Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards

Aktuelne pravne i kriminalističke mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka – komparativna analiza standarda u Nemačkoj i Srbiji

Thumbnail
2020
bitstream_5744.pdf (1.931Mb)
Authors
Tasić, Marija
Straub, Thomas
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The topic of the paper is comparative scientific research analyzing the possibilities in eyewitness identification procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of Serbia, because of the fact that identification is one of the proving actions used in both states. In this paper, what will be considered is the advantages and disadvantages of identification procedures in these states, in order to propose an optimal procedure that would be equally objective and effective both for the witnesses and the suspect. Beside similarities in the implementation of the identification procedure in both states, there are some differences that are essentially based on normative rules, which regulate whether the police have the original authority to carry out this action or whether the authorization of a public prosecutor is required. Also, there are differences in forming the identification lineup and photo array, especially in terms of the number of people or photographs that ...should be presented to the eyewitness along with the suspect. The scientific justification of this paper is reflected in the fact that eyewitness identification requires clear standards for implementation, so there is a need to create adequate preconditions for using this proving action in criminal proceedings, especially in cases where there is a lack of material evidence.

Predmet rada je komparativna naučna analiza mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj i Republici Srbiji, zbog činjenice da prepoznavanje predstavlja jednu od dokaznih radnji u obe države. U radu će biti razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci postupka prepoznavanja u ovim državama, u cilju utvrđivanja optimalnog postupka koji bi podjednako bio efektivan i objektivan za svedoke i za osumnjičenog. Iako postoje sličnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja, javljaju se i pojedine razlike koje suštinski proističu iz normativnih pravila kojima se utvrđuje da li policija ima izvorno ovlašćenje da sprovede ovu radnju ili je potrebna autorizacija od strane tužioca. Takođe, razlike su primetne i u pogledu načina formiranja linije za prepoznavanje i foto albuma, naročito u pogledu broja lica ili fotografija koje će biti predočene svedoku, zajedno sa osumnjičenim. Naučna opravdanost rada ogleda se u činjenici da je neophodno postojanje jasnih stand...arda u sprovođenju radnje prepoznavanja, te postoji i potreba za uspostavljanjem adekvatnih preduslova kako bi se ova radnja mogla koristiti u krivičnom postupku, naročito u slučajevima koje odlikuje nedostatatak materijalnih dokaza.

Keywords:
identification / eyewitness / procedural provisions / criminalistics methods / prepoznavanje / svedoci / procesne odredbe / kriminalistiĉke metode
Source:
Безбедност, 2020, 62, 2, 141-156
Publisher:
  • Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије
Funding / projects:
  • Development of Institutional Capacities, Standards and Procedures for Fighting Organized Crime and Terrorism in Climate of International Integrations (RS-179045)

DOI: 10.5937/bezbednost2002141T

ISSN: 0409-2953

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1307
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tasić, Marija
AU  - Straub, Thomas
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1307
AB  - The topic of the paper is comparative scientific
research analyzing the possibilities in eyewitness identification
procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of
Serbia, because of the fact that identification is one of the proving
actions used in both states. In this paper, what will be considered is
the advantages and disadvantages of identification procedures in these
states, in order to propose an optimal procedure that would be equally
objective and effective both for the witnesses and the suspect.
Beside similarities in the implementation of the identification
procedure in both states, there are some differences that are
essentially based on normative rules, which regulate whether the
police have the original authority to carry out this action or whether
the authorization of a public prosecutor is required. Also, there are
differences in forming the identification lineup and photo array,
especially in terms of the number of people or photographs that should
be presented to the eyewitness along with the suspect.
The scientific justification of this paper is reflected in the fact
that eyewitness identification requires clear standards for
implementation, so there is a need to create adequate preconditions for using this proving action in criminal proceedings, especially in
cases where there is a lack of material evidence.
AB  - Predmet rada je komparativna naučna analiza mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj i Republici Srbiji, zbog činjenice da prepoznavanje predstavlja jednu od dokaznih radnji u obe države. U radu će biti razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci postupka prepoznavanja u ovim državama, u cilju utvrđivanja optimalnog postupka koji bi podjednako bio efektivan i objektivan za svedoke i za osumnjičenog. Iako postoje sličnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja, javljaju se i pojedine razlike koje suštinski proističu iz normativnih pravila kojima se utvrđuje da li policija ima izvorno ovlašćenje da sprovede ovu radnju ili je potrebna autorizacija od strane tužioca. Takođe, razlike su primetne i u pogledu načina formiranja linije za prepoznavanje i foto albuma, naročito u pogledu broja lica ili fotografija koje će biti predočene svedoku, zajedno sa osumnjičenim. Naučna opravdanost rada ogleda se u činjenici da je neophodno postojanje jasnih standarda u sprovođenju radnje prepoznavanja, te postoji i potreba za uspostavljanjem adekvatnih preduslova kako bi se ova radnja mogla koristiti u krivičnom postupku, naročito u slučajevima koje odlikuje nedostatatak materijalnih dokaza.
PB  - Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије
T2  - Безбедност
T1  - Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards
T1  - Aktuelne pravne i kriminalističke mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka – komparativna analiza standarda u Nemačkoj i Srbiji
VL  - 62
IS  - 2
SP  - 141
EP  - 156
DO  - 10.5937/bezbednost2002141T
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Tasić, Marija and Straub, Thomas",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The topic of the paper is comparative scientific
research analyzing the possibilities in eyewitness identification
procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of
Serbia, because of the fact that identification is one of the proving
actions used in both states. In this paper, what will be considered is
the advantages and disadvantages of identification procedures in these
states, in order to propose an optimal procedure that would be equally
objective and effective both for the witnesses and the suspect.
Beside similarities in the implementation of the identification
procedure in both states, there are some differences that are
essentially based on normative rules, which regulate whether the
police have the original authority to carry out this action or whether
the authorization of a public prosecutor is required. Also, there are
differences in forming the identification lineup and photo array,
especially in terms of the number of people or photographs that should
be presented to the eyewitness along with the suspect.
The scientific justification of this paper is reflected in the fact
that eyewitness identification requires clear standards for
implementation, so there is a need to create adequate preconditions for using this proving action in criminal proceedings, especially in
cases where there is a lack of material evidence., Predmet rada je komparativna naučna analiza mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj i Republici Srbiji, zbog činjenice da prepoznavanje predstavlja jednu od dokaznih radnji u obe države. U radu će biti razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci postupka prepoznavanja u ovim državama, u cilju utvrđivanja optimalnog postupka koji bi podjednako bio efektivan i objektivan za svedoke i za osumnjičenog. Iako postoje sličnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja, javljaju se i pojedine razlike koje suštinski proističu iz normativnih pravila kojima se utvrđuje da li policija ima izvorno ovlašćenje da sprovede ovu radnju ili je potrebna autorizacija od strane tužioca. Takođe, razlike su primetne i u pogledu načina formiranja linije za prepoznavanje i foto albuma, naročito u pogledu broja lica ili fotografija koje će biti predočene svedoku, zajedno sa osumnjičenim. Naučna opravdanost rada ogleda se u činjenici da je neophodno postojanje jasnih standarda u sprovođenju radnje prepoznavanja, te postoji i potreba za uspostavljanjem adekvatnih preduslova kako bi se ova radnja mogla koristiti u krivičnom postupku, naročito u slučajevima koje odlikuje nedostatatak materijalnih dokaza.",
publisher = "Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије",
journal = "Безбедност",
title = "Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards, Aktuelne pravne i kriminalističke mogućnosti u sprovođenju postupka prepoznavanja od strane svedoka – komparativna analiza standarda u Nemačkoj i Srbiji",
volume = "62",
number = "2",
pages = "141-156",
doi = "10.5937/bezbednost2002141T"
}
Tasić, M.,& Straub, T.. (2020). Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards. in Безбедност
Београд : Министарство унутрашњих послова Републике Србије., 62(2), 141-156.
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2002141T
Tasić M, Straub T. Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards. in Безбедност. 2020;62(2):141-156.
doi:10.5937/bezbednost2002141T .
Tasić, Marija, Straub, Thomas, "Current legal and criminalistics possibilities in eyewitness identification procedure – a comparative analysis of German and Serbian standards" in Безбедност, 62, no. 2 (2020):141-156,
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2002141T . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB