Jakov - Repository of the University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   Jakov
  • Jakov
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Expanding Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts : coherence or chaos

Proširenje nadležnosti međunarodnih krivičnih sudova : koherentnost ili haos

Thumbnail
2016
bitstream_4760.pdf (115.5Kb)
Authors
Šurlan, Tijana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Within the present paper a new phenomenon has been elaborated - a phenomenon of expanding jurisdiction of the present international criminal courts. At the moment there are two ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals, one permanent International Criminal Court and several hybrid and internationalized international criminal courts. Ad hoc Tribunals are in the phase of transformation into the UN Mechanism for the International Criminal Tribunals, as a completely new forum, thus expanding Tribunals jurisdiction in a new direction. As for the International Criminal Court, desirable mode of its expanding is through the increase of its member states, in the overall list of member-states. What is happening in reality is that states are approaching ad hoc at the ICC’s docket, as the situation directs them. Tendency in the realm of the international criminal judiciary is that creation of new international criminal courts is expected, although not warmly accepted. With the multiple... international criminal courts existing, in the same ratione materiae jurisdiction, it is highly expected that the overlaps will occur as well as the expanding of the jurisdiction that is beyond the usual terms of norms interpretation. The focus of this paper is on a dilemma – whether such a situation will provoke coherence or chaos.

Naslovljeni rad bavi se jednim novim fenomenom – fenomenom proširivanja nadležnosti postojećih međunarodnih krivičnih sudova. Trenutno postoje dva ad hoc Međunarodna krivična tribunala, jedan stalni Međunarodni krivični sud i nekoliko hibridnih i internacionalizovanih međunarodnih krivičnih sudova. Ad hoc tribunali trenutno su u fazi transformacije i prenošenja nadležnosti na UN Mehanizam za međunarodne krivične tribunale. Što se tiče stalnog Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, poželjan model proširivanja domašaja rada ovog Suda je kroz uvećanje država članica njegovog Statuta. No što se trenutno dešava je uvećavanje nadležnosti nekim drugačijim pravnim sredstvima, a ne uobičajenim i poželjnim članstvom u Sudu. Opšta tendencija u domenu međunarodnog krivičnog pravosuđa ogleda se u uvećanom kreiranju novih sudova, iako ta tendencija nije ubedljivo prihvaćena kao dobrodošla. Umnožavanje broja međunarodnih sudova, sa istom ratione materiae nadležnošću, jasno je da može dovesti do... preklapanja u postupanju. S druge strane dovodi do proširivanja nadležnosti po drugim principima određivanja nadležnosti. Stoga fokus ovog rada i jeste usmeren ka razrešenju dileme – da li opisana situacija kreira stanje koherentnosti ili haosa.

Keywords:
Jurisdiction, Expanding / ad hoc International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia / ad hoc International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda / UN Mechanism for the International Criminal Tribunals / International Criminal Court / nadležnost, proširivanje / ad hoc Međunarodni krivični tribunal za bivšu Jugoslaviju / ad hoc Tribunal za Ruandu / UN Mehanizam za međunarodne krivične tribunale / Međunarodni krivični sud
Source:
NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 2016, 21, 1, 99-113
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
Funding / projects:
  • Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, Project: „Crime in Serbia and instruments of state response“, 2015-2019.

DOI: doi:10.5937/NBP1601099S

ISSN: 0354-8872

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1125
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Jakov
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Šurlan, Tijana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/handle/123456789/1125
AB  - Within the present paper a new phenomenon has been
elaborated - a phenomenon of expanding jurisdiction of the present
international criminal courts. At the moment there are two ad hoc
International Criminal Tribunals, one permanent International
Criminal Court and several hybrid and internationalized international
criminal courts. Ad hoc Tribunals are in the phase of transformation
into the UN Mechanism for the International Criminal Tribunals, as
a completely new forum, thus expanding Tribunals jurisdiction in
a new direction. As for the International Criminal Court, desirable
mode of its expanding is through the increase of its member states,
in the overall list of member-states. What is happening in reality
is that states are approaching ad hoc at the ICC’s docket, as the
situation directs them. Tendency in the realm of the international
criminal judiciary is that creation of new international criminal
courts is expected, although not warmly accepted. With the multiple
international criminal courts existing, in the same ratione materiae
jurisdiction, it is highly expected that the overlaps will occur as well
as the expanding of the jurisdiction that is beyond the usual terms
of norms interpretation. The focus of this paper is on a dilemma –
whether such a situation will provoke coherence or chaos.
AB  - Naslovljeni rad bavi se jednim novim fenomenom –
fenomenom proširivanja nadležnosti postojećih međunarodnih
krivičnih sudova. Trenutno postoje dva ad hoc Međunarodna
krivična tribunala, jedan stalni Međunarodni krivični sud i
nekoliko hibridnih i internacionalizovanih međunarodnih
krivičnih sudova. Ad hoc tribunali trenutno su u fazi transformacije
i prenošenja nadležnosti na UN Mehanizam za međunarodne
krivične tribunale. Što se tiče stalnog Međunarodnog krivičnog
suda, poželjan model proširivanja domašaja rada ovog Suda je
kroz uvećanje država članica njegovog Statuta. No što se trenutno
dešava je uvećavanje nadležnosti nekim drugačijim pravnim
sredstvima, a ne uobičajenim i poželjnim članstvom u Sudu.
Opšta tendencija u domenu međunarodnog krivičnog pravosuđa
ogleda se u uvećanom kreiranju novih sudova, iako ta tendencija
nije ubedljivo prihvaćena kao dobrodošla. Umnožavanje broja
međunarodnih sudova, sa istom ratione materiae nadležnošću,
jasno je da može dovesti do preklapanja u postupanju. S druge
strane dovodi do proširivanja nadležnosti po drugim principima
određivanja nadležnosti. Stoga fokus ovog rada i jeste usmeren
ka razrešenju dileme – da li opisana situacija kreira stanje
koherentnosti ili haosa.
PB  - Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
T2  - NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
T1  - Expanding Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts : coherence or chaos
T1  - Proširenje nadležnosti međunarodnih krivičnih sudova : koherentnost ili haos
VL  - 21
IS  - 1
SP  - 99
EP  - 113
DO  - doi:10.5937/NBP1601099S
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Šurlan, Tijana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Within the present paper a new phenomenon has been
elaborated - a phenomenon of expanding jurisdiction of the present
international criminal courts. At the moment there are two ad hoc
International Criminal Tribunals, one permanent International
Criminal Court and several hybrid and internationalized international
criminal courts. Ad hoc Tribunals are in the phase of transformation
into the UN Mechanism for the International Criminal Tribunals, as
a completely new forum, thus expanding Tribunals jurisdiction in
a new direction. As for the International Criminal Court, desirable
mode of its expanding is through the increase of its member states,
in the overall list of member-states. What is happening in reality
is that states are approaching ad hoc at the ICC’s docket, as the
situation directs them. Tendency in the realm of the international
criminal judiciary is that creation of new international criminal
courts is expected, although not warmly accepted. With the multiple
international criminal courts existing, in the same ratione materiae
jurisdiction, it is highly expected that the overlaps will occur as well
as the expanding of the jurisdiction that is beyond the usual terms
of norms interpretation. The focus of this paper is on a dilemma –
whether such a situation will provoke coherence or chaos., Naslovljeni rad bavi se jednim novim fenomenom –
fenomenom proširivanja nadležnosti postojećih međunarodnih
krivičnih sudova. Trenutno postoje dva ad hoc Međunarodna
krivična tribunala, jedan stalni Međunarodni krivični sud i
nekoliko hibridnih i internacionalizovanih međunarodnih
krivičnih sudova. Ad hoc tribunali trenutno su u fazi transformacije
i prenošenja nadležnosti na UN Mehanizam za međunarodne
krivične tribunale. Što se tiče stalnog Međunarodnog krivičnog
suda, poželjan model proširivanja domašaja rada ovog Suda je
kroz uvećanje država članica njegovog Statuta. No što se trenutno
dešava je uvećavanje nadležnosti nekim drugačijim pravnim
sredstvima, a ne uobičajenim i poželjnim članstvom u Sudu.
Opšta tendencija u domenu međunarodnog krivičnog pravosuđa
ogleda se u uvećanom kreiranju novih sudova, iako ta tendencija
nije ubedljivo prihvaćena kao dobrodošla. Umnožavanje broja
međunarodnih sudova, sa istom ratione materiae nadležnošću,
jasno je da može dovesti do preklapanja u postupanju. S druge
strane dovodi do proširivanja nadležnosti po drugim principima
određivanja nadležnosti. Stoga fokus ovog rada i jeste usmeren
ka razrešenju dileme – da li opisana situacija kreira stanje
koherentnosti ili haosa.",
publisher = "Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija",
journal = "NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo",
title = "Expanding Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts : coherence or chaos, Proširenje nadležnosti međunarodnih krivičnih sudova : koherentnost ili haos",
volume = "21",
number = "1",
pages = "99-113",
doi = "doi:10.5937/NBP1601099S"
}
Šurlan, T.. (2016). Expanding Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts : coherence or chaos. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo
Beograd : Kriminalističko-policijska akademija., 21(1), 99-113.
https://doi.org/doi:10.5937/NBP1601099S
Šurlan T. Expanding Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts : coherence or chaos. in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 2016;21(1):99-113.
doi:doi:10.5937/NBP1601099S .
Šurlan, Tijana, "Expanding Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts : coherence or chaos" in NBP : Journal of criminalistics and law = Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, 21, no. 1 (2016):99-113,
https://doi.org/doi:10.5937/NBP1601099S . .

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • International police cooperation and its impact on the efficiency of criminal procedure / Međunarodna policijska saradnja i njen uticaj na efikasnost krivičnog postupka 

    Žarković, Milan; Oparnica, Miloš (Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd, 2008)
  • Criminal intelligence work in prevention of international organized illegal migrations / Kriminalističko-obaveštajni rad u prevenciji međunarodnih organizovanih ilegalnih migracija 

    Mijalković, Saša (Kriminalističko- policijska akademija, Beograd, 2007)
  • Борба против прања новца у националном и међународном кривичном праву / Fight against money laundering in national and international criminal law 

    Коларић, Драгана (Београд : Криминалистичко-полицијска академија, 2007)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Jakov | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB