Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis

Privatizacija kažnjavanja - način za prevazilaženje ili produbljivanje krize zatvaranja

Thumbnail
2010
319.pdf (444.0Kb)
Authors
Kesić, Zoran
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Ever since it has been established the sentence of imprisonment has been disputed many times. The rise of recidivist crimes has only confirmed the limited power of imprisonment and the failure of the idea of resocialization which has also conditioned the reexamining of both the punishment and the manner of its implementation. In an attempt to modify the sentence of imprisonment many countries have started to include private sector in its implementation, while in some countries the governments have gone so far as to give the charge of penal facilities to private companies. It is this form of privatization of punishment that arouses the highest controversy in expert public as well as its actual implementation and this is why the special attention should be given to its description.
Od svog nastanka do danas kazna zatvora se suočavala sa brojnim osporavanjima. Porast kriminaliteta izvršenog u povratku samo je potvrdio ograničenu moć zatvaranja i neuspeh ideje resocijalizacije, što je uslovilo preispitivanje kako same kazne tako i načina njenog izvršenja. Nastojeći da modifikuju kaznu zatvora brojne zemlje u njeno sprovođenje počinju uključivati privatni sektor, dok je u nekim zemljama državno rukovodstvo otišlo toliko daleko da privatnim kompanijama poveravaju upravljanje kaznenim ustanovama. Upravo ovaj oblik privatizacije kažnjavanja stvara najveće kontroverze u stručnoj javnosti i sprovođenju na terenu zbog čega njegovom opisivanju treba posvetiti posebnu pažnju.
Keywords:
crime control / imprisonment / prison / crisis of imprisonment / privatization / kontrola kriminaliteta / kazna zatvora / kaznena ustanova / kriza zatvaranja / privatizacija
Source:
Strani pravni život, 2010, 1, 303-320
Publisher:
  • Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd

ISSN: 0039-2138

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/321
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kesić, Zoran
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/321
AB  - Ever since it has been established the sentence of imprisonment has been disputed many times. The rise of recidivist crimes has only confirmed the limited power of imprisonment and the failure of the idea of resocialization which has also conditioned the reexamining of both the punishment and the manner of its implementation. In an attempt to modify the sentence of imprisonment many countries have started to include private sector in its implementation, while in some countries the governments have gone so far as to give the charge of penal facilities to private companies. It is this form of privatization of punishment that arouses the highest controversy in expert public as well as its actual implementation and this is why the special attention should be given to its description.
AB  - Od svog nastanka do danas kazna zatvora se suočavala sa brojnim osporavanjima. Porast kriminaliteta izvršenog u povratku samo je potvrdio ograničenu moć zatvaranja i neuspeh ideje resocijalizacije, što je uslovilo preispitivanje kako same kazne tako i načina njenog izvršenja. Nastojeći da modifikuju kaznu zatvora brojne zemlje u njeno sprovođenje počinju uključivati privatni sektor, dok je u nekim zemljama državno rukovodstvo otišlo toliko daleko da privatnim kompanijama poveravaju upravljanje kaznenim ustanovama. Upravo ovaj oblik privatizacije kažnjavanja stvara najveće kontroverze u stručnoj javnosti i sprovođenju na terenu zbog čega njegovom opisivanju treba posvetiti posebnu pažnju.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis
T1  - Privatizacija kažnjavanja - način za prevazilaženje ili produbljivanje krize zatvaranja
IS  - 1
SP  - 303
EP  - 320
UR  - conv_148
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kesić, Zoran",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Ever since it has been established the sentence of imprisonment has been disputed many times. The rise of recidivist crimes has only confirmed the limited power of imprisonment and the failure of the idea of resocialization which has also conditioned the reexamining of both the punishment and the manner of its implementation. In an attempt to modify the sentence of imprisonment many countries have started to include private sector in its implementation, while in some countries the governments have gone so far as to give the charge of penal facilities to private companies. It is this form of privatization of punishment that arouses the highest controversy in expert public as well as its actual implementation and this is why the special attention should be given to its description., Od svog nastanka do danas kazna zatvora se suočavala sa brojnim osporavanjima. Porast kriminaliteta izvršenog u povratku samo je potvrdio ograničenu moć zatvaranja i neuspeh ideje resocijalizacije, što je uslovilo preispitivanje kako same kazne tako i načina njenog izvršenja. Nastojeći da modifikuju kaznu zatvora brojne zemlje u njeno sprovođenje počinju uključivati privatni sektor, dok je u nekim zemljama državno rukovodstvo otišlo toliko daleko da privatnim kompanijama poveravaju upravljanje kaznenim ustanovama. Upravo ovaj oblik privatizacije kažnjavanja stvara najveće kontroverze u stručnoj javnosti i sprovođenju na terenu zbog čega njegovom opisivanju treba posvetiti posebnu pažnju.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis, Privatizacija kažnjavanja - način za prevazilaženje ili produbljivanje krize zatvaranja",
number = "1",
pages = "303-320",
url = "conv_148"
}
Kesić, Z.. (2010). Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(1), 303-320.
conv_148
Kesić Z. Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis. in Strani pravni život. 2010;(1):303-320.
conv_148 .
Kesić, Zoran, "Privatization of punishing: Method for overcoming or deepening the detention crisis" in Strani pravni život, no. 1 (2010):303-320,
conv_148 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB