prava spadaju, privredni prestupi i koje je mesto ovih propisa u pravnom sistemu naše zemlje. O tom pitanju postoje različita shvatanja, koja se najčešće vezuju za samu koncepciju privrednih prestupa, shvatanja o njihovoj pravnoj prirodi i osnovne karakteristike ovih delikata. Tako neki teoretičari ove propise svrstavaju u privredno pravo, neki u prekršajno, a brojni su oni koji im mesto pronalaze u okviru krivičnog prava. Postoji i mišljenje da sve privredne delikte, pa dakle i privredne prestupe, treba izdvojiti u posebnu granu krivičnog prava, a ima i shvatanja da mesto ovim deliktima treba tražiti u okvirima kaznenog prava shvaćenog u širem smislu kao grane prava koja obuhvata sve vrste kažnjivih dela u našem pravu. Najopravdanijim se čini ono rešenje koje ovu pravnu materiju posmatra kao posebnu granu prava, imajući u vidu specifičnu pravnu prirodu ovih delikata, kao i posebna pravna rešenja koja se u odnosu na privredne prestupe i njihove učinioce primenjuju. Ova grana prava, zajedno sa krivičnim i prekršajnim pravom, čini sastavni deo kaznenog prava shvaćenog u širem smislu reči. Što se tiče naziva ove grane prava u upotrebi su različiti termini (pravo o privrednim prestupima, privredno prestupno pravo), ali se izraz privrednoprestupno pravo (pisano kao jedna reč) čini najprikladnijim.",
journal = "Jugoslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "On the place of economic delicta in legal system, O mestu propisa o privrednim prestupima u sistemu prava",
volume = "38",
number = "3",
pages = "17-24",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_15"
}

Đorđević, Đ.. (2000). On the place of economic delicta in legal system. in Jugoslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 38(3), 17-24.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_15

Đorđević Đ. On the place of economic delicta in legal system. in Jugoslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2000;38(3):17-24.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_15 .

Đorđević, Đorđe, "On the place of economic delicta in legal system" in Jugoslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 38, no. 3 (2000):17-24,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_15 .