Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrilic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Uvođenje vanrednog stanja prema Ustavu Republike Srbije iz 2006. godine

Declaration of state of emergency according to 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia

Thumbnail
2010
bitstream_4849.pdf (171.8Kb)
Authors
Avramović, Dragutin
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Vanredno stanje predstavlja neredovnu, izuzetnu situaciju u kojoj se mogu naći i najdemokratskije države. U takvim okolnostima obično se poziva na staro pravilo da je spas naroda (države) najviši zakon. Ipak, s obzirom na to da je tada, zbog višeg razloga (opstanak države), neophodan izvestan stepen koncentracije vlasti u rukama egzekutive, što neminovno otvara mogućnost zloupotreba, ustavotvorci moraju biti vrlo pažljivi prilikom normiranja ovako osetljivog pitanja. Centralni deo rada ukazuje na prednosti i mane sadašnjeg ustavnog rešenja u Srbiji, prvenstveno u odnosu na način uvođenja vanrednog stanja postavljen u Ustavu Srbije iz 1990. godine. U nekadašnjem srpskom ustavu predsednik Republike je bio ovlašćen za donošenje odluke o vanrednom stanju, što je danas u nadležnosti Narodne skupštine, koja je nesumnjivo najpotpuniji i najbolji reprezent narodne volje. Međutim, pitanje efikasnosti odlučivanja i brzine reagovanja u toj delikatnoj stvari i dalje ostaje sporno. Pore...d izvesnih nedoslednosti, pa čak možda i omaški, postojeći Ustav Republike Srbije iz 2006. godine ipak u osnovi pokazuje demokratska nastojanja da se donošenje odluke o uvođenju vanrednog stanja višestruko osigura, a pogotovo da se u vreme važenja vanrednog stanja u potpunosti poštuju ljudska prava u skladu sa preuzetim međunarodnim obavezama.

State of emergency marks an irregular, exceptional situation, which potentially may hit the most democratic countries as well. Since ancient times, under those circumstances, the rule salus populi suprema lex (safety of the people is supreme demand) is applied and used as an excuse. However, as under those circumstances a kind of concentration of power within the executive branch is unavoidable, there is a need to have very cautiously measured constitutional norms regulating that balance. The main goal of this paper is to examine advantages and shortcomings of the current regulation of that issue in Serbia according to the 2006 Constitution, particularly in connection with the previous, 1990 Constitution and the experience of introducing state of emergency in the country. According to the previous Serbian Constitution, President of the Republic was engaged to introduce the state of emergency, while according to the current one, that decision was moved into hands of the Nati...onal Assembly – which is undeniably the best and the most prominent representative of the will of the people. However, the issue of efficiency and properly quick reaction is at stake. Although the existing 2006 Constitution has some inconsistencies, and even more some omissions, it basically reflects democratic tendencies to secure in many ways the decision on emergency state introduction, and particularly to ensure respect of the human rights during the state of emergency in compliance with the established international obligations.

Keywords:
vanredno stanje / Odluka o proglašenju vanrednog stanja / Ustav Republike Srbije iz 2006. godine / Ustav Republike Srbije iz 1990. godine
Source:
NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 2010, 15, 2, 127-135
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija

ISSN: 0354-8872

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1148
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Avramović, Dragutin
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1148
AB  - Vanredno stanje predstavlja neredovnu, izuzetnu situaciju u kojoj se
mogu naći i najdemokratskije države. U takvim okolnostima obično se poziva na
staro pravilo da je spas naroda (države) najviši zakon. Ipak, s obzirom na to da je
tada, zbog višeg razloga (opstanak države), neophodan izvestan stepen
koncentracije vlasti u rukama egzekutive, što neminovno otvara mogućnost
zloupotreba, ustavotvorci moraju biti vrlo pažljivi prilikom normiranja ovako
osetljivog pitanja. Centralni deo rada ukazuje na prednosti i mane sadašnjeg
ustavnog rešenja u Srbiji, prvenstveno u odnosu na način uvođenja vanrednog
stanja postavljen u Ustavu Srbije iz 1990. godine. U nekadašnjem srpskom ustavu
predsednik Republike je bio ovlašćen za donošenje odluke o vanrednom stanju,
što je danas u nadležnosti Narodne skupštine, koja je nesumnjivo najpotpuniji i
najbolji reprezent narodne volje. Međutim, pitanje efikasnosti odlučivanja i brzine
reagovanja u toj delikatnoj stvari i dalje ostaje sporno. Pored izvesnih
nedoslednosti, pa čak možda i omaški, postojeći Ustav Republike Srbije iz 2006.
godine ipak u osnovi pokazuje demokratska nastojanja da se donošenje odluke o
uvođenju vanrednog stanja višestruko osigura, a pogotovo da se u vreme važenja
vanrednog stanja u potpunosti poštuju ljudska prava u skladu sa preuzetim
međunarodnim obavezama.
AB  - State of emergency marks an irregular, exceptional situation, which potentially
may hit the most democratic countries as well. Since ancient times, under those
circumstances, the rule salus populi suprema lex (safety of the people is supreme
demand) is applied and used as an excuse. However, as under those circumstances
a kind of concentration of power within the executive branch is unavoidable, there
is a need to have very cautiously measured constitutional norms regulating that
balance. The main goal of this paper is to examine advantages and shortcomings
of the current regulation of that issue in Serbia according to the 2006 Constitution,
particularly in connection with the previous, 1990 Constitution and the
experience of introducing state of emergency in the country. According to the
previous Serbian Constitution, President of the Republic was engaged to
introduce the state of emergency, while according to the current one, that decision
was moved into hands of the National Assembly – which is undeniably the best
and the most prominent representative of the will of the people. However, the
issue of efficiency and properly quick reaction is at stake. Although the existing
2006 Constitution has some inconsistencies, and even more some omissions, it
basically reflects democratic tendencies to secure in many ways the decision on
emergency state introduction, and particularly to ensure respect of the human
rights during the state of emergency in compliance with the established
international obligations.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
T2  - NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - Uvođenje vanrednog stanja prema Ustavu Republike Srbije iz 2006. godine
T1  - Declaration of state of emergency according to 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia
VL  - 15
IS  - 2
SP  - 127
EP  - 135
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Avramović, Dragutin",
year = "2010",
url = "http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1148",
abstract = "Vanredno stanje predstavlja neredovnu, izuzetnu situaciju u kojoj se
mogu naći i najdemokratskije države. U takvim okolnostima obično se poziva na
staro pravilo da je spas naroda (države) najviši zakon. Ipak, s obzirom na to da je
tada, zbog višeg razloga (opstanak države), neophodan izvestan stepen
koncentracije vlasti u rukama egzekutive, što neminovno otvara mogućnost
zloupotreba, ustavotvorci moraju biti vrlo pažljivi prilikom normiranja ovako
osetljivog pitanja. Centralni deo rada ukazuje na prednosti i mane sadašnjeg
ustavnog rešenja u Srbiji, prvenstveno u odnosu na način uvođenja vanrednog
stanja postavljen u Ustavu Srbije iz 1990. godine. U nekadašnjem srpskom ustavu
predsednik Republike je bio ovlašćen za donošenje odluke o vanrednom stanju,
što je danas u nadležnosti Narodne skupštine, koja je nesumnjivo najpotpuniji i
najbolji reprezent narodne volje. Međutim, pitanje efikasnosti odlučivanja i brzine
reagovanja u toj delikatnoj stvari i dalje ostaje sporno. Pored izvesnih
nedoslednosti, pa čak možda i omaški, postojeći Ustav Republike Srbije iz 2006.
godine ipak u osnovi pokazuje demokratska nastojanja da se donošenje odluke o
uvođenju vanrednog stanja višestruko osigura, a pogotovo da se u vreme važenja
vanrednog stanja u potpunosti poštuju ljudska prava u skladu sa preuzetim
međunarodnim obavezama., State of emergency marks an irregular, exceptional situation, which potentially
may hit the most democratic countries as well. Since ancient times, under those
circumstances, the rule salus populi suprema lex (safety of the people is supreme
demand) is applied and used as an excuse. However, as under those circumstances
a kind of concentration of power within the executive branch is unavoidable, there
is a need to have very cautiously measured constitutional norms regulating that
balance. The main goal of this paper is to examine advantages and shortcomings
of the current regulation of that issue in Serbia according to the 2006 Constitution,
particularly in connection with the previous, 1990 Constitution and the
experience of introducing state of emergency in the country. According to the
previous Serbian Constitution, President of the Republic was engaged to
introduce the state of emergency, while according to the current one, that decision
was moved into hands of the National Assembly – which is undeniably the best
and the most prominent representative of the will of the people. However, the
issue of efficiency and properly quick reaction is at stake. Although the existing
2006 Constitution has some inconsistencies, and even more some omissions, it
basically reflects democratic tendencies to secure in many ways the decision on
emergency state introduction, and particularly to ensure respect of the human
rights during the state of emergency in compliance with the established
international obligations.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija",
journal = "NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "Uvođenje vanrednog stanja prema Ustavu Republike Srbije iz 2006. godine, Declaration of state of emergency according to 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia",
volume = "15",
number = "2",
pages = "127-135"
}
Avramović D. Declaration of state of emergency according to 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2010;15(2):127-135
Avramović, D. (2010). Declaration of state of emergency according to 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia.
NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravoBeograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija., 15(2), 127-135.
Avramović Dragutin, "Declaration of state of emergency according to 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia" 15, no. 2 (2010):127-135

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies in Belgrade | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutionsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies in Belgrade | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB