Measurement of effects in prevention of corruption

Abstract

Since the adoption of key international documents that regulate mechanisms for preventing corruption over the last two decades, there has been enough time to be able to see the experiences regarding how to measure their performance and the achieved results. Serbia has regulated these mechanisms in its legislation, so it is necessary to look at the results achieved in their implementation. It is also important to look at the results of EU member states in the implementation of these mechanisms, what difficulties they face and how they have so far sought to overcome these difficulties in order to compare those experiences with experiences in Serbia. The aim is first to point out the ways in which the results achieved in preventing corruption are monitored and, on the basis of reports from leading institutions, point to examples of good practice in preventing corruption and the obstacles that need to be addressed.

Od usvajanja ključnih međunarodnih dokumenata koji uređuju mehanizme prevencije korupcije tokom poslednje dve decenije prošlo je dovoljno vremena da bi se mogla sagledati iskustva u pogledu načina merenja njihove uspešnosti i ostvarenih rezultata. Srbija je u svom zakonodavstvu uredila te mehanizme, pa je neophodno ustanoviti kakvi su rezultati postignuti u njihovoj implementaciji. Značajno je sagledati i rezultate članica EU u implementaciji tih mehanizama, sa kakvim se teškoćama one suočavaju i na koje načine su do sada nastojale da prevaziđu te teškoće, kako bi se ta iskustva uporedila sa iskustvima u Srbiji. Cilj je da se najpre ukaže na načine kako se prate ostvareni rezultati u prevenciji korupcije i da se na osnovu izveštaja vodećih institucija ukaže na primere dobre prakse u prevenciji korupcije i prepreke koje treba otkloniti.