Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Misconduct in office

Zloupotreba službenog položaja

Thumbnail
2010
315.pdf (228.9Kb)
Authors
Risimović, Radosav
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The subject of this paper is legal description of misconduct in office in our criminal legislation. Related to the very subject, we believe it is necessary to change the Criminal Code in the sense of narrowing the group of persons that could appear as perpetrators. Consistent implementation of legality and legal security principles requires the regulations according to which only legal person can realize this offence. The idea of necessity to erase this criminal act from the Criminal Code (because of lack of definition of alternatively regulated execution act) is not justified for two interdependent reasons: first, the existence of common criminal act does not impede the punishment for special offences, on condition that all conditions anticipated by the law are fulfilled (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Second, disregarding efforts made by the legislator, it is not realistic to expect every single procedure pointed against official duty to be regulated as criminal act. This crim...inal act is executed at the moment of performing the forbidden consequence, that is, when perpetrator obtains any benefit for himself or other physical or legal person by committed action, causes any damage, or seriously violates another person's rights. When it comes to establishing benefits, damages, or violation of people's right, we believe that it is necessary to use only objective criteria, although our literature at some points supports opposite standpoints. Comparative legal analysis of criminal acts against public administration in the Spanish Criminal Code points at the fact that in this country another concept of criminal acts regulation is accepted.

Predmet rada je zakonski opis krivičnog dela zloupotrebe službenog položaja u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. U pogledu subjekta ovog dela, autor će izneti razloge u prilog izmene Krivičnog zakonika, što bi vodilo sužavanju kruga lica koja se mogu pojaviti kao učinioci. Sa druge strane, biće obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem pojedinih pisaca koji, uzimajući u obzir neodređenost alternativno propisane radnje izvršenja, predlažu brisanje ovog krivičnog dela iz Krivičnog zakonika. Deo rada posvećen je kriterijumima za utvrđivanju posledice, tj. odgovoru na pitanje šta se u smislu člana 359. stav 1. može smatrati pribavljanjem koristi, nanošenjem štete ili težom povredom prava drugog. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uporedno-pravnoj analizi krivičnih dela protiv javne uprave u španskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu.
Keywords:
zloupotreba / službena dužnost / arbitrarnost / službeno lice / odgovorno lice / umišljaj
Source:
Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 2010, 15, 1, 127-140
Publisher:
  • Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd

ISSN: 0354-8872

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/317
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Risimović, Radosav
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/317
AB  - The subject of this paper is legal description of misconduct in office in our criminal legislation. Related to the very subject, we believe it is necessary to change the Criminal Code in the sense of narrowing the group of persons that could appear as perpetrators. Consistent implementation of legality and legal security principles requires the regulations according to which only legal person can realize this offence. The idea of necessity to erase this criminal act from the Criminal Code (because of lack of definition of alternatively regulated execution act) is not justified for two interdependent reasons: first, the existence of common criminal act does not impede the punishment for special offences, on condition that all conditions anticipated by the law are fulfilled (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Second, disregarding efforts made by the legislator, it is not realistic to expect every single procedure pointed against official duty to be regulated as criminal act. This criminal act is executed at the moment of performing the forbidden consequence, that is, when perpetrator obtains any benefit for himself or other physical or legal person by committed action, causes any damage, or seriously violates another person's rights. When it comes to establishing benefits, damages, or violation of people's right, we believe that it is necessary to use only objective criteria, although our literature at some points supports opposite standpoints. Comparative legal analysis of criminal acts against public administration in the Spanish Criminal Code points at the fact that in this country another concept of criminal acts regulation is accepted.
AB  - Predmet rada je zakonski opis krivičnog dela zloupotrebe službenog položaja u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. U pogledu subjekta ovog dela, autor će izneti razloge u prilog izmene Krivičnog zakonika, što bi vodilo sužavanju kruga lica koja se mogu pojaviti kao učinioci. Sa druge strane, biće obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem pojedinih pisaca koji, uzimajući u obzir neodređenost alternativno propisane radnje izvršenja, predlažu brisanje ovog krivičnog dela iz Krivičnog zakonika. Deo rada posvećen je kriterijumima za utvrđivanju posledice, tj. odgovoru na pitanje šta se u smislu člana 359. stav 1. može smatrati pribavljanjem koristi, nanošenjem štete ili težom povredom prava drugog. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uporedno-pravnoj analizi krivičnih dela protiv javne uprave u španskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu.
PB  - Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd
T2  - Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Misconduct in office
T1  - Zloupotreba službenog položaja
VL  - 15
IS  - 1
SP  - 127
EP  - 140
UR  - conv_402
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Risimović, Radosav",
year = "2010",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is legal description of misconduct in office in our criminal legislation. Related to the very subject, we believe it is necessary to change the Criminal Code in the sense of narrowing the group of persons that could appear as perpetrators. Consistent implementation of legality and legal security principles requires the regulations according to which only legal person can realize this offence. The idea of necessity to erase this criminal act from the Criminal Code (because of lack of definition of alternatively regulated execution act) is not justified for two interdependent reasons: first, the existence of common criminal act does not impede the punishment for special offences, on condition that all conditions anticipated by the law are fulfilled (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Second, disregarding efforts made by the legislator, it is not realistic to expect every single procedure pointed against official duty to be regulated as criminal act. This criminal act is executed at the moment of performing the forbidden consequence, that is, when perpetrator obtains any benefit for himself or other physical or legal person by committed action, causes any damage, or seriously violates another person's rights. When it comes to establishing benefits, damages, or violation of people's right, we believe that it is necessary to use only objective criteria, although our literature at some points supports opposite standpoints. Comparative legal analysis of criminal acts against public administration in the Spanish Criminal Code points at the fact that in this country another concept of criminal acts regulation is accepted., Predmet rada je zakonski opis krivičnog dela zloupotrebe službenog položaja u našem krivičnom zakonodavstvu. U pogledu subjekta ovog dela, autor će izneti razloge u prilog izmene Krivičnog zakonika, što bi vodilo sužavanju kruga lica koja se mogu pojaviti kao učinioci. Sa druge strane, biće obrazloženo neslaganje sa stanovištem pojedinih pisaca koji, uzimajući u obzir neodređenost alternativno propisane radnje izvršenja, predlažu brisanje ovog krivičnog dela iz Krivičnog zakonika. Deo rada posvećen je kriterijumima za utvrđivanju posledice, tj. odgovoru na pitanje šta se u smislu člana 359. stav 1. može smatrati pribavljanjem koristi, nanošenjem štete ili težom povredom prava drugog. Posebna pažnja posvećena je uporedno-pravnoj analizi krivičnih dela protiv javne uprave u španskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd",
journal = "Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Misconduct in office, Zloupotreba službenog položaja",
volume = "15",
number = "1",
pages = "127-140",
url = "conv_402"
}
Risimović, R.. (2010). Misconduct in office. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd., 15(1), 127-140.
conv_402
Risimović R. Misconduct in office. in Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2010;15(1):127-140.
conv_402 .
Risimović, Radosav, "Misconduct in office" in Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 15, no. 1 (2010):127-140,
conv_402 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB