Necessity in German criminal law
Krajnja nužda u Nemačkom pravu
Апстракт
The subject of this paper is necessity in the German Criminal Law. Special attention is given to the concept and the legal nature of necessity, terms and limits for the application of this institute in the country. An explanation has been given of the so called differentiating theory of necessity in German Criminal Law according to which there are two types of the institute: justifying and excusing. The closing part of the paper gives reasons in favor of accepting the differentiating theory in our country. The following reasons are presented. It is not appropriate to regulate in one provision: 1) the perpetration of a crime in order to save more valuable legal interest and 2) the perpetration of a crime in order to save interest having the same or smaller importance as compared to the interest which is injured or endangered. The opinion of German theories of provoked danger also favours the differentiating theory. In order to enable better understanding of the topics dealt with in this... paper, a few of court rulings from German judicial practice are considered.
U radu se razmatra pravna priroda i svrha primene krajnje nužde u nemačkom krivičnom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uslovima za primenu krajnje nužde i problemima sa kojima se suočava sudska praksa. Analizira se i odnos nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, s obzirom da je stanje nužde karakteristično za oba instituta. Takođe, obrazložena je u Nemačkoj vladajuća tzv. diferencirajuća teorija, prema kojoj postoje dve vrste krajnje nužde: opravdavajuća i izvinjavajuća. Na kraju rada je ukazano na razloge za prihvatanje ove koncepcije i u našem zakonodavstvu.
Кључне речи:
necessity / justifying / excusing / self-defence / krajnja nužda / opravdavajuća / izvinjavajuća / nužna odbranaИзвор:
Bezbednost, Beograd, 2012, 54, 3, 200-215Издавач:
- Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Развој институционалних капацитета, стандарда и процедура за супротстављање организованом криминалу и тероризму у условима међународних интеграција (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-179045)
Институција/група
JakovTY - JOUR AU - Risimović, Radosav PY - 2012 UR - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/439 AB - The subject of this paper is necessity in the German Criminal Law. Special attention is given to the concept and the legal nature of necessity, terms and limits for the application of this institute in the country. An explanation has been given of the so called differentiating theory of necessity in German Criminal Law according to which there are two types of the institute: justifying and excusing. The closing part of the paper gives reasons in favor of accepting the differentiating theory in our country. The following reasons are presented. It is not appropriate to regulate in one provision: 1) the perpetration of a crime in order to save more valuable legal interest and 2) the perpetration of a crime in order to save interest having the same or smaller importance as compared to the interest which is injured or endangered. The opinion of German theories of provoked danger also favours the differentiating theory. In order to enable better understanding of the topics dealt with in this paper, a few of court rulings from German judicial practice are considered. AB - U radu se razmatra pravna priroda i svrha primene krajnje nužde u nemačkom krivičnom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uslovima za primenu krajnje nužde i problemima sa kojima se suočava sudska praksa. Analizira se i odnos nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, s obzirom da je stanje nužde karakteristično za oba instituta. Takođe, obrazložena je u Nemačkoj vladajuća tzv. diferencirajuća teorija, prema kojoj postoje dve vrste krajnje nužde: opravdavajuća i izvinjavajuća. Na kraju rada je ukazano na razloge za prihvatanje ove koncepcije i u našem zakonodavstvu. PB - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd T2 - Bezbednost, Beograd T1 - Necessity in German criminal law T1 - Krajnja nužda u Nemačkom pravu VL - 54 IS - 3 SP - 200 EP - 215 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439 ER -
@article{ author = "Risimović, Radosav", year = "2012", abstract = "The subject of this paper is necessity in the German Criminal Law. Special attention is given to the concept and the legal nature of necessity, terms and limits for the application of this institute in the country. An explanation has been given of the so called differentiating theory of necessity in German Criminal Law according to which there are two types of the institute: justifying and excusing. The closing part of the paper gives reasons in favor of accepting the differentiating theory in our country. The following reasons are presented. It is not appropriate to regulate in one provision: 1) the perpetration of a crime in order to save more valuable legal interest and 2) the perpetration of a crime in order to save interest having the same or smaller importance as compared to the interest which is injured or endangered. The opinion of German theories of provoked danger also favours the differentiating theory. In order to enable better understanding of the topics dealt with in this paper, a few of court rulings from German judicial practice are considered., U radu se razmatra pravna priroda i svrha primene krajnje nužde u nemačkom krivičnom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uslovima za primenu krajnje nužde i problemima sa kojima se suočava sudska praksa. Analizira se i odnos nužne odbrane i krajnje nužde, s obzirom da je stanje nužde karakteristično za oba instituta. Takođe, obrazložena je u Nemačkoj vladajuća tzv. diferencirajuća teorija, prema kojoj postoje dve vrste krajnje nužde: opravdavajuća i izvinjavajuća. Na kraju rada je ukazano na razloge za prihvatanje ove koncepcije i u našem zakonodavstvu.", publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd", journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd", title = "Necessity in German criminal law, Krajnja nužda u Nemačkom pravu", volume = "54", number = "3", pages = "200-215", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439" }
Risimović, R.. (2012). Necessity in German criminal law. in Bezbednost, Beograd Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 54(3), 200-215. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439
Risimović R. Necessity in German criminal law. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2012;54(3):200-215. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439 .
Risimović, Radosav, "Necessity in German criminal law" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 54, no. 3 (2012):200-215, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_439 .