Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Regular sentencing

Redovno odmeravanje kazne

Thumbnail
2016
714.pdf (364.0Kb)
Authors
Risimović, Radosav
Kolarić, Dragana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The subject of this paper is regular sentencing in the Criminal Code of Serbia. In the first part of this paper, the authors will discuss the concept and types of sentencing. They will analyze the relation between the legal and court sentencing. In the second part of the paper, special attention will be paid to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances which the court takes into consideration while sentencing. These are the degree of guilt, the incentives for the offense that is committed, the degree of endangering or injurying the protected good, the circumstances under which the offense was committed, the past life of the perpetrator, his personal situation, his conduct after the commission of the 2 offense and, in particular, his relationship to the victim of the offense, as well as other circumstances related to the personality of the perpetrator. Eventually, the results of the research on sentencing will be presented in particular judgments. The authors of this paper analyzed 5...0 final court decisions of the Higher Court in Belgrade.

Predmet rada je redovno odmeravanje kazne u našem krivičnom pravu. U prvom delu rada autori će razmotriti pojam i vrste odmeravanja kazne. Analiziraće odnos zakonskog i sudskog odmeravanja kazne. U drugom delu rada će posebna pažnja biti posvećena olakšavajućim i otežavajućim okolnostima koje sud uzima u obzir pri odmeravanju kazne. To su stepen krivice, pobude iz kojih je delo učinjeno, jačina ugrožavanja ili povrede zaštićenog dobra, okolnosti pod kojima je delo učinjeno, raniji život učinioca, njegove lične prilike, njegovo držanje posle učinjenog krivičnog dela, a naročito njegov odnos prema žrtvi krivičnog dela, kao i druge okolnosti koje se odnose na ličnost učinioca. Na kraju, predstavićemo rezultate istraživanja o odmeravanju kazne u pojedinim krivičnim stvarima. Analiziraćemo 50 pravosnažnih presuda Višeg suda u Beogradu.
Keywords:
sentencing / guilt / aggravating and mitigating circumstances / odmeravanje kazne / krivica / olakšavajuće i otežavajuće okolnosti
Source:
Teme, 2016, 40, 1, 1-14
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Nišu
Funding / projects:
  • Development of Institutional Capacities, Standards and Procedures for Fighting Organized Crime and Terrorism in Climate of International Integrations (RS-179045)

ISSN: 0353-7919

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/716
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/716
AB  - The subject of this paper is regular sentencing in the Criminal Code of Serbia. In the first part of this paper, the authors will discuss the concept and types of sentencing. They will analyze the relation between the legal and court sentencing. In the second part of the paper, special attention will be paid to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances which the court takes into consideration while sentencing. These are the degree of guilt, the incentives for the offense that is committed, the degree of endangering or injurying the protected good, the circumstances under which the offense was committed, the past life of the perpetrator, his personal situation, his conduct after the commission of the 2 offense and, in particular, his relationship to the victim of the offense, as well as other circumstances related to the personality of the perpetrator. Eventually, the results of the research on sentencing will be presented in particular judgments. The authors of this paper analyzed 50 final court decisions of the Higher Court in Belgrade.
AB  - Predmet rada je redovno odmeravanje kazne u našem krivičnom pravu. U prvom delu rada autori će razmotriti pojam i vrste odmeravanja kazne. Analiziraće odnos zakonskog i sudskog odmeravanja kazne. U drugom delu rada će posebna pažnja biti posvećena olakšavajućim i otežavajućim okolnostima koje sud uzima u obzir pri odmeravanju kazne. To su stepen krivice, pobude iz kojih je delo učinjeno, jačina ugrožavanja ili povrede zaštićenog dobra, okolnosti pod kojima je delo učinjeno, raniji život učinioca, njegove lične prilike, njegovo držanje posle učinjenog krivičnog dela, a naročito njegov odnos prema žrtvi krivičnog dela, kao i druge okolnosti koje se odnose na ličnost učinioca. Na kraju, predstavićemo rezultate istraživanja o odmeravanju kazne u pojedinim krivičnim stvarima. Analiziraćemo 50 pravosnažnih presuda Višeg suda u Beogradu.
PB  - Univerzitet u Nišu
T2  - Teme
T1  - Regular sentencing
T1  - Redovno odmeravanje kazne
VL  - 40
IS  - 1
SP  - 1
EP  - 14
UR  - conv_101
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav and Kolarić, Dragana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is regular sentencing in the Criminal Code of Serbia. In the first part of this paper, the authors will discuss the concept and types of sentencing. They will analyze the relation between the legal and court sentencing. In the second part of the paper, special attention will be paid to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances which the court takes into consideration while sentencing. These are the degree of guilt, the incentives for the offense that is committed, the degree of endangering or injurying the protected good, the circumstances under which the offense was committed, the past life of the perpetrator, his personal situation, his conduct after the commission of the 2 offense and, in particular, his relationship to the victim of the offense, as well as other circumstances related to the personality of the perpetrator. Eventually, the results of the research on sentencing will be presented in particular judgments. The authors of this paper analyzed 50 final court decisions of the Higher Court in Belgrade., Predmet rada je redovno odmeravanje kazne u našem krivičnom pravu. U prvom delu rada autori će razmotriti pojam i vrste odmeravanja kazne. Analiziraće odnos zakonskog i sudskog odmeravanja kazne. U drugom delu rada će posebna pažnja biti posvećena olakšavajućim i otežavajućim okolnostima koje sud uzima u obzir pri odmeravanju kazne. To su stepen krivice, pobude iz kojih je delo učinjeno, jačina ugrožavanja ili povrede zaštićenog dobra, okolnosti pod kojima je delo učinjeno, raniji život učinioca, njegove lične prilike, njegovo držanje posle učinjenog krivičnog dela, a naročito njegov odnos prema žrtvi krivičnog dela, kao i druge okolnosti koje se odnose na ličnost učinioca. Na kraju, predstavićemo rezultate istraživanja o odmeravanju kazne u pojedinim krivičnim stvarima. Analiziraćemo 50 pravosnažnih presuda Višeg suda u Beogradu.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Nišu",
journal = "Teme",
title = "Regular sentencing, Redovno odmeravanje kazne",
volume = "40",
number = "1",
pages = "1-14",
url = "conv_101"
}
Risimović, R.,& Kolarić, D.. (2016). Regular sentencing. in Teme
Univerzitet u Nišu., 40(1), 1-14.
conv_101
Risimović R, Kolarić D. Regular sentencing. in Teme. 2016;40(1):1-14.
conv_101 .
Risimović, Radosav, Kolarić, Dragana, "Regular sentencing" in Teme, 40, no. 1 (2016):1-14,
conv_101 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB